Public safety disarmament has always been the name of the game.
Senator Dianne Feinstein appearing on 60 Minutes circa 1995:
â€œIf I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up [every gun]â€¦ â€¦ Mr. and Mrs. America, turn â€˜em all in. I would have done that. I could not do that, the votes weren’t here.”
Second amendment intention: A well-armed populace is the best defense against tyranny
Kevin D. Williamson – NRO:
There is no legitimate exception to the Second Amendment for military-style weapons, because military-style weapons are precisely what the Second Amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear. The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny.
Consider the words of Supreme Court justice Joseph Story â€” who was, it bears noting, appointed to the Court by the guy who wrote the Constitution:
The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.
â€œUsurpation and arbitrary power of the rulersâ€ â€” not Bambi, not burglars. While your granddadâ€™s .30-06 is a good deal more powerful than the .223 rifles that give blue-state types the howling fantods, that is not what we have a constitutional provision to protect.
Liberals are forever asking: â€œWhy would anybody need a gun like that?â€
And the answer is: because we are not serfs. We are a free people living under a republic of our own construction. We may consent to be governed, but we will not be ruled.
Anti-Second Amendment = pro-tyranny? You tell me.
Impeach Sen. Diane Feinstein for violating her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States (21,501 signatures so far):