Obama on the Zimmerman case (July 19, 2013):
“…if a white male teen was involved in the same kind of scenario, that, from top to bottom, both the outcome and the aftermath might have been different.”
“Might have been different”; not in this case:
The similarities between theÂ Scott-Cervini case and the Zimmerman-Martin case are striking. One notable exception though is that ‘race’ was never brought into the picture. Gee, I wonder why… Racist grievance mongers, what say you?
“Scott is charged with manslaughter in the April 4 shooting across the street from his home on Baneberry Way in Greece (NY).” (YNN)
(YNN Rochester) Not guilty: The verdict in the manslaughter trial of Roderick Scott. After more than 19 hours of deliberations over two days, a jury acquitted the Greece man in the shooting death of Christopher Cervini, 17, last April.
“I just want to say thank you to the people who believed in me, who stood by me,â€ Scott said following the verdict. â€œI still have my regrets for the Cervini family; it’s still an unfortunate situation for them. I am happy that at least this chapter is over.”
As deliberations dragged on over two days and the jury asked for testimony to be read back, Scott admits he didn’t know how it would all turn out.
“I was nervous of course,â€ he said. â€œYou never know what direction this whole thing is going to turn, so I have no idea. But it worked out and I feel that justice (was) served today.”
Cervini’s family members say justice wasn’t served. They say Christopher was murdered in cold blood, that he’d never been in trouble and Scott acted as judge, jury and executioner.
Christopher Cervini, 17
Scott says he acted in self defense when he confronted Cervini and two others saying they were stealing from neighbors cars. He told them he had a gun and ordered them to freeze and wait for police.
Scott says he shot Cervini twice when the victim charged toward him yelling he was going to get Scott. [...]
Back story here.
Michael Filozof at American Thinker reported on this case in March of 2012:
Unlike Florida, New York does not have a “stand your ground” law. New York law allows a person to use deadly force to defend his residence from home invasion only as a last resort. It does not allow the use of deadly force to prevent a property crime, and requires retreat if possible. Thus, while Zimmerman was not arrested under Florida law, Scott was tried for manslaughter.
New York law does allow a person to use deadly force anywhere, including off his own property, if he feels that his life is in imminent danger and retreat is not possible. Despite the fact that he left his own property, confronted, and shot dead an unarmed white person thought to be committing a petty property crime, Scott was acquitted by a majority-white jury after claiming that the Cervini charged at him, putting him in imminent fear of his life.
Despite the racial difference between the shooter and the decedent, there were no allegations of racial bias. Scott was not charged with a hate crime. There was no Federal civil rights investigation. There were no white protests. The case was settled for what it was: a tragedy caused by a series of poor decisions on behalf of the shooter, and a split-second decision that will forever be second-guessed.
Continue reading >>>
Linked at Fire Andrea Mitchell…thanks!
Related: Before There Was â€˜Justice For Trayvonâ€™ In 2010 George Zimmerman Launched â€˜Justice For Sherman Wareâ€™ A Black Homeless Man Knocked Unconscious By White Man [Video Of The Assault]