Those Who Forget History Are Doomed To Repeat It

FDR’s New Deal ‘Planned economy or planned destruction?’ political cartoon published in the Chicago Tribune on April 21, 1934.

On Wednesday [June 10, 2009] the Trib reprinted the cartoon with the caption “This is a 1934 Chicago Tribune political cartoon that many say rings true in today’s political and economic climate. What do you think?”

Beware America There Are ‘Pinkos’ Among U.S.

Plan of action for U.S.

Spend! Spend! Spend!

Under the guise of ‘recovery

Bust the government.

Blame the ‘capitalists‘ for the failure.

Junk the ‘constitution‘.

Declare a dictatorship.

Ring any bells? From where I sit the din is deafening.

“Pinkies” predated the term ‘pinkos‘. Cast of characters and more at News Busters.

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis:

“The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.” >>>

Related: Obama Nation Fundamental Transformation

Complete List Of Obama’s Taxpayer Funded Green Energy Failures

Remember the well aimed “you don’t just pick the winners and losers, you pick the losers” zinger Romney successfully launched at Obama during the 1st debate? It was a bitch slap heard ’round the world. Arguably [the] best line of the debate.

YouTube Preview Image

And the only response Obama could muster was to take his trusty pick-ax index finger and mine for gold?? Ewww. If that is how he behaves in public, one wonders how he acts in private. But I digress.

(Transcript and MORE at Hot Air.)

Moving along, thanks to Heritage we now have an up to date comprehensive list of Obama’s green failures to refer to:

…The fact that some companies are not under financial duress does not make the policy a success. It simply means that our taxpayer dollars subsidized companies that would’ve found the financial support in the private market.

So far, 36 companies that have received federal support from taxpayers have either gone bankrupt or are laying off workers and are heading for bankruptcy. This list includes only those companies that received federal money from the Obama Administration’s Department of Energy. The amount of money indicated does not reflect how much was actually received or spent but how much was offered. The amount also does not include other state, local, and federal tax credits and subsidies, which push the amount of money these companies have received from taxpayers even higher.

The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:

  1. Evergreen Solar ($24 million)*
  2. SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
  3. Solyndra ($535 million)*
  4. Beacon Power ($69 million)*
  5. AES’s subsidiary Eastern Energy ($17.1 million)
  6. Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
  7. SunPower ($1.5 billion)
  8. First Solar ($1.46 billion)
  9. Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
  10. EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
  11. Amonix ($5.9 million)
  12. National Renewable Energy Lab ($200 million)
  13. Fisker Automotive ($528 million)
  14. Abound Solar ($374 million)*
  15. A123 Systems ($279 million)*
  16. Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($6 million)
  17. Johnson Controls ($299 million)
  18. Schneider Electric ($86 million)
  19. Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
  20. ECOtality ($126.2 million)
  21. Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
  22. Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
  23. Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
  24. Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
  25. Range Fuels ($80 million)*
  26. Thompson River Power ($6.4 million)*
  27. Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
  28. LSP Energy ($2.1 billion)*
  29. UniSolar ($100 million)*
  30. Azure Dynamics ($120 million)*
  31. GreenVolts ($500,000)
  32. Vestas ($50 million)
  33. LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($150 million)
  34. Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
  35. Navistar ($10 million)
  36. Satcon ($3 million)*

*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy.

Continued >>>

Pay close attention, as more are sure to follow.

Emphasis mine.

Coal Miners Fight Back Against Obama’s “Blatantly False” TV Ad: “Stop The Absolute Lies”

Thanks to the Obama led ‘war on coal’; “If Obama is re-elected he will put us all out of work permanently.”

The Intelligencer reports:

The miners said Obama’s campaign team is running ads filled with “blatantly false” statements about the miners regarding their participation in Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s August campaign stop at the Century Mine. These ads assert that the miners were forced to attend the event by the mine’s owner, Robert Murray.

“There are numerous false statements and absolute lies concerning our participation in this event, mostly started by a local ‘shock jock’ radio host,” the miners’ letter to Obama states. “Why would you (Obama) lie about the 500 working miners who have signed this letter? We, the employees of the Century Mine would request you immediately stop these false ads.”

The miner’s press conference (full video):

YouTube Preview Image

(Miners Fightback) — Coal miners tell Obama to stop the absolute lies in TV ad accusing miners of being props at rally for Romney. Miners held a press conference to release a letter signed by over 500 miners saying they were not forced to attend Romney event. They wanted to attend because there is a war on coal and Obama is leading it. If Obama is re-elected he will put us all out of work permanently.

H/T Fresh Ink (See the Obama ad at link)

Priceless!! OBAMA’S CHANGES!! (Official Music Video)

YouTube Preview Image

Election 2012 Choices: Businessman Who Has Generated Billions (Of Private $) or President Who Has Wasted Trillions (Of Your $)

Vote like your life depends on it, because in a manner of speaking — it does.

Via @stoo11

Top Obama DOE Official Who Fast Tracked Solyndra Loan “Bolts” From ABC At DNC Convention “Ran For The Exit”

"Top Obama bundler Steve Spinner, who was at the center of the federal loan to Solyndra, got a VIP tour of the Democratic National Convention floor in Charlotte and posed at the podium." (ABC)

One doesn’t run, unless one has something to hide. What does Steven J. Spinner (Obama Administration’s Department of Energy‘s former loan programs advisor) have to hide?

(ABC) –The Obama campaign rolled out the red carpet this week for a former top Energy Department official who was at the center of the ill-fated government loan [$535 million] to Solyndra, a California solar panel firm that wound up in bankruptcy.

Steven J. Spinner joined other top fundraisers for a VIP tour of the Democratic National Convention floor in Charlotte Monday evening, posing and waving for a photographer while standing behind the podium. When he saw ABC News cameras, however, he ran for the exit.

Spinner was last in the headlines in October, when emails surfaced showing he had pushed for the Solyndra loan from his post in the Energy Department, apparently in an effort to score the loan as a political victory for President Obama.

READ the Original Blotter Story About Spinner’s Emails

“How hard is this? What is he waiting for?” Spinner wrote in one of them. “I have OVP [the Office of the Vice President] and WH [the White House] breathing down my neck on this.”
……
ABC News made repeated attempts to interview Spinner as the Solyndra saga unfolded, and he declined. When he was approached by ABC News on the convention floor Monday, he bolted for an exit.

A DNC employee blocked ABC News reporters from following Spinner as he broke into a run.
……

Neither the Obama campaign nor the White House responded to requests for comment about Spinner.

Continued >>>

Mitt Romney Responds To Obama’s “Startling and Revealing” “You Didn’t Build That” Remark

“Insulting to every entrepreneur, every innovator in America and it’s wrong”
~ Mitt Romney –Irwin, Pennsylvania July 17, 2012

Partial clip:

YouTube Preview Image

Full transcript (above video clip text italicized):

Thank you. Thank you so much. Boy, Pennsylvania knows how to welcome somebody, I’ll tell you that. You guys. You know it is that enthusiasm and that optimism that I am convinced is going to drive America to an economic rebound, is going to create jobs, a brighter future for our kids. I am not someone who is looking to America to decline, I am looking to America to take off and it’s going to happen with new leadership. But we’re going to have to take a very different direction than this country has been on in the last three and half years if we’re going to see the kind of bright future we’d like to see for ourselves, for our friends and neighbors, and for our children. Because the President came into office and recognized things were in trouble and he went on The Today Show after being inaugurated and he said “look if I can’t turn around the economy in three years, I’d be looking at a one-term proposition.” Well, he’s right. Now I think he’s got the message that there are 23 million Americans that are out of work, or that have stopped looking for work, or can only get part time jobs. I think he has heard that about half of this years college graduates can’t find work or find work that’s consistent with their college degree. I think he’s heard the message that the median income in America has dropped by 10% in the last four years. I think he’s seen the record number of foreclosures and so he has to recognize his policies have failed to get America working again. And my guess is that he wonders why that is and I have the answer for him: liberal policies don’t make good jobs. [Applause]

You look at them one by one. Everybody knows that our healthcare system has all sorts of problems and things that need to be corrected, most important of which, or one of the most important is it’s very expensive, health insurance is extraordinarily expensive. There are a lot of things that need to be done to improve healthcare but Obamacare is not the answer. We’ve got to replace it and get rid of it. [Applause] He has other policies that haven’t helped create jobs. Obamacare, you know, I hope you know the Obamacare, by the way, I hope you know the numbers on that and the impact it’s had on job creation. The Chamber of Commerce went out to their members and surveyed them and said what’s been the impact of Obamacare and three quarters, three quarters said they are less likely to hire people because of Obamacare. You see, his policies did not help create jobs, they depressed job creation and that’s why we’re still struggling with so many people out of work. And by the way, let me just note, this number, 8.2% unemployment, we have gone 41 months with unemployment above 8%. And why’s that number, why do we keep on talking about 8%? Because that’s the bogey the President himself set. He said look if we let him borrow $787 billion in his first year, which Congress let him do, that he would hold unemployment below 8%, and it has not been below 8% since. And that’s a number but it represents real people, people facing some real tough times, people out of work, and stopped looking for work, as I said, but also people who are actually working in jobs, a lot of them facing tough times. A lot of people employed wonder whether they’re going to be able to afford retirement. There are a number of folks who, I don’t know whether you read the story over the weekend, there was a story in The New York Times, which described a couple of women that are working in a day care center, one of whom is a single mom. She has three kids. One full-time job, three kids does not make a real comfortable life. She’s had tougher and tougher times. Being middle class in America is getting tougher and tougher and a lot of people in the middle class have fallen into poverty. This President’s economy is not working for the American people, even for those that are employed. [Applause]

So I mentioned Obamacare as something that kills iobs. There’s another one. When you increase the number of regulations at a rate three times that of his predecessor, with a bill like Dodd-Frank that makes it harder for small banks to grow and thrive and make loans, you don’t add jobs. When you have energy policies that say no to fracking and no to drilling offshore and no to drilling in Alaska, no to taking advantage of our resources here, when you say no to coal, when you put in place regulations that don’t allow coal to be able to be mined or to be used, these things kill jobs and that’s got to stop.

There’s, there’s something else that’s got to stop and I believe you know about this but you know the history of our country is a country where individuals with their dreams go out and begin an enterprise like this one here that Joe and his colleagues built, and they go out and talk to friends and family and say “would you loan us the money to start the business” and people scrape together the cash and build, or buy a building like they bought this one here and get started in business, sometimes successfully, sometimes not, that’s sort of how we have done it in this country. And that’s very different than the way they’ve done it in other countries, where the government comes in, and based on who you know in government, whose a friend in government, you get money from them, you get tax payer dollars. That’s happening in this country today. I am ashamed to say that we’re seeing our President hand out money to the businesses of campaign contributors, when he gave money, $500 million in loans to a company called Fisker that makes high-end electric cars, and they make the cars now in Finland. That is wrong and it’s got to stop. That kind of crony capitalism does not create jobs and it does not create jobs here. I believe in free people and free markets and I want government to get out of investing in individual businesses. [Applause]

So, so the President’s looking around for someone to blame, and recently, I became the reason for all our problems here. I was as surprised, my family and me, but he’s always looking for someone out there: ATM machines, tsunamis, China, Europe. I mean it’s always something, Congress. We won’t forget, by the way, that Congress was in his party for two years with a super majority. He doesn’t take responsibility for what happened while he was President and he had his Congress. But so he’s looking around, he can’t find someone to blame effectively. He’s out of ideas. He’s got no new ideas for getting the economy going. He’s got no one new to blame. He’s out of touch with what’s happening in the country and that’s why in November we are going to put him out of office. [Applause]

You know, thank you, you know something happened, something happened on Friday. President Obama exposed what he really thinks about free people and the American vision, and government, what he really thinks about America itself. He probably wants to understand why his policies failed. If you want to understand why his policies have failed, why what he has done has not created jobs, or rising incomes in America, you can look at what he said. And what he said was this, I quote, and he was speaking about businesses like this one, small businesses, big businesses, mid-sized businesses, mining businesses, manufacturing service businesses of all kinds. He said this: “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that, somebody else made that happen.” That somebody else is government in his view. He goes on to describe the people who deserve the credit for building this business. And, of course, he describes people who we care very deeply about, who make a difference in our lives, our schoolteachers, fire fighters, people who build roads. We need those things, we value schoolteachers, fire fighters, people who build roads, you really couldn’t have a business if you didn’t have those things. But, you know, we pay for those things. The taxpayers pay for government. It’s not like government just provides those to all of us and we say oh thank you government for doing those things. In fact we pay for them and we benefit from them and we appreciate the work that they do and the sacrifices that are done by people who work in government. But they did not build this business.

The idea to say that Steve Jobs didn’t build Apple, that Henry Ford didn’t build Ford Motor, that Papa John didn’t build Papa John Pizza, that Ray Kroc didn’t build McDonald’s, that Bill Gates didn’t build Microsoft, you go on the list, that Joe and his colleagues didn’t build this enterprise, to say something like that is not just foolishness, it is insulting to every entrepreneur, every innovator in America and it’s wrong. [Applause]

And by the way, the President’s logic doesn’t just extend to the entrepreneurs that start a barber shop or a taxi operation or an oil field service business like this and a gas service business like this, it also extends to everybody in America that wants to lift themself up a little further, that goes back to school to get a degree and see if they can get a little better job, to somebody who wants to get some new skills and get a little higher income, to somebody who have, may have dropped out that decides to get back in school and go for it. People who reach to try and lift themself up. The President would say, well you didn’t do that. You couldn’t have gotten to school without the roads that government built for you. You couldn’t have gone to school without teachers. So you didn’t, you are not responsible for that success. President Obama attacks success and therefore under President Obama we have less success and I will change that. [Applause]

I’ve got to be honest, I don’t think anyone could have said what he said who had actually started a business or been in a business. And my own view is that what the President said was both startling and revealing. I find it extraordinary that a philosophy of that nature would be spoken by a President of the United States. It goes to something that I have spoken about from the beginning of the campaign. That this election is, to a great degree, about the soul of America. Do we believe in an America that is great because of government or do we believe in an America that is great because of free people allowed to pursue their dreams and build our future? [Applause]

You understand, of course, what’s going on. What he is saying is his justification for raising taxes higher and higher, because government needs more. What he is saying is his justification for Obamacare, which says that we need 2,300 pages of legislation to have government more intrusive in your life. What he is saying is his justification for a larger and larger government. This is very different, by the way, than the Democratic Party of Bill Clinton that said that the era of big-government was over, that reformed welfare. You heard that story by the way, he is trying to take work out of welfare requirement. It is changing the nature of America, changing the nature of what the Democrats have fought for, and Republicans have fought for. In the past, people of both parties understood that encouraging achievement, encouraging success, encouraging people to lift themselves as high as they can, encouraging entrepreneurs, celebrating success instead of attacking it and denigrating, makes America strong. That’s the right course for this country. His course is extraordinarily foreign. [Applause]

Now, Joe, Joe got it right. Where did Joe go? He, there he is right here. Joe got it right. He said something about what would happen if President Obama were reelected. And I don’t think that’s going to happen. But if he were reelected, I want you to know that what you’ve see for the last three and a half years, you’d be seeing for the next four and a half years. And what that means is: chronic high levels of unemployment, it means low wage growth to negative wage growth, declining median incomes in this country, and it means putting America on the door to fiscal calamity. We have seen what Obama’s political philosophy brings, and we don’t want any more of it. [Applause] I have a very different view than the President’s. You see, I happen to believe that the kid who studies hard and works hard and gets an ‘A,’ that he achieved that or she achieved that and I give them credit it for doing so. [Applause] I believed the person who worked hard and did a good job and got a promotion deserves credit for having achieved that. I believe that the young person who came up with a new idea that changed the world on the internet deserves credit for having done that. [Applause] And, by the way, I believe that Joe and people around him and all these businesses I met around the country that have grown and thrived, I believe that they and the people who work there, built those enterprises, it is their responsibility,their achievement, and they deserve credit for it. [Applause]

The President justifies taking more of what people earn by saying: “look it’s also our system of government that makes things possible for entrepreneurs and innovators and that’s true, but let’s stop and think about the government and what it tells us in its founding document, the Declaration of Independence. It does not say that the government gave us our rights; it said that God gave us our rights—they come with us, not with government. It said that among our rights given to us by God, by our creator, were life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Our capacity to build and lift ourselves and reach for the stars is not thanks to a government that says “fine.” It is instead thanks to a God who loves us and gives us those rights and those opportunities. [Applause]

I’m convinced that President Obama’s efforts to denigrate and diminish success and individual achievement would diminish us all, and that’s one reason why he’s not going to get reelected. I’ll tell you this: I’m convinced he wants Americans to be ashamed of success. I want Americans to welcome it, to celebrate success, to encourage people to reach as high as they can and in some cases to build enterprises. I don’t want government to take credit for what the individuals of America accomplish. Whether they work in government or work in the private sector, it’s the people of America that make America the unique nation, the exceptional nation that it is. [Applause]

I believe that if you have a philosophy and an approach as a nation which celebrates risk-takers and celebrates achievement and says go out there and do whatever you can and welcomes dreamers from all over the world that that will make us more prosperous and create more jobs. We know what his philosophy brings. We’ve seen it the last three and a half years. We’ve seen the numbers. We’ve seen the suffering. His philosophy of big government, government intrusive in our lives, higher taxes keeps us from achieving what we can achieve. I’ve got five steps to get this economy going again, five things I’m going to do. And I want you to know those five things, if we do them—and I’ll do them—if we do them these things are going to cause a resurgence in America’s economy that’s going to surprise the world, is going to convince moms and dads that the future’s brighter for them and the future’s brighter for their kids. And I’ll tell you what those five things are:

Number one: I want to take advantage of our oil and our gas and our coal and our renewables and our nuclear. [Applause] Seems to me you agree with that point.

Let me mention another one, and that is one that this President has really not pursued, and that is trade. You see, we’re a highly productive nation. We make more goods and services per person than any other major nation in the world. And so it helps us to trade with other nations. By the way: China and Europe figured that out. Over the last four years, three and a half years rather, they’ve put together some forty-four different trade agreements with other nations to sell goods back and forth because they know that helps them. Do you know how many this President has put in place? Zero. If I’m President, I want to open up new trade with places particularly in Latin America, right next door: a lot of people, a growing middle class, huge opportunity for us. That’s my number two is trade.

Number three: when you have a government that consistently borrows massively more than it takes in and you create larger and larger debt, as that debt gets so large relative to the size of the total economy, you slow down economic growth. Slow growth means fewer jobs. And that is why as President of the United States I will get America on track to have a balanced budget. [Applause] So number one energy, number two trade, number three a balanced budget—let me mention another one.

I want to make sure our people have the skills for the jobs of today and tomorrow. And I’m not going to thank government for giving them those skills I’m going to make sure the people have the opportunity to reach for those capabilities. I want people to have good training opportunities in the workplace and in our colleges and universities. I also want people to get the best schools in the world. We’re not providing our kids the education they need. I want more choice in education. I will put our kids first and our unions behind, give the kids the best schools in the world. [Applause]

And my fifth, in addition to skills and education, is this: I want to encourage economic freedom. Our economy is driven by free people pursuing their ideas and their dreams. It is not driven by government. And what the President’s doing is crushing economic freedom. This philosophy of his, least him saying we’re going to take the tax on investment from 15% to 25% so government’s bigger, I want people to be freer. That’s why, in my view, anybody making $250,000 a year and less should pay no taxes on capital gains, interest, or dividends at all. Be able to invest. [Applause] He’s crushing economic freedom, crushing economic freedom with taxes and an overwhelming regulatory burden, with high costs in healthcare, with labor rules that are not favorable to the employee or to the employer but only to the bosses of the unions. Look, we have to restore economic freedom in this country, and when we do those five things—energy, trade, balancing our budget, improving our schools giving people the skills they need, and restoring economic freedom in a major way—we do those things you’re going to see us come roaring back.

I have seen it in the people of America. I have witnessed it as I’ve gone across the campaign trail. I was in San Diego, and I met with a guy named Alex Lukianov, Russian immigrant. Came over here, had some back problems, looked at how we do surgery and had some ideas about how to come up with something better. He had this idea of instead of operating by going in through the middle of your backbone he goes in through the side and he puts in a little device to fuse the backbone vertebrae—I’m getting complicated here… [Laughter] But the long story short is he starts a business, trains doctors in how to provide this surgery, sells them the device that they put in their back, and, by the way, now he has 1,300 employees working in that business and $900 million in revenues. [Applause] And Mr. President: Mr. Lukianov and the other founders and the workers there built that business. Government did not build that business. [Applause]

I met a guy named Jim Leotold, and Jim didn’t do real well in school: he graduated second from the bottom in his class in high school. And his dad said to him: either go into the military or to college. And college didn’t look like it was the right place for him and he wanted to do something different so he asked his dad if he could get a loan to start a business. He wanted to start a restaurant. He wanted to make hot dogs and hamburgers, I believe, and his dad gave him a loan, but when he got the money he realized: there’s not enough money here to actually start a restaurant that has the cooking grills for hot dogs and hamburgers and the big hoods that vent the smoke and so-forth so all he could do with the money he had was to makes sandwiches. So he went into a garage, made sandwiches, and he delivered the sandwiches to people at work. Today, Jim Leotold—or, you know him better as Jimmy John—has 1,200 restaurants and employs tens of thousands of people. [Applause] And you see, I happen to believe that Jim Leotold, JimmyJohn, built that business with the help of people around him, his friends, the people who worked there in that enterprise. I do not give government credit for having built that, I give free people credit for having built that business. [Applause]

And so I see that entrepreneurial spirit and that innovativeness of the American people and our willingness to work hard in whatever role we have and to lift and to improve our lot and to improve the lot of the enterprises we work in—I see that as driving this economy to be the most powerful in the history of the Earth. It has already; it will again. The course we’re on right now is foreign to us. It changes America. This is a vote for what kind of America we’re going to have, and for me I vote for freedom and free people. [Applause]

Let me just end with this thought: this is an important choice. This is a defining choice. This is a choice about what America’s going to be. Not just for the next few years but for a century. This is a choice which will determine what kind of future our kids are going to have. And, in fact, it also determines what kind of future the world’s going to have. America plays an unusual role in the world—I think we understand that. Some in some circles tend to brush that aside. But those that have fought in world wars and other conflicts recognize the greatness of America and our unique role in the history of the earth. [Applause]

We call them heroes. I want to express appreciation to heroes proved in liberating strife who more than self their country loved and mercy more than life. Could our veterans please raise their hands and members of the active duty armed services? Thank you. [Applause]

I was in Great Britain some months ago and met with Tony Blair and then with David Cameron and with other leaders of the government there, and one said this to me: he said, you know Mitt if you’re lucky enough to be elected President of the United States and you travel around from country to country and to their capitals, you will undoubtedly have rehearsed for you all the things they think America is doing wrong. But please don’t ever forget this: the one thing we all fear the most is a weak America. American strength, strength in our values, strength in our homes, strength in our economy, strength in our military is essential to the world it is the best ally for peace. [Applause]

And let me assure you that dividing America and attacking success and minimizing the achievement and accomplishment of entrepreneurs of all kinds—that does not make a stronger America. Believing in America mean believing in those principles upon which this nation was founded. And I do. I will keep those principles aloft. We will fight for them. We will keep America the hope of the earth. Together we will bring back the strength that provides a bright future for us and for our children. Thank you so very much. [Applause]

The full video is up at The Right Scoop here.

Update: How Obama’s “You Didn’t Build That” Comment Was Wrong “In Context”

Geothermal Co. [Still] Struggling After $98.5 MILLION Taxpayer Bailout

Nevada Dem Senator Harry Reid’s 2010 prediction that Nevada Geothermal Power will “put Nevadans to work” by becoming the “Saudi Arabia of geothermal energy” fell flat. Not…one…single…job…was…created.

(Washington Times) –A geothermal energy company with a $98.5 million loan guarantee from the Obama administration for an alternative energy project in Nevada — which received hearty endorsements from Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — faces financial problems, and the company’s auditors have questioned whether it can stay in business.

Much like Solyndra LLC, a California solar-panel manufacturer with a $535 million federal loan guarantee that went bankrupt, Nevada Geothermal Power (NGP) has incurred $98 million in net losses over the past several years, has substantial debts and does not generate enough cash from its current operations after debt-service costs, an internal audit said.
……
NPG was rated BB+, which is considered speculative or junk and a step below investment grade.
……
Mr. Reid, a Nevada Democrat who led passage of the $814 billion stimulus bill and worked to include the loan guarantee program to help finance clean-energy projects, predicted in 2010 that NGP would “put Nevadans to work” and declared that Nevada was the “Saudi Arabia of geothermal energy.”

Mr. Chu celebrated NGP’s potential in his June 2010 announcement of the loan guarantee, saying the federal government’s support of the company demonstrated its commitment to geothermal power to achieve the nation’s clean-energy goals.
……
A committee report said the loan did not finance any new construction and “did not help to create a single job.”
……
Mr. Fairbank [president and CEO of NGP] denied knowing or lobbying Mr. Reid, but the House Oversight Committee said Ormat Inc., which was paid $80 million to build NGP’s Blue Mountain plant, has “strong ties” to the senator. It said two former Reid staffers, Kai Anderson and Paul Thomsen, work for Ormat.

Continue reading >>>

How cozy…

Obama A No Silver Bullets Gas Bag Running On Empty

YouTube Preview Image

Tweet the pain you are feeling at the pump:

Obama’s “No Silver Bullets” talking point ad nausem:

YouTube Preview Image

Obama’s Fuzzy Math: 2% of the word’s oil. Fact: We have 200 years worth of energy available today

YouTube Preview Image

More at the Washington Post’s Fact Checker.

Gallup March 22, 2012: “A Solid Majority” Of Americans Favor Keystone XL Pipeline

 ABC: Highest ever gas price recorded in March

The average price of a gallon of regular is now $3.87, the highest recorded price in March. The average price is up nearly 4 cents from a week ago, and over 30 cents from a year ago, according to the Department of Energy, as more drivers face gas prices of $4 a gallon or more across the country.

Last week, the average gas price was $3.83 a gallon, the previous record according to data going back to 1990. [...]

Update: Speaker Boehner Highlights “Obama Energy Gap” Between the President’s Words & Actions on Addressing Soaring Gas Prices

YouTube Preview Image

“You know gas prices are rising and Americans are frustrated with the gap between the president’s words and his actions.  The president now says he supports the Republican ‘all of the above’ energy strategy for our country.  But for three years his administration has made every effort to block, delay, and restrict new energy production in our country.

“He claims that he wants to address rising gas prices, but his policies are actually making matters worse for families and small businesses.  And the only recent action the president’s taken on energy involved lobbying senators – personally and successfully – to prevent construction of the Keystone pipeline.

Yet today he’s out in Oklahoma trying to take credit for a part of the pipeline that doesn’t even require his approval.  Now, this is what I’m calling the ‘Obama Energy Gap.’  Up here in Canada, and in North Dakota, we’ve got all this oil.  And the president’s down here in Oklahoma taking credit for a part of the pipeline that’s going to go through the normal process.  It’s already gotten its approvals.  And this idea that the president is going to expedite this will have no impact on the construction of this pipeline.

“Now, let me explain something.  It’s not just oil that’s up in Canada.  Right now, this year, North Dakota will become the second largest oil-producing state in our country.  There are three, one-hundred tank trains every day that come out of North Dakota and have to go all the way to the Gulf because of the lack of this pipeline.  And so it’s Canadian oil, it’s North Dakota oil, that needs to get down to our refineries in the Gulf.

“So the president can take credit for having nothing to do with the bottom half of this pipeline, and the fact is is there’s only one permit that requires his approval because it crosses our national boundaries and that’s the Keystone decision on the upper half of this.

“Remember we have 165,000 miles of pipeline in our country that operate successfully every day.  The Congress earlier this year passed a pipeline safety bill to increase the safety standards on this 165,000 miles of pipeline.  The president should listen to the American people and allow the Keystone pipeline to go forward.
“There’s a big gap between what the president promises and what he talks about, and the actions that he’s taking.  And I think honest, hard-working taxpayers deserve actions that match the words.”

Also see:

Morning Bell: Obama Mocks Critics As Gas Prices Go Up – Heritage Foundation

Obama Makes 4 Misleading Gas Statements in One Week – Breitbart.com

Michelle Malkin’s “Obama’s algae racket

Obama Flashback 2006: “Replace Oil Altogether” With A “National’ Biofuel Infrastructure”

And a little something about his calling for the “striking of a grand bargain” with the Big Three automakers –taxpayers “picking up the tab for retiree health care costs in exchange for the car companies using that savings to invest in more fuel-efficient cars.”

Obama speech: Energy Independence: A Call for Leadership
TOPIC: Oil & Alternative Fuels
September 20, 2006
Complete Text

Fact: Since taking office, President Obama’s entire energy agenda has made a gallon of gas more expensive -Click to learn more

Now that summer’s over and gas prices have finally come down a bit, there’s a temptation to put any discussion about energy on the back burner until the next crisis arises. Gone are the days when the President would make sweeping pronouncements in his State of the Union about America’s addiction to oil – today there is far more political mileage out of questioning Democrats’ commitment to fighting terror than by affirming America’s commitment to energy independence.

But as the President may or may not have learned by now, simply ignoring a problem doesn’t make it go away. Because while headlines about price gouging and gas lines have temporarily faded from the news, new headlines have emerged that should have us every bit as concerned about the addiction we just can’t seem to shake.

In just the last week, two in particular caught my eye.

One is from the Detroit Free Press, and it talks about how Ford Motor Company plans to cut 30,000 hourly jobs, 14,000 salaried jobs, and close sixteen plants by 2012.

Now, there are plenty of reasons for Ford’s financial troubles, but one of the most glaring has been their inability to compete with foreign counterparts by transitioning to the fuel-efficient and hybrid vehicles that represent the future of the auto industry.

200,000 of these hybrids are driving around China today, a country that already has a higher fuel economy than we do. Over in Japan, Toyota is doubling production of the popular Prius to sell 100,000 in the U.S. this year. But at Ford, there are plans to make only 20,000 Escape Hybrids in 2006, and GM’s brand won’t be on the market until 2007. Meanwhile, the waiting lists for a hybrid car in this country get longer by the day.

These foreign auto companies are out-innovating and out-competing us, and if we do nothing to help U.S. carmakers, tens of thousands more jobs and billions in business will be heading overseas in the months to come.

Unfortunately, job losses and foreign competition are just the half of it. Because the second headline that caught my eye was in Saturday’s New York Times, and it read, “Suicide Attacks Foiled at 2 Oil Sites in Yemen.”

This news is disturbing, but not surprising. For years, Al Qaeda has been trying to attack Middle Eastern oil refineries as a way to wreak havoc on the U.S. economy. Osama bin Laden himself has said, “Focus your operations on oil, especially in Iraq and the Gulf area, since this will cause them to die off [on their own].” In the past, even minor attacks have caused global prices to jump $2 per barrel in a single day. And a former CIA agent tells us that if terrorists ever succeeded in destroying an entire oil complex, it could take enough oil off the market to cause financial catastrophe in America.

More than anything else, headlines like these represent a realization that goes far beyond the temporary rise and fall of gas prices. It’s a realization that for all of our economic dominance – for all of our military might – the Achilles heel of the most powerful country on Earth is the oil we cannot live without.

The President knows this. That thousands of autoworkers are losing their jobs. That we spend $18 million on foreign oil ever hour. That our climate is changing and global temperatures are rising.

And yet, for someone who talks tough about defending America, actually solving our energy crisis seems to factor pretty low on the President’s agenda.

And that’s because as much as George Bush might want to defend America, he also needs to defend his vision of government – and that’s a government that can’t, won’t, and shouldn’t solve great national challenges like our energy dependence.

That’s why the President’s funding for renewable fuels is at the same level it was the day he took office. That’s why his budget funds less then half of the energy bill he himself signed into law. That’s why billions of tax dollars that could’ve been used to fund energy research went to the record-profiting oil companies instead.

And that’s why it’s time to stand up for a new vision of government this November.

You see, it’s this timidity – this smallness – in our politics that’s holding us back right now. The idea that some problems are just too big to handle, and if you just ignore them, sooner or later, they’ll go away.

But that’s not where the American people are. They still believe in an America where anything’s possible – they just don’t think their leaders do. They still dream big dreams – they just sense their leaders have forgotten how.

There’s a reason that some have compared the quest for energy independence to the Manhattan Project or the Apollo moon landing. Like those historic efforts, moving away from an oil economy is a major challenge that will require a sustained national commitment.

During World War II, we had an entire country working around the clock to produce enough planes and tanks to beat the Axis powers. In the middle of the Cold War, we built a national highway system so we had a quick way to transport military equipment across the country. When we wanted to beat the Russians into space, we poured millions into a national education initiative that graduated thousands of new scientists and engineers.

If we hope to strengthen our security and create hundreds of thousands of new jobs, we can offer no less of a commitment to energy independence.

With technology we have on the shelves right now and fuels we can grow right here in America, by 2025 we can reduce our oil imports by over 7.5. million barrels per day – an amount greater than all the oil we are expected to import from the entire Middle East.

We start by producing cars that use less oil. The auto industry has not been asked to raise fuel economy standards in seventeen years, and lately we’ve just stopped asking them to.

Today, we have no choice. Starting in 2008, if we raised CAF’E standards a modest 3% a year over the next twelve years, by 2020 passenger vehicles would average 40.5 mpg and light trucks would average 32.6 mpg. This is by no means a dramatic increase – five years ago, the National Academy of Sciences concluded that raising CAF’E to 33 mpg for passenger cars could easily be done without compromising passenger safety.

Not only would this reduce America’s oil consumption, but it would increase profits for the auto industry. Yesterday a University of Michigan report came out that said if the Big Three automakers took proactive steps to increase the fuel-efficiency of their vehicles, they would stand to gain up to $2 billion more in profits per year. But if they continue on their current path, they could stand to lose up to $3.6 billion in profits.

Of course, auto executives are right when they say that transitioning to these more fuel-efficient automobiles would be costly at a time of sagging profits and stiff competition, and that’s precisely why the federal government shouldn’t let the industry face these costs on their own.

We should strike a grand bargain with the Big Three automakers where the government [TAXPAYERS] picks up part of the tab for their retiree health care costs – a tab that ran almost $6.7 billion just last year – in exchange for the car companies using that savings to invest in more fuel-efficient cars.

Beyond raising CAFE, however, it’s time we replace oil altogether as America’s fuel of choice. This doesn’t just mean singing the praises of ethanol and hoping that it finds its way into our fuel supply on its own. It means taking major steps now to put a national biofuel infrastructure in place.

Already, some cars on the road have the flexible-fuel tanks necessary for them to run on E85, a cheaper, cleaner blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. But millions upon millions of cars still don’t have these tanks.

It’s time for them to install those tanks in every single car they make, and it’s time for the government [TAXPAYERS] to cover this small cost, which currently runs at just $100 per car. We should also make sure that from now on, every single automobile the government purchases is a flex-fuel vehicle.

It’s also a time to start making E85 fueling stations more available to the public. Currently, only 681 out of 170,000 fueling stations in America offer E85 pumps. This is not acceptable. Every American should have the choice to fill up their car with E85 at any fueling station. And oil companies should stop standing in the way and join us in making this happen. If the big oil companies would devote just 1% of their first quarter profits this year to install E85 pumps, more than 7,000 service stations would be able to serve E85 to hungry motorists.

Finally, we should reduce the risk of investing in renewable fuels by providing loan guarantees and venture capital to those entrepreneurs with the best plans to develop and sell biofuels. And we should create a market for renewable fuels by ramping up the renewable fuel standard and creating an alternative diesel standard in this country that together would blend 65 billion gallons of renewable fuels into the petroleum supply each year.

In the days and months after September 11th, Americans were waiting to be called to something bigger than themselves. Just like their parents and grandparents of the Greatest Generation, they were willing to serve and defend their country – not only on the fields of war, but on the homefront too.

This is our chance to step up and serve. For decades, we have heard President after President call for energy independence in this country, but for decades, we have fallen short. Well it’s time to call on ourselves. We shouldn’t wait for the next time gas hits $3 a gallon - and we shouldn’t accept any more headlines that talk about a dying auto industry or a terrorist plot to use oil as a weapon against America. We should act – and we should act now.

Now is the time for serious leadership to get us started down the path of energy independence. Now is the time for this call to arms. I hope some of the ideas I’ve laid out today can serve as a basis for this call, but I also hope that members of both parties and all levels of government can come together in the near future to launch this serious quest for energy independence. Thank you.

Previously posted here: Flashback Video: In 2008 Current Obama Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar Objected to Offshore Drilling Even if Gas Prices Reached $10 Per Gallon