A time when America’s representatives were [real] men and not:

“Anti-American, limp-wristed, hand-wringing, gutless, yellow-bellied, lily-livered, spineless, sycophant enablers of genocidal, islamic supremacist, terrorist, primitive, ignorant, backward, evil savages (who want to kill us, have killed us, and are plotting to kill us again at every opportunity)”.

Cast your gaze upon this country’s oldest war memorial; the Tripoli Monument (fantastic photo set) Erected in honor of the fallen in the 1st Barbary War. The [very] first defensive war between the United States and Islamic Muslim Jihadists (circa 1800′s), AKA the Barbary Pirates.

Santiago Matamoros at the Amillennialist Contra Mundum blog writes:

America’s oldest military monument, carved of marble from a quarry used by Michelangelo. Dedicated to those who perished in our Republic’s first War of Self-Defense Against Allah, the First Barbary War.
……
Interesting images on the monument dedicated to defending America against jihad.
Are those Buddhists? After all, why would Religionists of Peace appear on an American war memorial?
……
Obama says, “Respect Islam.” Paul says, “It’s our fault.” Romney says, “There’s nothing inherently violent about Islam.” That’s utter nescience (or worse, treason).

‘Respect’ the ‘inherently violent’ totalitarian ideology Islam, because it’s entirely ‘our fault‘ that a power hungry, barbaric warlord in the making –Mohammed, stumbled out of a cave centuries ago with plans to conquer the globe by spreading his false religion Islam –at the point of a sword. I think I’ll pass…

Cowards bowing to Islam, the –enemy within.

This Thomas Jefferson quote from Family Security Matters adds context:

“We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretensions to make war upon a Nation who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our Friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.
The Ambassador [Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, Tripoli’s Ambassador to London. --Ed.] answered us that it…

…was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim]who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.

- Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826), writing on March 28, 1786. A photograph of the letter can be seen here.
Continue reading >>>

Bold emphasis mine.

Also see:

Ellison, Jefferson and Jihadi Pirates ..Oh My!

Winston Churchill On Islam

The Top Three Things You Need To Know About Islam Before It Affects You

List of Islamic Terror Attacks on American Soil

Andrew Mc Carthy’s ‘Obama Revisionism: Adams and Jefferson, Friends of Islam‘

Naval History Blog: ‘Our Oldest Naval Memorial: The Tripoli Monument‘

Raymond Ibrahim’s ‘Bill Clinton’s Jihad Ignorance‘

Lossing’s Field Book of the War of 1812

(Related posts below, automatically generated)

And the truth about Democrat racism on the House floor.

Respect.

rightscoop

Free your mind, the rest will follow…

Speaking ‘truth to power’.

Black History Month just another form of segregation.

DNC Debbie Wasserman to Minorities: Your “Natural Home” Is On The Democrat Plantation

Reward!! Capture and Return Runaways From The Democrat Party’s Liberal Plantation

Pull quote:

“President Obama does not seem to see the problem. The Obama policy of courting the Muslim Brotherhood has not changed the Brothers. It has empowered them to advance their anti-American program.”

(encounterbooks) –The real threat to the United States is not terrorism. The real threat is the sophisticated forces of Islamism, which have collaborated with the American Left not only to undermine U.S. national security but to shred the fabric of American constitutional democracy. In The Grand Jihad, bestselling author Andrew C. McCarthy provides a harrowing account of how the global Islamist movement’s jihad involves far more than terrorist attacks, and how it has found the ideal partner in President Barack Obama, whose Islamist sympathies run deep.

McCarthy is the former federal prosecutor who convicted the notorious “Blind Sheikh” and other jihadists for waging a terrorist war that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In his national bestseller, Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad (Encounter 2008), he explored government’s conscious avoidance of the terrorist threat, which made the nation vulnerable to mass-murder attacks. In The Grand Jihad he exposes a more insidious peril: government’s active concealment of the Islamist ideology that unabashedly vows to “conquer America.” With the help of witting and unwitting accomplices in and out of government, Islamism doesn’t merely fuel terrorism but spawns America-hating Islamic enclaves in our midst and gradually foists Islam’s repressive law, sharia, on American life. The revolutionary doctrine has made common cause with an ascendant Left that also seeks radical transformation of our constitutional order. The prognosis for liberty could not be more dire.

Also see:

FOIA Doc Dump Divulges How Obama’s DOJ Prostrates To The Muslim Brotherhood

Raymond Ibrahim (Middle East specialist and Associate fellow, Middle East Forum) testified before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission in the House of Representatives.

Reps. Frank Wolf and James McDermott presented:

“Under Threat: The Worsening Plight of Egypt’s Coptic Christians.”

securefreedom

securefreedom

Read Mr. Ibrahim’s testimony at the Center for Security Policy here.

What Arab Civilization?

"Arab/Islamic civilization is not a progressive force, it is a regressive force; it does not give impetus, it retards."

This letter was sent to Carly Fiorina, CEO of Hewlett Packard Corporation, in response to a speechgiven by her on September 26, 2001.

[Note the date of Fiorina's speech, as it is extremely significant, being a mere 15 days AFTER 9/11. 2,977 people died on that horrid day, and yet Fiorina thought it best to glorify the culture of death and destruction that was the foundation of 9/11 terror --only 2 weeks later, with mistruths. --Ed]

---

November 7, 2001

Carly Fiorina
Hewlett-Packard
3000 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1185

Dear Madame Fiorina:

It is with great interest that I read your speech delivered on September 26, 2001, titled “Technology, Business and Our way of Life: What’s Next” [sic]. I was particularly interested in the story you told at the end of your speech, about the Arab/Muslim civilization. As an Assyrian, a non-Arab, Christian native of the Middle East, whose ancestors reach back to 5000 B.C., I wish to clarify some points you made in this little story, and to alert you to the dangers of unwittingly being drawn into the Arabist/Islamist ideology, which seeks to assimilate all cultures and religions into the Arab/Islamic fold.

I know you are a very busy woman, but please find ten minutes to read what follows, as it is a perspective that you will not likely get from anywhere else. I will answer some of the specific points you made in your speech, then conclude with a brief perspective on this Arabist/Islamist ideology.

Arabs and Muslims appeared on the world scene in 630 A.D., when the armies of Muhammad began their conquest of the Middle East. We should be very clear that this was a military conquest, not a missionary enterprise, and through the use of force, authorized by a declaration of a Jihad against infidels, Arabs/Muslims were able to forcibly convert and assimilate non-Arabs and non-Mulsims into their fold. Very few indigenous communities of the Middle East survived this — primarily Assyrians, Jews, Armenians and Coptics (of Egypt).

Having conquered the Middle East, Arabs placed these communities under a Dhimmi (see the book Dhimmi, by Bat Ye’Or) system of governance, where the communities were allowed to rule themselves as religious minorities (Christians, Jews and Zoroastrian). These communities had to pay a tax (called a Jizzya in Arabic) that was, in effect, a penalty for being non-Muslim, and that was typically 80% in times of tolerance and up to 150% in times of oppression. This tax forced many of these communities to convert to Islam, as it was designed to do.

You state, “its architects designed buildings that defied gravity.” I am not sure what you are referring to, but if you are referring to domes and arches, the fundamental architectural breakthrough of using a parabolic shape instead of a spherical shape for these structures was made by the Assyrians more than 1300 years earlier, as evidenced by their archaeological record.

You state, “its mathematicians created the algebra and algorithms that would enable the building of computers, and the creation of encryption.” The fundamental basis of modern mathematics had been laid down not hundreds but thousands of years before by Assyrians and Babylonians, who already knew of the concept of zero, of the Pythagorean Theorem, and of many, many other developments expropriated by Arabs/Muslims (see History of Babylonian Mathematics, Neugebauer).

You state, “its doctors examined the human body, and found new cures for disease.” The overwhelming majority of these doctors (99%) were Assyrians. In the fourth, fifth, and sixth centuries Assyrians began a systematic translation of the Greek body of knowledge into Assyrian. At first they concentrated on the religious works but then quickly moved to science, philosophy and medicine. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Galen, and many others were translated into Assyrian, and from Assyrian into Arabic. It is these Arabic translations which the Moors brought with them into Spain, and which the Spaniards translated into Latin and spread throughout Europe, thus igniting the European Renaissance.

By the sixth century A.D., Assyrians had begun exporting back to Byzantia their own works on science, philosophy and medicine. In the field of medicine, the Bakhteesho Assyrian family produced nine generations of physicians, and founded the great medical school at Gundeshapur (Iran). Also in the area of medicine, (the Assyrian) Hunayn ibn-Ishaq’s textbook on ophthalmology, written in 950 A.D., remained the authoritative source on the subject until 1800 A.D.

In the area of philosophy, the Assyrian philosopher Job of Edessa developed a physical theory of the universe, in the Assyrian language, that rivaled Aristotle’s theory, and that sought to replace matter with forces (a theory that anticipated some ideas in quantum mechanics, such as the spontaneous creation and destruction of matter that occurs in the quantum vacuum).

One of the greatest Assyrian achievements of the fourth century was the founding of the first university in the world, the School of Nisibis, which had three departments, theology, philosophy and medicine, and which became a magnet and center of intellectual development in the Middle East. The statutes of the School of Nisibis, which have been preserved, later became the model upon which the first Italian university was based (see The Statutes of the School of Nisibis, by Arthur Voobus).

When Arabs and Islam swept through the Middle East in 630 A.D., they encountered 600 years of Assyrian Christian civilization, with a rich heritage, a highly developed culture, and advanced learning institutions. It is this civilization that became the foundation of the Arab civilization.

You state, “Its astronomers looked into the heavens, named the stars, and paved the way for space travel and exploration.” This is a bit melodramatic. In fact, the astronomers you refer to were not Arabs but Chaldeans and Babylonians (of present day south-Iraq), who for millennia were known as astronomers and astrologers, and who were forcibly Arabized and Islamized — so rapidly that by 750 A.D. they had disappeared completely.

You state, “its writers created thousands of stories. Stories of courage, romance and magic. Its poets wrote of love, when others before them were too steeped in fear to think of such things.” There is very little literature in the Arabic language that comes from this period you are referring to (the Koran is the only significant piece of literature), whereas the literary output of the Assyrians and Jews was vast. The third largest corpus of Christian writing, after Latin and Greek, is by the Assyrians in the Assyrian language (also called Syriac; see here.)

You state, “when other nations were afraid of ideas, this civilization thrived on them, and kept them alive. When censors threatened to wipe out knowledge from past civilizations, this civilization kept the knowledge alive, and passed it on to others.” This is a very important issue you raise, and it goes to the heart of the matter of what Arab/Islamic civilization represents. I reviewed a book titled How Greek Science Passed to the Arabs, in which the author lists the significant translators and interpreters of Greek science. Of the 22 scholars listed, 20 were Assyrians, 1 was Persian and 1 an Arab. I state at the end of my review: “The salient conclusion which can be drawn from O’Leary’s book is that Assyrians played a significant role in the shaping of the Islamic world via the Greek corpus of knowledge. If this is so, one must then ask the question, what happened to the Christian communities which made them lose this great intellectual enterprise which they had established. One can ask this same question of the Arabs. Sadly, O’Leary’s book does not answer this question, and we must look elsewhere for the answer.” I did not answer this question I posed in the review because it was not the place to answer it, but the answer is very clear, the Christian Assyrian community was drained of its population through forced conversion to Islam (by the Jizzya), and once the community had dwindled below a critical threshold, it ceased producing the scholars that were the intellectual driving force of the Islamic civilization, and that is when the so called “Golden Age of Islam” came to an end (about 850 A.D.).

Islam the religion itself was significantly molded by Assyrians and Jews (see Nestorian Influence on Islam and Hagarism: the Making of the Islamic World).

Arab/Islamic civilization is not a progressive force, it is a regressive force; it does not give impetus, it retards. The great civilization you describe was not an Arab/Muslim accomplishment, it was an Assyrian accomplishment that Arabs expropriated and subsequently lost when they drained, through the forced conversion of Assyrians to Islam, the source of the intellectual vitality that propelled it. What other Arab/Muslim civilization has risen since? What other Arab/Muslim successes can we cite?

You state, “and perhaps we can learn a lesson from his [Suleiman] example: It was leadership based on meritocracy, not inheritance. It was leadership that harnessed the full capabilities of a very diverse population that included Christianity, Islamic, and Jewish traditions.” In fact, the Ottomans were extremely oppressive to non-Muslims. For example, young Christian boys were forcefully taken from their families, usually at the age of 8-10, and inducted into the Janissaries, (yeniceri in Turkish) where they were Islamized and made to fight for the Ottoman state. What literary, artistic or scientific achievements of the Ottomans can we point to? We can, on the other hand, point to the genocide of 750,000 Assyrians, 1.5 million Armenians and 400,000 Greeks in World War One by the Kemalist “Young Turk” government. This is the true face of Islam.

Arabs/Muslims are engaged in an explicit campaign of destruction and expropriation of cultures and communities, identities and ideas. Wherever Arab/Muslim civilization encounters a non-Arab/Muslim one, it attempts to destroy it (as the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan were destroyed, as Persepolis was destroyed by the Ayotollah Khomeini). This is a pattern that has been recurring since the advent of Islam, 1400 years ago, and is amply substantiated by the historical record. If the “foreign” culture cannot be destroyed, then it is expropriated, and revisionist historians claim that it is and was Arab, as is the case of most of the Arab “accomplishments” you cited in your speech. For example, Arab history texts in the Middle East teach that Assyrians were Arabs, a fact that no reputable scholar would assert, and that no living Assyrian would accept. Assyrians first settled Nineveh, one of the major Assyrian cities, in 5000 B.C., which is 5630 years before Arabs came into that area. Even the word ‘Arab’ is an Assyrian word, meaning “Westerner” (the first written reference to Arabs was by the Assyrian King Sennacherib, 800 B.C., in which he tells of conquering the “ma’rabayeh” — Westerners. See The Might That Was Assyria, by H. W. F. Saggs).

Even in America this Arabization policy continues. On October 27th a coalition of seven Assyrian and Maronite organizations sent an official letter to the Arab American Institute asking it to stop identifying Assyrians and Maronites as Arabs, which it had been deliberately doing.

There are minorities and nations struggling for survival in the Arab/Muslim ocean of the Middle East and Africa (Assyrians, Armenians, Coptics, Jews, southern Sudanese, Ethiopians, Nigerians…), and we must be very sensitive not to unwittingly and inadvertently support Islamic fascism and Arab Imperialism, with their attempts to wipe out all other cultures, religions and civilizations. It is incumbent upon each one of us to do our homework and research when making statements and speeches about these sensitive matters.

I hope you found this information enlightening. For more information, refer to the web links below.

Thank you for your consideration.

Peter BetBasoo

Web resources:

Brief History of Assyrians
Assyrian International News Agency
Assyrian American National Federation
Assyrian Academic Society
Zinda Magazine
Beth Suryoyo
Nineveh Online
World Maronite Union
Maronite Research Council
World Lebanese Organization
Coptic Web

H/T andilinks

Can the West be saved?

Also see:

• Early Islamic Conquest: Islamic Crusades – A Time Line
• Islam 101: A Lexicon For Dummies
• Sharia for Dummies
• Winston Churchill On Islam
• Video: Geert Wilders Warning to America
• Video: Islam -What the West Needs to Know

The bitch slap heard ’round the world.

Bibi’s lecture was in direct response to:

So while the core issues of the conflict must be negotiated, the basis of those negotiations is clear: a viable Palestine, a secure Israel. The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine. We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.

~Barack Obama — Middle East Speech May 19, 2011

Catching the Obama completely off guard, Bibi seizes a golden opportunity to enlighten him.

1967 lines are indefensible

“It’s not gonna happen”

Even if Israel was reduced down to the size of one square mile. Islam would still attack. Like it or not, believe it or not. It is a fact.
Peace negotiations with Palestine are a monumental waste of time. There is no [real] peace with Islam.

Update: Speaking of Israel, Obama and Palestine. This would be an excellent time to demand [once again] that the LA Times release the suppressed Obama/Kahalidi tape.

Update 2:

“In the pre-1967 borders, Israel was barely ten miles wide at its narrowest point. The bulk of Israel’s population lived within artillery range of hostile armies. I am not about to ask Israel to live that way again.”
~President Ronald Reagan, September 1, 1982

Update 3:

NY Times:

While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel reacted sharply to the president’s proposal, the reality is that the course Mr. Obama outlined Thursday was much more modest than what some of his advisers initially advocated.

Dear Lord in heaven. “More modest than what some of his advisers initially advocated.”?? I shudder to think what those proposals may have been.

Previously:

• Congressman Allen West Response to Obama’s Call for a Two State Solution in Israel
• Transcript & Video: Obama Middle East Speech –May 19,2011

Related:

• Video: Netanyahu Slams U.N. for Giving Ahmadinejad Forum: ‘Have You No Shame?
• Transcript: Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu UN General Assembly Speech 9-24-09
• Video: Flashback –Obama Advisor Samantha Power Called for a Military Invasion of Israel
• U.N. Chief Ban Ki-moon ‘End Occupation, Divide Jerusalem’
• GZM Imam Feisal: “In a true peace, Israel will, in our lifetimes, become one more Arab country, with a Jewish minority”
• Palestinian Authority TV Quiz Show Erases Israel: Nazareth is Palestinian [Video]
• Netanyahu Defies Team Obama’s Demands To Halt Building Of Jerusalem Settlements
• Obama Admin State Dept Settlement Freeze To Include Jerusalem
• Obama Plays the “Hussein” Card Against Suspicious Israelis

Read the entire book online. The following text is author Sujit Das’ forward.

 

"This book is dedicated to: The Human Race Whose march towards perfection has been disrupted by some devious imposters who pose as direct spokesmen of God to fool and misguide a large number of people."

A Note to the Readers

Islam stands or falls on the credibility of Muhammad on which we do not have single evidence but unfathomable doubts because his conduct was immoral. But he successfully twisted the sense of morality of his followers, distorted their sense of ‘Humanness’ and linked “doing good” and “a service to God” to all ungodly things. Briefly, he had given a sacred aura to crime and terrorism.

Was Muhammad truthful and sincere when he claimed to the title of prophet? Or, was he a vulgar imposter, who posed as a prophet with his eyes upon a throne from the beginning? Where we can find some concrete evidence that Qur’anic revelations were not Muhammad’s delusions or his conscious fabrications?
Where is the ‘divine’ verification for ‘divine’ revelations? If we put the Qur’an in chronological order and correlate it with the context of Muhammad’s life as was reported in Sira, Sunnah and Hadith we find Allah mirrored Muhammad’s character. Allah was too dumb to be God and too immoral to be Divine.

In this treatise I have no intention to test God. I just want to test Muhammad’s claim to the
title of messenger of God because I cannot blindly accept his claim. Throughout the
recorded history of Mankind, many imposters had posed as God-man and fooled us.
Muhammad may be a true prophet or he may be an imposter. We must test him to see
which he is. Anyone who claims to be a prophet must be prepared to have his prophecy
tested.

This treatise is a critical investigation, where I have probed deep into the strange imaginary
fantasy world of Muhammad not only in search of an answer but also to unfold many mysteries
of Islam and Muslims. First, I had looked at Muhammad through the spectacle of blind faith and
then through the spectacle of science, logic and modern development of Psychological and
Mental Disorder studies. This document contains the findings of my investigation.

When an investigation is done in any intellectual field, no investigator can claim that his
academic research work is complete in every respect and the conclusions are final. It is always
like an open loop and there is constantly a scope for further research. I sincerely hope that the
enthusiastic readers (both Muslim and non-Muslim) with further investigation will come out with more interesting facts on different aspects of the same topic.

This document is heavy reading, and lengthy. I ask for reader’s patience on this.

Thank you.

Sujit Das (e-mail: counter.jihad (at) yahoo.co.uk)

Mumbai (India)
28.04.2010

————————————————————-

This book is under no copyright Law. You may translate, publish and distribute this book by any means and without any legal restriction or prior permission, but at least let me know by sending me a mail counter.jihad (at) yahoo.co.uk

Sujit Das’ on “Unmasking Muhammad The Malignant Narcissist and His Grand Delusion Allah” –here, more of his work here.

Bio: So far I have written fourteen articles which had been published in various websites, as example, FFI, Islam-Watch, Islam-monitor, Mukto-mona, Allied apostates of Islam, Vinnomot. Some of my articles are well appreciated by readers and translated to other languages on the Internet.

Connect with Sijit Das on Facebook.

In closing, a newly unveiled Bosch Fawstin treat. Just in case you have ever wondered and you know you have – What Does Mohammad Look Like Unmasked?

Related:

• “Understanding Obama: The Making of a Fuehrer”
• Winston Churchill On Islam
• Muslims Victims of Majority of Hate Crimes? Not According to FBI Anti-Religion Hate Crime Stats
• Nonie Darwish: Former Muslims Excluded From King Hearings
• Iranian Born Amil Imani: “Dear Rep. King Forget “Radical” — Islam is the Culprit”
• Video: Geert Wilders Warning to America
• Lt. Colonel Allen West’s Speech At FDI CPAC Event Jihad: The Political Third Rail–What They Are Not Telling You [Full Video]

Bill Ayers parents were “helping out a brilliant young black man,” and Bernadine Dohrn Ayers’ wife lived with her in laws for “several months” during the same time period. (more on that in a bit) So it stands to reason that their son Bill Ayers knew Obama earlier than he has previously claimed.

First let’s refresh our memories on the Obama camp spin regarding his connection to Bill Ayers.

Obama campaign manager David Axelrod and other campaign surrogates are now furtively trying to claim today that Obama “didn’t know the history” of Ayers and Dohrn as the leaders of America’s most infamous left-wing terrorist group when Obama met at their home for a political “coming out” in 1995, but their attempt to make pretend that Barack Obama didn’t know of their terrorist past is laughable.

By 1995, Barack Obama had known Bill Ayers at least eight years since their shared involvement in the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools, if not longer. Bernardine Dohrn, once labeled “the most dangerous woman in America” by none other than J. Edgar Hoover, was also well known as the inspiration for the 1988 movie Running on Empty. Subtle terrorists they were not.

As noted in the New York Times, Obama has tried to minimize his relationship with Ayers, dismissing him as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” and “somebody who worked on education issues in Chicago that I know.”

Axelrod also tried to excuse the extent of Obama’s involvement with Ayers, stating, “Bill Ayers lives in his neighborhood. Their kids attend the same school. … They’re certainly friendly, they know each other, as anyone whose kids go to school together.”

It’s an obvious fiction pitched by Axelrod, since the Obama children are presently in elementary school, while Ayers’ children are all grown adults, but the Ayers-Obama family connection doesn’t stop at the imaginary connections between the children.
……
Barack Obama’s first known meetings with Bill Ayers would occur three years after Obama graduated from Columbia, in Chicago in 1987. Ayers was an activist in the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools. Community organizer Barack Obama’s Developing Communities Project was a member of that Alliance.

Barack Obama was not eight, but a 24-year-old community organizer in Chicago at the time of the Weathermen’s last attacks, and 29 when many of the last remnants of the Underground in the offshoot May 19th Communist Organization were sentenced to prison in 1990. (Former Weatherman Elizabeth Ann Duke is still a fugitive and wanted by the FBI.)

BarackObama.com, the campaign’s official website, offers up a “fact check” that Obama was just eight years old when the Weathermen were active in 1969. The Obama campaign has tried to use the founding date of the Weathermen as a touchstone, claiming that the acts of the group were something that happened “40 years ago” when Obama was a child. Far closer to the truth is the December 6, 1990, sentencing date of Weathermen Susan Rosenberg and Linda Sue Evans, when the last of the Weathermen were sentenced for their role in a string of bombings in the mid-1980s…

You know as well as I people lie when the have something to hide, are guilty, ashamed, or all of the above. And the Misinformer in Chief has plenty to hide and has spun a cacophony of lies in order to cover his tracks.  So even [if] Obama is not completely ‘down with’ Ayers political philosophy, his judgment is faulty and he could never be considered trustworthy. Yeah, yeah, yeah I know pols lie but usually when the truth is beaming from a neon sign they cave and spill the beans. Remember this is not just a little white lie, this is about Obama’s bold faced lie concerning his close relationship with an ‘unrepentant domestic terrorist‘. (Much more at link.)

Now on to the personal relationship between Obama and Ayers’ parents Tom and Mary. I had only just recently stumbled across this jaw dropping news.

Stephen Diamond writing at King Harvest:

Barack Obama visited the house of Tom and Mary Ayers, parents of former Weather Underground activist turned education professor Bill Ayers, in the mid-1980s to thank the Ayers’ for their support of his education, according to Allen Hulton, the letter carrier who delivered mail to the Ayers’ Glen Ellyn home at that time. Glen Ellyn is a suburb of Chicago, southwest of the city.

Hulton spoke to King Harvest at length about his experience. The statement by Hulton is the first eyewitness account of a possible relationship between Obama and Tom Ayers and the first that dates his relationship with the Ayers family to the mid-1980s.
……
At the time of their encounter, Hulton recalls, Obama “looked about 19 years old” but was probably in his early 20s. Obama graduated from Columbia University in 1983 and moved to Chicago in 1985 at age 24 or 25 to head up the DCP, a fledgling community organization modeled after similar groups started by Saul Alinsky, on the south side of Chicago. The DCP had secured a grant from the Woods Fund, endowed by the Woods family, to finance the hiring of Obama.

……

“Mrs. Ayers told me that her family had been helping out a brilliant young black man,” Hulton said and whom he believes she said was from Kenya. Hulton said that over the period of six to ten years that he delivered mail to the Ayers home he had numerous conversations with Mrs. Ayers, one conversation with Thomas Ayers and several brief encounters with Bernardine Dohrn (Bill’s wife) who he said lived at the home for several months at one point in time. He never met or saw Bill Ayers at the home.

Hulton explained that he knew Tim Ayers, the son of Tom and brother of Bill, when they were both students at Glenbard High School, which draws students from the towns of Glen Ellyn and Lombard, Illinois. Over time the Ayers’ parents became aware of the connection to their son Tim and that led to a friendlier relationship between Hulton and Tom and Mary Ayers.

“They tipped me generously at Christmastime,” Hulton recalled.

One day Hulton found himself on the sidewalk outside the Ayers home at 199 N. Montclair Avenue near the corner of Revere Road just after he had delivered the mail. The house was “very nice and attractive and more expensive than some in Glen Ellyn because it was closer to downtown, but it did not stand out among the houses on that block.” He said the largest and most expensive homes were actually on Revere, around the corner from the Ayers’ home.

As Hulton was on the sidewalk walking away from the Ayers house a tall and thin young black man was coming up the same sidewalk towards the Ayers house.

Hulton recalls that Obama said hello and introduced himself and stopped to chat with him in front of the Ayers house. “I recall that his ears stuck out a little bit. He was more gaunt then than he appears now. His name was an unusual one and when I saw his photo during the campaign it brought back my memory of the event,” Hulton said.

Mr. Obama explained that he had taken the train out from Chicago to visit the Ayers’ in order to thank them for their help with his “education.” At this time, Mr. Obama had recently graduated from Columbia and would soon enter Harvard Law School. Hulton and Obama “spoke for a few minutes, first chatting about the Ayers family,” Hulton said. Hulton said he did not learn whether the help Obama received from the Ayers’ was financial or in some other form. [...]

This is my third piece on the Bill Ayers, Barack Obama connection in a weeks time. Though some may scoff that I am beating a dead horse, I say we are heading into what has the makings of an extremely heated, highly contested primary season for the upcoming November mid-terms, so the Ayers-Obama horse needs to be resuscitated. As I am determined to do my part to bring the tie between the two back up to the front burner. I want their relationship to be if not on everyone’s lips, at least on everyone’s minds as they walk into the voting booth. As we have learned the hard way, ‘elections have consequences’.

So how about much more ‘truth’ and a lot less ‘consequences’?

Ken Moore links at Metanoodle…thanks!

Related:

• Video: Undercover FBI Informant Who Infiltrated Bill Ayers’ Weatherman Underground Exposes Their Plans of Re-Education Camps & Genocide
• Read online — PRAIRIE FIRE – Bill Ayers’ Weather Underground Communist Manifesto
• [Doc Drop] 1976 Declassified FBI Intel: Bill Ayers Weather Underground (Weatherman)
• Obama A Disturbing Enigma Wrapped in an Unsettling Mystery

In 1976, the FBI's Chicago Field Office prepared a summary which described the activities of the Weather Underground Organization, also known as Weathermen. This organization described itself as a revolutionary organization of communist men and women. The FBI's analysis of its motivations, beliefs, and international travels are outlined in this summary.

Part one , Part two ,Part three , Part four , Part five , Part six

Background material: (SDS) Students for a Democratic Society, (WUO) Weather Underground Org, (Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Venceremos Brigades, Jesus Jiminez Escobar, (NLG) National Lawyers Guild

Special thanks to C02Hog for leading me to the files. Who by the way has an excellent video on his hosting site ‘Tuber Vision‘ detailing the history of Bill Ayers’ Weather Underground “The Lowdown on The Weathermen” here. Also see, “FBI Report: Ayers/Weather Underground Aided By Cuba” at Nice Deb.

Why am I posting this information on a bunch of left-wing extremist radicals from days gone by? Well for one because Barack Obama the sitting president of the United States has been associated with the Weather Underground’s founding members Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn who are but part of a nasty web of anti-American, communist, socialist, radical leftist individuals and organizations which all can be directly connected to him. And any information revealing his extreme anti-American connections can not be spread far and wide enough. And two, Americans need to be educated on BHO’s background since the complacent sycophantic MSM refuses to do it’s job. We must press forward and continue to expose BHO for who/what he truly is, if we have any hopes in saving this great country from the disastrous Obama Effect.

Which brings me to; during the 2008 Presidential campaign Barack Obama told audiences, “Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself.”

Fine BHO have it your way, we will.

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

Yet, no one to my knowledge has yet connected all the dots between Barack Obama and the Radical Left. When seen together, the influences on Obama’s life comprise a who’s who of the radical leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life deeply immersed in it.

But even this doesn’t fully describe the extreme nature of this candidate. He can be tied directly to a malevolent overarching strategy that has motivated many, if not all, of the most destructive radical leftist organizations in the United States since the 1960s.
…..

The chart puts Barack Obama at the epicenter of an incestuous stew of American radical leftism. Not only are his connections significant, they practically define who he is. Taken together, they constitute a who’s who of the American radical left, and guiding all is the Cloward-Piven strategy.

Conspicuous in their absence are any connections at all with any other group, moderate, or even mildly leftist. They are all radicals, firmly bedded in the anti-American, communist, socialist, radical leftist mesh.

~ Remember in November – November or Never ~

Update:

Obama: Bill Ayers “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood” Hmm…

Obama and Dohrn and Ayers, Behind the Annenberg Gate: Inside the Chicago Annenberg Challenge Records, Barack Obama, Bill Ayers and Mike Klonsky, The Three Marxist Amigos, Obama’s ultra-leftist backers

Related:

• Video: Undercover FBI Informant Who Infiltrated Bill Ayers’ Weatherman Underground Exposes Their Plans of Re-Education Camps & Genocide
• [Doc Drop] Prairie Fire: The Communist Manifesto Of Bill Ayers’ Weather Underground
• Dear POTUS
• The Tie That Binds Barack Obama With Former PLO Operative Rashid Khalidi
• Vanity of Vanities — What is Crooked Can Not Be Made Straight
• [Doc Drop]Van Jones (Obama’s Former Green Jobs Czar): “Reclaiming Revolution: history, summation & lessons from the work of Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM)”

I had created a playlist of all four videos but for some reason I can not get the code to work. So I had no choice but to embed each video separately. Which will cause the page to load a bit slower than usual.  But if you haven’t had a chance to see this Beck episode I highly recommend it. Beck digs up historical bones long buried and brings them to light.

*Partial transcript. It does not mesh with video until the very end of part 2

Yesterday, we began with Woodrow Wilson laying out the staples of progressivism which when we had up and we’re having technical difficulties with some of our screens tonight. So, we’re writing them on the chalkboard. We got so many chalkboards. We’re running on another chalkboard. I’ll give it to you in a second because you need to see it.

But basically here they are — because Wilson, FDR and Obama are doing it. And that is these things. One, the government elite knows best. The public is uninformed and incapable of choosing what’s best for them or the society on whole.

True public opinion is denied. Alternate realities are created and presented as truth — propaganda.

So, they know better. Your opinion doesn’t matter. They’ll just teach it to you through propaganda.

The second thing is: voices of oppositions are discredited, intimidated, bribed, or eliminated.

Number three thing you have to know: Progressives use war or the moral equivalent of war, a global warming crisis, or an economic crisis — that way they can push their progressive agenda through, which includes suspension of basic rights. Because remember, you’re not smart enough. They’ll take care of it. Never waste a good crisis. The ends justify the means.

The other thing is they always view the Constitution as an organic document. It’s outdated in its original form and you just have to be open to modern, I mean, modern interpretations. Hello, progress! I’m not going to tolerate those who want to stand in the way of progress. Have you heard that before?

You got to give the president now, he gave us — he gave us the new deal. You know, you hold the cards now, and you deal, you know, you just — you just got to keep going here. I mean, I don’t — I don’t even — I don’t even know what they’re even talking about. Somehow or another, the president will give us what we ask for, and just going to have to pay him back with our loyalty I guess.

Give a man a job was one of the songs back — one of the songs back during the FDR administration. Can we even play the song? We can’t, can we? We can’t play the song?

Jimmy Durante did this movie for FDR where he was — he said, give a man a job. Give a man a job. What are you going to do? You got to give a man a job. It’s propaganda.

OK. So, we laid the following staples of progressivism out yesterday. Now, let’s — now let’s look here. With FDR — where did — where did he go? Well, the first thing he did was he went to the individuals. He wanted to target individuals.

What did Wilson do? He made a list of dangerous Americans. Remember, this is for the war, dangerous Americans. If you’re not a danger, you can really help out.

This was the economy first. So, he needed a list of dangerous Americans. This is a list of dangerous Americans. He had to target them because they were stealing from the American people.

One of them was Andrew Mellon, former treasury of the secretary for Harding and Coolidge. Wait a minute, wasn’t he — so he was the guy who designed the 1920 recovery. He designed the economy to roar the way it did. Anti-progressive. Coolidge — Anti-progressive. He’s a guy who was a hero in 1921, but a staunch opponent of the New Deal.

So, FDR used the IRS to investigate Mellon. He said that he was a tax cheat. He went on all the time and said this man is cheating Americans. He’s stealing from American taxpayers. Well, the press ate that up. The only problem with it is it’s totally untrue, fabricated. I mean, it went all the way to the Supreme Court.

I mean, at one point, they said the man paid his taxes. If you want him to pay for taxes, then you have to pass a law, but he paid it. In fact, he actually overpaid the taxes in the time they were investigating him, just to make sure.

That wasn’t enough. After it was thrown out of court, FDR went on the radio and said, “I’m telling you he’s a bad man.” Destroy and discredit.

Also, the publisher of the Philadelphia Daily News was another one. One of the loudest anti-FDR voices of his time, put in prison following a similar investigation, ordered by FDR.

What was next on this? Oh, yes. DOJ used to — was used to set up prison camps under Wilson. Here we have it here, internment camps. FDR did the same in war.

More than 100,000 Asians in America, the overwhelming majority of them were U.S. citizens. They were imprisoned without any due process. Property was lost, lives were destroyed.

They were citizens — citizens — of the United States. Put them in internment camps. Citizens of the United States put in prison camps. We’ve done it twice now and it’s a progressive that did it.

The next one, this was ban German books and German classes and language of hate. Well, again, if this is the boot, if you’re going to launder it and learn from your mistakes, this has become a shove. You don’t just ban books, what you do is you review and edit things like Hollywood scripts. You start to edit the textbooks. You start to slowly change them. Make progress.

FDR actually would pressure reporters to change their stories. He would — he would go in to people’s office and say, what are you working on? And the reporter would be there in the White House and he said, oh, Mr. President, I’m working on this. And he would sit down with them and say, hmm, can I make a suggestion? I mean, if I were you, I’d — I might take a different angle on that.

They got the message, most times, they’d change the story. Hollywood always had to change everything. I mean, every script went through the Office of War — Office of War Information, the brains trust. It went right through their hands.

Nelson Poynter, he was the guy who looked at everything. It had to — it had to be approved. Every word about America — every word about the government had to be approved. It was common practice — common practice for them to change the Hollywood scripts.

OK. So, we have making lists of dangerous individuals. We have setting up prison camps and putting people through with no due process. We have banning the books or reviewing books and Hollywood scripts for propaganda reasons and also pressure to have reporters change their stories. We have that.

Now, the next one. Do we have the Red Cross banning or excusing and promoting P.C. violence? We’ll show next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BECK: Wow! We have so much information for you. Take notes. Take notes.

Government elite knows best. Voices of opposition need to be discredited. Progressives use war, war to push agenda. Progressives can see the Constitution as open to interpretation. It’s an old dusty document.

We’ve taken you now and shown you the first real evil president I think we ever had, Woodrow Wilson. For war purposes in 1917, did all of these things.

We’re looking for connections now to FDR, but laundered from the boot to a shove, he learned. In the office, this one was the Committee on Public Information. This one is the brains trust, the Office of War Information. Keyword: “information.”

We showed you that they made a list of dangerous Americans and made a list of individuals to target. Used the DOJ to set up prison camps, put people in prison and took their rights. Here, internment camps, took their rights. This one, banned books and German classes. This one reviewed Hollywood scripts, pressure on reporters to change the story.

Four, Red Cross ban German-Americans. German and Italians had curfews and travel restrictions. Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, approximately 600,000 Italian legal aliens in the United States were placed under these restrictions — the same kind of restrictions that were prohibitions on travel for more than five miles from your home. Curfew — if you were Italian or German, you couldn’t leave your house from 8:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.

Confiscation of short-wave radios, firearm, camera, flashlight and other signaling devices. Evacuation from any coastal town.

German faced similar restrictions like curfews, confiscation of personal property, travel restrictions, evacuation from coastal towns.

OK. So it could never happen. We’ve done it twice now in the last 100 years.

Number five, excused and promoted P.C. violence. See if you can find the violence. We couldn’t find it in the short time we have today.

NRA boycott. That’s not the National Rifle Association. That’s the Recovery Act. That’s the Blue Eagles. Do you remember that? We do our part.

The Blue Eagle, it was voluntary business. OK? It was — everybody was told, hey, you know, do your part. You want to do your part? You get the Blue Eagle on your — but then it turned into something more hideous where you were boycotted and they were encouraged to boycott anybody who didn’t have the Blue Eagle.

The NRA propaganda, it never ended. The NRA teamed up with Hollywood for propaganda purposes. Do we have the featurette? Can we play it? No.

OK. Show the full screen. There it is. The NRA. It’s a featurette, patriotically contributed by the motion picture industry. OK?

Now, the next was engaged in Four Minute Men. You have that with the NRA propaganda.

Then, Woodrow Wilson you had: read private telegrams. Well, here, you had giant fishing expedition and broad subpoenas. It was — it was amazing! They put these broad subpoenas out to quiet the number of grassroots opposition groups all around the country.

FDR ordered Senator Hugo Black to look for funding violations. Blanket illegal subpoenas were issued. Privacy rights trampled. It didn’t matter.

I mean, I read something from Molly (ph), I read his book. I can’t remember the name of it. Reading that, reading personal diaries of people that worked with FDR said it didn’t matter. It didn’t matter to him. Why didn’t it matter?

The ends justify the means. The ends justify the means. You could do anything. Here, we’re spying on Americans, against neighbor against neighbor. When he said, you know, OK, you should haven’t done that with Hugo Black, he said, don’t worry about it.

The ends justify the means. We’re hearing that now, because that’s not only FDR. It’s not only Woodrow Wilson, but that is also Saul Alinsky. The ends justify the means — you just get it done. We’ll pole vault if we have to — Nancy Pelosi.

Now, let me tie these together when we come back. You’ve seen the boot. You’ve seen the shove.

Let me show you the nudge — been laundered again. We have the Committee on Public Information. We have the Office of War Information. Let me introduce you to OIRA — next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BECK: America, we’re going to a different summer because there’s a lot of history that is being erased and I see our kids honestly as clay pots. Our kids need to be — the clay pot the Dead Sea scrolls were put in.

We need to put the information in them. And they need to understand it and know it, because it’s al being erased. It’s being erased and controlled the way it has always done, except I think it’s three strikes and you’re out. I think this is it. If we don’t pay attention, this is it.

We showed you Wilson. We showed you how his office of — or his Committee on Public Information worked, the Office of War Information.

Now, let me show you Cass Sunstein. He is the head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OK? He said that he’s dreamed of this gig all his life.

Why? If you know what this office has done in the past, why would you want that?

If you think bad things can’t happen in America, much of it already has. We’ve already built the concentration camps. We’ve built them in two administrations. And we’re mirroring these administrations now.

Did you read the book “Phillip Dru: Administrator” last night? Did you find that? You can find it on the Internet. It’s free. Find it. Go to GlennBeck.com. I think we have it there.

Let me go through the points here now what Barack Obama is doing. OK. Made a list of dangerous Americans — those were German. Make a list of individuals that were target, they were dangerous, that were the capitalists then.

Who’s this administration afraid of now? I can tell you right now. It’s the evil banker. If there’s a list, we can make it. The evil bankers, the tea partygoers — they’re dangerous, they’re possible terrorists.

The GOP, you got — what’s his name? Deval Patrick up in Boston saying this week that, you know, this is like sedition. You also have Fox.

You can make the list, the list of individuals to target, the list of dangerous Americans. It’s there. You know it.

The DOJ, here, the DOJ set up prison camps. Here, the DOJ had internment camps. No due process. That was the key here. No due process. No due process here for Americans. Miranda rights, no due process.

Our new Supreme Court justice, Kagan, actually said, if you’re suspected of financing terror — suspected — you’re a citizen off the battlefield. They can pick you up and hold you indefinitely without due process or trial. Prison camps, prison camps, no due process — no prison camps.

Next one: ban books. This one was reviewed and edited Hollywood scripts and put pressure to change stories. This one is amazing, because what did this guy do? It was, what, 1936. Is it ’36 that he did the FCC Communications Act? Yes, 1934. Sorry. 1934 Communications Act.

We’re opening up the 1934 Communications Act now. We’re talking now about net neutrality. We’re talking about giving more money to PBS. We are opening up the ownership and the localism laws.

We also have a president — have you ever heard this? The president saying, Hey, you should read The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post — really? Really?

OK. Now, the fourth one — the fourth one here is Red Cross ban German Americans from participating in the Red Cross. Here we have, on the fourth one, was Germans, Italians had curfew and travel restrictions.

Here, if you are not a member of the union, you’re no longer going to be able to get a contract. You don’t get a piece of the government pie. If you don’t behave the way you — you’re out!

Next one, five: engage if Four Minute Men. They infiltrate citizen groups, intimidated the press. I’m sorry, no, five is excuse and promoted P.C. violence. Remember what happened here?

They actually lynched a guy, and it was OK. They dismissed it. Tar and feathered a guy for whispering a prayer in a dying woman’s ear in German. He was tarred and feathered. It was OK. Patriotic duty.

Number five here was the NRA’s boycotts. Here we’ve got the violence again. We have SEIU.

How about the Panthers? How about the Panthers? Engaged and infiltrated the citizens, intimidated the press, engaged in Four Minute Men.

Back here, propaganda. Here, propaganda. Here, Green Week on NBC.

We have Gibbs this week intimidating the press. Stop asking the president, stop asking the president about the oil thing.

How about this one? The NEA art. You remember this? We showed you this. They denied it. NEA art.

Remember when we had — who was it? What was her name, Tiffany? Buffy Wicks. I knew it was a stupid name. Buffy Wicks and she’s like, hey, anything you can do to help the president promote his agenda, we sure would help it.

What do you call all of this? It’s propaganda. They got it. OK?

The White House has declared war on this network. The president is now, saying, by the way, read The Huffington Post.

And don’t forget, what was the first question this president took in a press conference? Does anybody here remember? Who did he take his first question from, at the first press conference? The Huffington Post. They’re working hand in hand now, almost like associates.

Hey, where have I heard that before? Oh, yes, Mr. Creel. Mr. Creel, when he said, “With the nation in arms, the need was not so much to keep the press from doing the hurtful things as to get them to do the helpful things. It was not servants we wanted, but associates we wanted.”

It’s amazing. War — war and economy and war and economy. We’ll finish when we come back.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BECK: We’re running out of time so I have to take this real quick and I don’t have time to recap. You’re going to have to watch it on DVR.

Wilson, he read private telegrams to get them. FDR, fishing expedition with broad subpoenas to get them. Here, the DOJ is now in court arguing that you have no reasonable expectation the privacy and they can read your e-mails and no reasonable expectation to privacy of location.

Wilson spied on Americans and pitted neighbor against neighbor. Weak on FDR, but here it is — do you remember when they said if you spot something your neighbor is doing that is suspicious, and, you know, you just send it to flag@WhiteHouse.gov and people went nuts? Remember that?

Also, Cass Sunstein has said infiltrate groups, infiltrate extremists and conspiracy theories. And discredit them. They’re doing the same thing. This man has been compared to FDR, but I’m telling you, America, this man is this man. Check it out!

Related:

• White House In a Snit About Health Care Opposition – Asking For Government Snitches
• Video: Robert Gibbs Fishy Response to White House Request for Fishy Emails
• Anita Dunn: “FOX News wing of the Republican Party”
• Glenn Beck: The White House War on FOX News [Update: Left-leaning Nation magazine “whiner-in-chief”
• The Sly Fox vs. The Rabid Obama Hounds – A Sequel
• Sickened by Keith Olberman? Blame it on FOX
• Dude! Team Obama’s ‘Organizing For America’ Admits They Are Scared of Sarah Palin
• With their panties still in a twist the DNC continues to flog a dead horse —the Rush Limbaugh drama.
• Uncovered Audio: Obama’s Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein’s Creepy Plan for Legally Controlling the Internet
• Oh how I love the smell of progressive desperation in the morning…
• Peeing Their Pants in Fear of Fox News Media Matters Debuts a New Video “Rise Of The Conservative Media”
• [Video] In 2005 Obama FCC Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd Defends Known Communist Paul Robeson [Update: Llyod's Backdoor Fairness Doctrine]
• DHS Rightwing Extremism Report 04-07-09