Fox News’ Sean Hannity: Radical Muslims On The March’ [FULL VIDEO]

June 25, 2014 at 9:50 am

 

islam misunderstood TROP

Click image for a running list of islamic jihad attacks at The Religion Of Peace.com

(Steven Laboe – Right Sightings) –Sean Hannity studio audience Special featuring Brigitte Gabriel, Pamela Geller, Jamie Glazov, KT McFarland, and Todd Starnes as they address the extremely controversial issue of the affect radical Muslims are having upon the rest of the world.

‘Hannity’ Investigation: Radical Muslims on the March –  June 20, 2014

EXPLOSIVE 32 minutes into the video things get really heated.

YouTube Preview Image
(Partial transcript)

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: And welcome to “Hannity.” Tonight, we are investigating the dangerous trend of radical Muslims on the march around the globe. For the entire hour, we’re going to be joined by Middle East and military experts, as well as pundits from both sides of the aisle.

Now, before we bring them in, here are a few disturbing examples of what we are talking about. Take a look.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIPS)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE REPORTER, JUNE 17: Iraq’s biggest oil refinery has been shut down over security concerns, as Islamic militants continue to capture new territory. The extremists have also posted more videos on line showing gruesome acts of violence.

HANNITY, MAY 8: The U.S., the U.K. and France are all joining the effort to search for the nearly 300 girls who were kidnapped from a Nigerian school by the Islamic terror group Boko Haram. Now, this comes after the leader of that organization threatened to sell the girls into slavery. In addition to the kidnapping, the same extremists attacked a northeastern Nigerian town yesterday, leaving at least 100 dead. Fifty bodies have been recovered thus far.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE REPORTER, JUNE 16: At the Breeze View Hotel in Mpeketoni, where football fans had gathered to cheer on the World Cup Sunday night, eyewitnesses told us about 50 men walked in and opened fire. They didn’t stop there. This small coastal town was under assault for hours, homes and hotels torched, people shot and hacked to death.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE REPORTER, SEPT. 23, 2013: Kenyan officials call the attack an act of terrorism, the al Qaeda-linked extremist group al Shabaab reportedly claiming responsibility. Witnesses say the terrorists were on a mission to kill non-Muslims, ordering shoppers to speak Arabic or recite a verse from the Quran in order to save their lives.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE, FEB. 11: According to the Communion of Churches in Indonesia, at least 430 churches have been attacked, closed down or burnt down since 2004.

On the 27th of January, 2013, his church was attacked again, and he was beaten. Two days later, Pastor Bernhard, not his attackers, was sentenced to three months in prison for running an unregistered church.

GREG PALKOT, FOX NEWS REPORTER, MAY 22, 2013: It was, in fact, a brutal terror attack in London, in daylight.

Eyewitnesses say the victim was attacked (sic) to death by the attackers using knives and a hatchet, and then while the victim was left lying on the street, as you noted, Neil, that one of the attackers pronounced Islamist political slogans, including, it is said, “Allah akbar.” (sic)

(END VIDEO CLIPS)

HANNITY: All right, and we bring in our studio audience for reaction tonight. Hi. Welcome, everybody. Good to see you.

Everybody see the video of ISIS slaughtering, even in front of children, in the name of religion. We saw that, right? We see ISIS on the march. We see what’s happening in Iraq. We’ve all witnessed now the rise of radicalism in Iraq.

How many of you saw in Kenya the 48 bodies stacked on top of each other? All see that video? OK. How many of you saw what happened? And we’re now told the former Nigerian president said that it’s unlikely we’ll get those girls back, those school girls. Everybody aware of that? All in the name of radical Islam, right?

Then we’ve got in Afghanistan, what, 11 men, fingers chopped off.  They dared to vote in the general election. That just happened recently.  Indonesia, you heard about the report, 430 churches burned.

Let me — let me start with Carl Higbie and Jonathan Gilliam, both of you former Navy SEALs. Both of you have fought on the ground. Are we seeing the rise of radical Islam in a way that’s worse than what we saw after 9/11 and what led up to 9/11?

CARL HIGBIE, FORMER NAVY SEAL: Absolutely. What happened in 9/11 was a build-up of a long time, but now we’ve gone into those countries, we’ve made even more people angry by fighting the war on their terms, and you know, wishy-washy policies between two presidencies. I think we’re going to see an even steeper rise in violence because of it.

JONATHAN GILLIAM, UNITED STATES CONTINUED SERVICE FOUNDER CEO: I think — we call it radical. The reality is, we should start calling it for what it is. It’s not necessarily terrorism. It’s not necessarily radical. It is a global movement called the caliphate. And what you see when we go over and we fight these little skirmishes and we occupy bases and leave, we create a vacuum, and we basically do the dirty work for these really, really bad people, who want to go and change the way, the face of the globe.

HANNITY: That’s what — that’s what — it’s interesting. General Petraeus said this week about, you know, we can’t become the air force for one side over the other in the Shia-Sunni battle that’s been ongoing for…

GILLIAM: But where we’ve created the vacuum, we now have to go back in and SEAL that vacuum.

HANNITY: Mike Ghouse, welcome. I’m glad you’re feeling better. You weren’t feeling well for a while. Welcome back to the debate. It’s good to have you. You like to always say when you’re on the program you are a moderate Muslim.

MIKE GHOUSE, AMERICA TOGETHER FOUNDATION: Yes, I am.

[Mike Grouse refuses to denounce and goes as far to defend the Islamic society of North America- (ISNA) an extremist radical islamic organization; “ISNA is a good clean organization, making him a radical muslim cultural jihadist in  moderate muslim clothing. ]

HANNITY: Have the voices of the Islamic community — are they loud enough to take on the radicalism that’s hijacking their religion?

GHOUSE: Well, they’re not loud enough. We need to gather momentum.  Shows like yours have given voices to modern Muslims like me, and it is good. And we need to gather up momentum, get more Muslims to start speaking, to let those radicals know that they are — we don’t care about them. There are very few, and there is no encouragement for them, and they shouldn’t do what they are doing.

HANNITY: But your voice to me is unique. I don’t think — Judith Miller, you’re shaking your head no.

JUDITH MILLER, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: (INAUDIBLE)

HANNITY: You hear a lot of moderate Muslim voices speaking out against radicalism and terrorism and the hijacking of religion? Because the world I live in, I see a lot of people that are afraid they’re going to be labeled an apostate, which means that they would be subject to death, right, under Islam?

MILLER: I think that is the problem. It is the fear that so many Muslims who are moderate, who do agree with what you’re saying and what Brigitte’s saying and what others are saying, the fear they have of speaking out, of the reaction of their own community. Until we get and win that battle inside — and only they can win it — we’re going to go on creating the impression that the Islamists, the jihadists are the majority, and they are not.

HANNITY: That right, Brigitte?

BRIGITTE GABRIEL, ACT FOR AMERICA: Not necessarily because if the majority are peaceful-loving Muslims, then what do they have to worry about in their own community? Look at the Muslims in the United States. If there was ever a group of people who are protected under our Constitution to speak freely and be protected — and supposedly, the majority of them are moderate — how come they are not bonding together, and if any radical hurt any of them when they speak up in defense of the United States, the radicals should be…

HANNITY: So you’re saying Mike is an anomaly.

GABRIEL: … squashed (ph), not the moderates!

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: Mike Ghouse, you’ve debated him many times on my show. Is he an anomaly?

GABRIEL: Mike — there are people like Mike, but where are the funders of people like Mike? Where is the funding? You’re going to tell me there’s not one mega-millionaire from Saudi Arabia or the Islamic world that can give Mike $5 million and say, You know what? I believe in your moderate message. I want to help you build a grass roots organization…

HANNITY: Where does CAIR get its funding?

GABRIEL: Exactly! CAIR get its funding from the Middle East!

GHOUSE: Well, CAIR is not getting — I think they used to get the funding from the Middle East, but they’re not. But the moderate Muslims are gaining momentum. There are more and more people — I’m in the community, Muslim community. There is a lot of support for what I am doing. There are many…

HANNITY: Does the Muslim community support me? Because I’ve been very outspoken against radicalism and Sharia and the treatment of women under Sharia. Are they — when you talk to people, they love the show.

GHOUSE: Absolutely. Absolutely. Those Muslims, there are many. I have (INAUDIBLE) and I told them very clearly what you said earlier, that you distinguish between radical Muslims and Muslims and Islam.

HANNITY: But I’m afraid that the more moderate Muslims are afraid to speak out, and I think the numbers of — that have been radicalized are far greater numbers than we see, which is why we’re watching. They’re holding (ph) — we’re doing this special because this, to me — you know, when you see people laid out, as we saw this week, and slaughtered, cold blood murder, or the people, you know, that we saw, the 48 people in Kenya that were slaughtered in cold blood because they didn’t give the right answer, that, to me, is the equivalent of a modern day Nazi!

Pam Geller.

PAM GELLER, ATLASSHRUGS: Well, I think that Mr. Ghouse lives in his own private Islam. He doesn’t have a theological leg to stand on. We saw not just in Kenya, but we saw in the Westgate Mall and we saw in Iraq that the jihadists were separating who they would slaughter and who they wouldn’t. They were separating the Muslims from the non-Muslims.

Long-time readers of my Web site, Atlasshrugs, are not surprised by these developments. This was expected. Obama has been aiding a jihadist agenda, came out yesterday under a Freedom of Information Act, the close ties that Obama had with Libya, Muslim Brotherhood, who were involved in the attack on our embassy. That’s the real smoking gun, that Christopher Stevens had met with the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood in July, the same people that were involved in the Benghazi murder.

The idea that there are moderates — there are moderate Muslims that secretly agree. According to so many worldwide and national polls, there are many that support jihad.

HANNITY: Let me bring up a political question, and I’ll throw it to my good friend, Tamara Holder. Hi, Tamara.

TAMARA HOLDER, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: Hi, Sean.

HANNITY: Because under this president, it seems very clear. He recently this week let out radicals in Afghani prisons. We know that he — we had the Bergdahl swap, for example, five of the most hardened criminals, terrorists, detainees.

Why would the president do this? Why would the president sit back, pull out of Iraq, and city after city, where so many Americans shed their blood for — to help save Iraq and turn Iraq around into an ally of the United States — one by one, those cities are falling.

HOLDER: Right. The reason why the president did that was because we had an American soldier who was held captive, and he made an exchange, which, of course, you would never agree with because nothing the president does, you would agree with.

HANNITY: Not true.

HOLDER: But you, ma’am, I think are the most dangerous person in society… (9:43 mark)

HANNITY: Which ma’am?

HOLDER: With the Heritage Foundation.

HANNITY: No, she’s not — Brigitte — she’s with Act for America.

HOLDER: With Act. Act. I’m sorry.

(CROSSTALK)

HOLDER: With Act. I think that you are the most dangerous person because to say things like moderate Muslims supposedly are not terrorists, or supposedly are not dangerous — the majority of Muslims in this country and in this world are safe, loving people who want peace and who want to protect those — those Nigerian girls were Muslim, by the way, as well. It wasn’t just Boko Haram. (What? Nonsense.)

(CROSSTALK)

HOLDER: … those Nigerian girls.

(CROSSTALK)

CHERI JACOBUS, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: We’re not hearing from the moderates. Regular Americans, laypeople think that they have a negative opinion of the Muslim people because we are only hearing about the murderers. We’re only hearing about the terrorists. We don’t hear from the moderates because they’re afraid to speak out. So you — to jump on…

(CROSSTALK)

JACOBUS: To jump on –

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: One at a time. Let Brigitte respond because you attacked her.

GABRIEL: The difference between me and you is I am fluent in the Arabic language, and I walk into the mosques in this country and I understand what they say. I walk into Arabic grocery stores in this country, in New Jersey, in New York…

HOLDER: I was just in Morocco for two weeks

HOLDER: … two weeks, ma’am!

GABRIEL: I am…

(CROSSTALK)

HOLDER: I spent a lot of time in a Muslim country. So don’t tell me that I don’t understand!

BqsuvtcCQAAwP8i

GABRIEL: My mother tongue is Arabic! I know what they’re saying!  I know how the society operates!

HOLDER: So are you saying that the majority of Muslims are terrorists?

GABRIEL: I’m not saying that the majority of Muslims…

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: Let her answer!

GABRIEL: I’m not saying the majority of Muslims are terrorists. And I did not say that! There are moderate Muslims. The terrorists are only 15 to 25 percent.

GHOUSE: Less than that.

GABRIEL: No, it’s not less than that.

(CROSSTALK)

GABRIEL: The world events shows you the facts. The facts speak louder than words!


Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No. Sean? Sean?…

(CROSSTALK)

GABRIEL: There are 75 percent moderate Muslims in the world. The moderate Muslims…

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: Is she a danger by calling out radicalism, or is it the people that would strap bomb on their own children by the name of jihad and holy war…

(CROSSTALK)

HOLDER: Don’t twist my words, Sean!

HANNITY: Excuse me! And the promise of 72 virgins! Who’s more dangerous?

(CROSSTALK)

GABRIEL: You twisted my words!

HOLDER: Radical Islamists are very dangerous. They are just as dangerous as a person who spews hate and tries to change a message…

(CROSSTALK)

HOLDER: … the majority of moderate Muslims are somehow…

HANNITY: All right, let me — let me…

HOLDER: … terrorists.

(CROSSTALK)

GABRIEL: I didn’t say the majority of Muslim moderates were!

BOOM! Jamie Glazov NAILS islamophiles; the useful idiots of islam –to the WALL!

JAMIE GLAZOV, EDITOR, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM: You know what’s so dangerous about this? You’re a very dangerous person because these are heroes standing up for the victims of Islam! And let me tell you, I study how sociopaths behave, how psychopaths behave. We see this in the unholy alliance right now with the left and Islam.

What they do is when the — a vicious ideology, totalitarian ideology, attacks us and we’re victims, what — what — what the — what these people do is they make the perpetrator the victim and the victim the perpetrator!

So heroes like Pamela Geller that made a memorial grove for Axa Parvis (ph), a 16-year-old Muslim girl — she stood up for the memory of a murdered honor killing victim and made a memorial grove for her in Jerusalem Park. And thank you that you did that, Pamela. And she’s called an Islamophobe! She’s called a hater!

So what’s happening here is these are the heroes standing up for the victims of Islam, but what we have is an unholy alliance between the left and Islam, and they’re making the heroes the perpetrators.

HOLDER: No, no, no, no!

HANNITY: Guys…

GLAZOV: And you’re dangerous…

HOLDER: You’re wrong.

GLAZOV: You’re dangerous by shutting us up about talking the evil that we face!

HANNITY: We’ve got to…

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: We’ve got to take a break.

Islamophobe (is-slahm-o-fohb) – A non-Muslim who knows too much about Islam

VIDEO: Scheduled Speaker Saba Ahmed Blames Benghazi Jihad Victim Chris Stevens Death On U.S. At Occupy Portland Rally (2012)

June 21, 2014 at 5:44 pm

“As a peaceful American Muslim, I’d like to think I’m not that irrelevant.  I”m deeply saddened about the lives that were lost in Libya and I hope we will find justice for their families.
Saba Ahmed at the Heritage Foundation Benghazi Accountability Coalition (June 16, 2014)

So saddened that she refuses to lay the blame at the feet of the guilty party; her co-quranists.

So ‘moderate’! So ‘peaceful’!

Moving along…’peaceful ‘moderate’ muslim Saba Ahmed marches front and center (helping to carry the banner!) with Occupy Portland anti-war rally participants (2012).

saba ahmed marching with occupy portland anti war rally

Then as a scheduled speaker she later addressed the crowd.

Occupy Portland, Not Afghanistan–
Teach-in Sunday October 7, 2012
OPENING PANEL
SABA AHMED serves as the Co-Chair for Interfaith Council of Greater Portland is a member of Islamic Society of Greater Portland (ISGP). Saba has been lobbying against the wars in Washington DC for the last few years at the Senate and House Armed Services, Foreign Relations and Homeland Security Committees. She serves on various Afghanistan Policy workgroups and think-tanks. Saba holds her Juris Doctorate, MBA and Electrical Engineering degrees. While she strongly opposes all wars, she looks forward to keeping deployed troops safe through Islamic culture and sensitivity Trainings.

Watch:

YouTube Preview Image

Starting at the 2:26 mark:

“US foreign policies and warfare upon the Middle East and the muslim world have been very much not appreciated by the muslim world  — (sarcastically murmuring under her breath) to say the least.”

Starting at the 3:02 mark.

“We hope to appoint American muslim diplomats in islamic countries. The recent assassination of the Libyan ambassador (Christopher Stevens) was a strong call for us to look at our foreign policies and engage muslim Americans to help with our diplomat missions (unintelligible).”

UPDATE: One would be foolish to buy Ahmed’s tripe that she is a republican. See my update here.

Also this comment by YouTube user Randy Probasco on the video’s page sums her up quite well IMO:

Democratic congressional candidate, joins republican party after loosing the [Democrat -VH] primary, anti Tea party, pro occupy, this lady is nothing more that a muslim extremist attempting to gain power by any means possible.

Previously:

Court: Christian Police Captain’s Punishment For Refusing to Attend Islamic Service Not Violation Of Rights [UPDATED]

May 24, 2014 at 11:32 am

Arab_FiringMosque
A christian (public servant) Captain Paul Fields has been punished for refusing to bow to Islam.  He has been stripped of his command and demoted. That has the rancid stench of [state sanctioned] sharia all over it.

(Christian News Network) — TULSA, Okla. An appeals court has ruled that the rights of an Oklahoma police captain that was punished in 2010 for refusing to attend an Islamic service were not violated.

As previously reported, three years ago, Captain Paul Fields was ordered to attend “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day,” which was hosted by the Islamic Society of Tulsa at a local mosque. The event, held on an Islamic holy day, was to include a tour of the mosque, an Islamic prayer service, lectures on the Islamic faith and meetings with local Muslim leaders.

Because Fields is a Christian, he felt uncomfortable with attending the event, which was not an official police function. He reportedly met with his superiors to express his concerns and outline why he believed that it was unlawful for the Tulsa Police Department to force him to attend.

“This event is not a police ‘call for service,’ which I would readily respond to as required by my oath of office,” Fields wrote in an email. “It is my opinion, and that of my legal counsel, that forcing me to enter a mosque when it is not directly related to a police call for service is a violation of my civil rights.”

“This is not about religion,” said Police Chief Charles Jordan. “[W]e’re not going because they’re Islamic; we’re going because they’re Tulsa citizens.”

Bullshit. Pure islamophile bullshit.

Attorney Robert Muise of the American Freedom Law Center, which has been representing Fields, has vowed to appeal the decision. He also noted that Fields had informed his superiors that he did not wish to send any subordinates to the event who shared his Christian faith, and stated that he could not attend himself.

“This ruling is troubling on so many levels,” he wrote in a press release following the ruling. “We have argued throughout this case that Captain Fields was summarily punished for simply raising and asserting a religious objection to the order mandating attendance at the Islamic event, and that such discriminatory treatment violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.”

“Indeed, even a cursory review of our briefing before the district court and in the appellate court makes clear the basis for Captain Fields’ constitutional claims: he was singled out for discriminatory treatment and thus punished because he raised a religious objection to the order,” he added. “That is religious discrimination, pure and simple.”

[UPDATE] Tulsa Police Dept’s statement:

The Tulsa Police Department issued a statement as a result of outrage from supporters of the captain.

“One of the Department’s missions is that of community outreach. To facilitate this effort, the Police Department determined this event was a community outreach opportunity and attendance was appropriate,” it stated. “Contrary to what may have already been reported in scheduling this event, the Police Department and the Islamic Society of Tulsa very deliberately arranged attendance so that officers need not participate in any religious discussion or observance that would create any discomfort or inconvenience for them.”

ORLY? Law enforcement Appreciation Day held on a Friday the day muslims hold their prayer services. Would a Catholic church do the same interrupting the sabbath? I think not!

The flyer invite sent to the PD. Note no mention of police work aside from the disingenuous Law Enforcement Appreciation Day label. Which would have been more appropriately titled as; Law Enforcement Da’wah Day.

 

flyerDa’wah (Islamic proselytizing) according to Islam Tomorrow:

The word “Da’wah” in Arabic simply means to invite to something. When it is used in conjunction with Islam it is understood to mean “Inviting to the Way of submission and surrender to Allah.”

Da’wah in Islam is actually an order from Allah in His Holy Qur’an in a number of places. Let us consider one:

    • “Kuntum khairan ummatin ukhrajat linaasi tawmaruna bil maruf wa tan anna anhil munkar.”
      You are the best of people raised up, for you call to all that is right and righteous and you forbid the evil, and you believe in Allah.
      [Qur’an 3:110]

The America Freedom Law Center who are defending Captain Fields explain the chain of events:

On January 25, 2011, Deputy Chief of Police Webster, who is a defendant in this lawsuit, announced in a staff meeting that the Islamic Society was hosting a “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day” that was scheduled for Friday, March 4, 2011. Friday is the “holy day” or “Sabbath” for Islam.

On Wednesday, February 16, 2011, an email approved by City police officials was sent to all police department personnel, stating, “Please see attached flier and rsvp if attending to ensure there is plenty of great food and tour guides.” Attached to the email was a flyer from the Islamic Society.

The event at the Islamic Society was not a collaborative event between the City Police Department and the Islamic Society, but simply an open invitation to “All Tulsa Law Enforcement” that was planned solely by the Islamic Society.

There was no agenda on the invitation flyer—nor was one created by City police offficials—for the invited officers to discuss crime or crime related issues of any kind. Consequently, the Islamic event was not a function of what is known as “Community Policing,” nor did this event involve a “call for service.” In sum, it was a private event hosted by an Islamic religious organization.

The Islamic event involved “Mosque tours,” meeting “Local Muslims & Leadership,” watching the “weekly congregational prayer service,” and receiving presentations on Islamic “beliefs . . . . All questions welcome!” Thus, as advertised, the event involved Islamic proselytizing. See a copy of the flyer here. Consequently, no officer under Captain Fields’ command volunteered to attend.

On February 17, 2011, Captain Fields received an email from his immediate supervisor at the Riverside Division, Major Julie Harris. This email had the subject line, “Tour of Mosque – March 4,” and stated, in relevant part, “We are directed by [Deputy Chief of Police] Webster to have representatives from each shift—2nd, 3rd, and 4th to attend [the Islamic event].” This email also contained the directive from Webster, which was pasted into the text of the email. Webster, with the approval of Chief of Police Jordan, who is also a defendant in this lawsuit, was now ordering officers to attend the Islamic event. It was no longer voluntary.

After receiving the email from Major Harris, Captain Fields met with her to discuss the order from Webster.  He advised Major Harris of his belief that the order was unlawful.  Captain Fields correctly believes that City police officials do not have a right to order police officers to attend an Islamic event against the officers’ personal religious beliefs and convictions.

Captain Fields also responded to the order by email.  In his email response, Captain Fields stated that he believed that the order directing officers to attend the Islamic event was “an unlawful order, as it is in direct conflict with my personal religious convictions, as well as to be conscience shocking.”  Captain Fields concluded his email by stating, “Please consider this email my official notification to the Tulsa Police Department and the City of Tulsa that I intend not to follow this directive, nor require any of my subordinates to do so if they share similar religious convictions.”

On February 18, 2011, Webster sent a three-page interoffice correspondence to Captain Fields by email that affirmed the order and requested Captain Fields to reconsider his position.  Captain Fields again refused based on his religious beliefs, convictions, and conscience.

As a result of Captain Fields’s refusal to compromise his religious beliefs and convictions and violate his conscience, Webster ordered Captain Fields to appear in Jordan’s conference room on Monday, February 21, 2011.

During this meeting with Jordan and Webster, Captain Fields again explained that he believed the order was unlawful and that he could not, in good conscience, obey the order nor force the officers under his charge to obey it.

At the conclusion of this meeting, Captain Fields was served with a pre-prepared order transferring him to the Mingo Valley Division, as well as a notification that the police department was initiating an internal investigation of him for allegedly violating Rule 6 of the Tulsa Police Department Rules and Regulations (“Duty to be Truthful and Obedient”).  The transfer order stated, “This action is taken in reference to an Internal Affairs administrative investigation regarding the refusal to follow a direct order.”

Prior to being transferred for his refusal to violate his personal religious beliefs and those of the officers under his charge, Captain Fields was the shift commander for 26 officers and 5 supervisors.  As a result of this transfer, which is now a permanent part of his personnel record, Captain Fields was stripped of his command and his stellar reputation as a police officer was irreparably tarnished.

On March 10, 2011, Captain Fields received an official notification via email stating, “You are hereby notified that Chief Chuck Jordan has requested IA [Internal Affairs] to conduct an administrative investigation in regards to your refusal to attend and refusal to assign officers from your shift, who shared your religious beliefs, to attend the ‘Law Enforcement Appreciation Day’ on March 4, 2011, at the Tulsa Peace Academy [a.k.a. Islamic Society].

Continued >>>

A few more details on Captain Fields’ punishment:

Just before the invitation to the classes, Captain Fields was one of a group of officers involved in protecting the mosque from threats by a “criminal suspect,” yet he was moved to another department, had his pay suspended for two weeks and denied promotion for one year. He is appealing.

[End update]

Maggie of Maggie’s Notebook on the ‘Islamic Society of North America’ of which The Islamic Society of Tulsa is an affiliate:

Captain Paul Fields of the Tulsa Police was suspended and then transferred for refusing to order his officers to attend an event at the Masjid al-Salam, the Islamic Society of Tulsa (IST). Masjid al-Salam means Mosque of Peace Be Upon You (or something very close). In the IST constitution, on their website, they say they have a “continuous affiliation with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).” The ISNA is an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trials (they collected charitable funds and funneled the money to Hamas and others), as is the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), who owns IST. It is believed the NAIT is funded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Video below.

Here are the questions we need answers to:

Does/did Tulsa Police Chief Chuck Jordan know about Islamic Society of Tulsa’s connections to the ISNA, NAIT, and the Muslim Brotherhood when they suspended and reassigned Captain Paul Fields, and then charged him with having an “anti-Islamic agenda?”…..Do un-indicted co-conspirators of the Holy Land Foundation terrorism funding trials mean nothing to Tulsa law enforcement? Do FBI reports mean nothing? It doesn’t matter whether mosque goers are seen as peaceful members of the community. The Masjid al-Salam Islamic Society of Tulsa has terrorist ties. Z Truth has the story of the anti-Islamic agenda charge against Fields and some good commentary.
……
Captain Paul Fields has not been reinstated since this April meeting the Chief attended. Perhaps Jordan doesn’t understand that Israelis fight terrorism ONLY AGAINST ISLAMISTS. The ISNA and the NAIT are Islamist organizations.  The NAIT owns the Tulsa mosque. The Islamic Society of Tulsa is affiliated with the ISNA. The FBI says the ISNA and the NAIT are connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. This police department is every Islamists dream.

FORCED to attend a day of islamic indoctrination at the Islamic Society of Tulsa’s (IST) mosque. IST is affiliated with the Islamic Society of North America (the head of the Islamic Society snake) who are officially listed as un-indicted co-conspirators of the Holy Land Foundation terror funding trials. Yet Capt. Fields was  stripped of his command when he refused based on his Christian religious beliefs. YET his rights were not violated.

Did ya get all that?

Islamic terror funding (hamas) a-ok

Christian religious freedom  as guaranteed by the United States Constitution -denied

Separation of Church and State: Yes

Separation of mosque and State: No

Emphasis mine.

READ it ALL.

Blazing Cat Fur links…thanks!

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton links at Trevor Loudon’s New Zeal, on her personal blog Noisy Room.net and on Gulag Bound……thanks!

Daniel Greenfield links at FrontPage Mag…thanks!

Post updated: Sunday May 25, 2014

WATCH Stakelbeck on Terror: “Losing Our Sons” to Jihad –The Little Rock Homegrown Jihad Attack

July 24, 2012 at 12:22 pm

Terror expert Erick Stakelbeck of ‘Stakelbeck on Terror’ discusses the documentary “Losing Our Sons” with one of the men behind the film:

YouTube Preview Image

(CBNOnline) On this week’s edition [July 17, 2012] of the Stakelbeck on Terror show, we highlight a new documentary, called “Losing Our Sons,” that examines the deadly impact of radical Islam on two American families and the broader implications for the U.S. Plus, the forces of (CAIR) Islamism are working to silence critics of jihad–and they’ve set their sights on the UN as the place to do it.

Click image to purchase "Losing Our Sons".

Further reading: New Film Exposes Nashville Islamist Network at Family Security Matters

Michele Bachmann Responds To Attacks After Her Call To Investigate Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration Of US Gov’t

July 21, 2012 at 2:13 pm

Transcript of Rep. Michele Bachmann’s recent interview with Glenn Beck:

(Please note that I have embedded various related links within the transcript, that I hope will prove helpful to my readers so that they may better understand the threat we are up against.)

GLENN:  There are a few people in Washington D.C. that I trust and tell the truth.  There are a few people that call me every time they turn on a water faucet from Washington D.C. and they say, “I just want you to know I’m holding a press conference today because I turned on a water faucet.”  You’re like, oh.  And after a while, I don’t take those people’s phone calls and after a while I stop reading their e‑mails.  And there are a few people that are in it for the wrong reasons.  And then there are a few people ‑‑ Jim DeMint is one of them, Michele Bachmann is one of them, Mike Lee is one of them ‑‑ that do it for the right reasons and are clean.  I mean, we were talking about this with Jim DeMint the other day.  Look what Jim DeMint has done.  Jim DeMint just stopped the Law of the Sea Treaty.  I mean, that’s ‑‑ that’s a pretty amazing thing to do.  You can’t take Jim DeMint out because he’s clean.  Does he make mistakes from time to time?  Sure.  Everybody does.  But look at what this guy has done.  Michele Bachmann is the same way.  She’s a good, decent person.  May not agree with her all the time, but she’s a good, decent woman.  And she is standing and she’s on the intelligence committee.  Rarely do I get calls from Michele Bachmann.  But when I do, they’re always important.  And she has called me a few times and lately it’s been about the Muslim Brotherhood because I’ve been ‑‑ I’ve been talking to people in Washington D.C. and saying, “Hey, what’s the deal with the Muslim Brotherhood thing?  Are we looking into this?”  Michele called me this morning and she said, “Glenn, there are decent people up on the Hill that are trying to expose the Muslim Brotherhood and it is spreading.  This disease is spreading so rapidly, it is breathtaking.”  This goes to a documentary that we did about, what, four months ago, three months ago where we exposed what this president is doing with the Muslim Brotherhood and how it is infiltrating all levels.  And we’re at a place now that if we don’t stop it, we’re approaching a point of no return.  And they are purging everything from our military, from our FBI.  So we’re not even teaching what the Muslim Brotherhood stands for.  We’re not teaching what radical Islam even is.  So how are you ever going to find it?  How are you ever going to recognize it?  It’s out of control.

The inspectors general were asked a few questions by a few members of congress.  Michele Bachmann is here to talk about it and this is important.  I beg you to listen because the elephant media and Drudge, Fox, have come out on the wrong side on this issue.  They are following John McCain’s lead.  It’s the wrong lead.  And if you’re not there to back these people up, they’re going to be eaten by CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Michele Bachmann, welcome to the program.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Glenn, thank you so much.  What an important topic, and I have to say that you and the people at The Blaze have been leading the pack on this.  And thank you for the wonderful documentary that you’ve done because the influence today of the Muslim Brotherhood at the highest levels, from the White House, to the Pentagon, to the FBI, even to our United States military truly is breathless and people have to know about it.

GLENN:  Okay.  So tell me what happened.  You and who else wrote a letter to the inspectors general’s office and said, “There are some questions here that need to be addressed.”

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s right.  It was three members of the intelligence committee:  Myself, Lynn Westmoreland from Georgia, Tom Rooney from Florida and two members of the judiciary committee, Trent Franks of Arizona and Louie Gohmert of Texas all signed onto a letter.  We asked numerous questions of the federal government because a letter was sent ‑‑ well, let me just back up.  After the Fort Hood tragedy, a report was issued that said the real problem in our government is that we are not teaching FBI agents or our military to recognize radical Islam.  So that’s what we need to do.  We need to teach about it.

Well, in response to that, 50 ‑‑ over 50 Muslim organizations wrote a letter requesting that the White House start a task force to stop that from happening.  Five days after the White House got this letter, this October 19th letter ‑‑ and people can see it on my website, or maybe you have it on The Blaze ‑‑ five days after the White House got this letter from the 50 Muslim groups, they started the purge of the federal government.  Let me tell you, the federal government doesn’t do anything in five days.  But they started the purge of the FBI.  So now the FBI, who are supposed to be trained in radical Islam, elements have been purged off their training materials so they are no longer being taught about what radical Islam is in order to be able to truly identify it ahead of time.  This is serious.  This is also happening throughout our United States military, Department of Justice, and Homeland Security.  And the word “purge” isn’t my word.  That’s the word used by the 50 Muslim organizations.  They demanded that the president purge the training materials and the trainers.  And so already people have been fired who formerly were teaching what radical Islam is.  They’ve been fired or they’ve been reassigned.  And they ask that the library be purged.  Americans don’t purge libraries, but they demanded that the FBI’s library be purged.  All of this was happening and so we wrote a letter to the inspectors general asking the question:  Don’t you think you should look into the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and what it is they’re seeking to do.

GLENN:  Okay.  So you write this, which is your job.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s our duty.

GLENN:  Your duty to protect and defend the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s right.

GLENN:  There is no question in any sane person’s mind that the Muslim Brotherhood ‑‑ I mean, look at this ‑‑ look at this guy who ran and won the presidency in Egypt.  He says, “Oh, I’m a moderate.  I’m a moderate.”  As soon as he wins, it’s Sharia law, we’re going down, you know, death for Allah is our highest goal.  It’s the all the same crap.  So ‑‑

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  And they call for Jerusalem to become Egypt’s capital, not Israel’s capital.  They call for the demise of Israel and the demise of the United States.  They believe in civilization, jihad, which is to come into the United States and subvert the United States from within.  I know it sounds like radical stuff, but all you have to do is look ‑‑ right, just look at the Muslim Brotherhood and who they say they are.

GLENN:  Okay.  So when you wrote this letter, then Keith Ellison comes out.  And Keith Ellison is ‑‑ he has a record of being the Mafia hitman.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Well, he has a long record of being associated with CAIR and with the Muslim Brotherhood.  CAIR is an unindicted co‑conspirator, as stated in the large terrorist financing case that we’ve had in the United States of America and so he came out and essentially wanted to shut down the inspectors general from even looking into any of the questions that we were asking.  So he wanted to shut it down.

*The Obama Administration Drops CAIR Terror Financing Indictments*

In response I wrote another letter back to Keith Ellison, a 16‑page letter which I would encourage all of your listeners to go and read this letter.  It’s what I call a bulletproof letter.  I have 59 footnotes with one example after another of the penetration of the Muslim Brotherhood into the federal government.  One of the most recent is so outrageous, it’s hard to believe.  Two weeks ago the State Department broke its own law, like I said, and let a foreign terrorist come into the United States, into the White House, meet with the National Security Council ‑‑

GLENN:  Listen to this.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: ‑‑ and demand the release of the blind Sheik.  This is absolutely outrageous.

GLENN:  There’s more to this story that I think is even more outrageous.  Not only did they break their own laws, give this guy a special waiver, bring him into the White House.  This is a guy who is a known ‑‑ part of a known terrorist organization.  He then campaigns to have the blind sheikh released, but who pays for his airline ticket?

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  We do.  The taxpayers.  What I want to know is did we upgrade him to first class.  I mean, this is ‑‑ this is outrageous what has happened.  And so then now what’s happened is the attack machine has been turned on myself and the other members of congress who have been asking the questions, that somehow we’re the Muslim haters, we’re the witch‑hunters, we’re the new Joe McCarthyites because we’re asking these questions.  All the while two weeks ago the Obama administration breaks federal law to bring someone that we list on the State Department as a terrorist organization, a member of that terrorist organization, we bring him into the White House?  You don’t get any higher when it comes to intelligence secrets, you don’t get any higher than the National Security Council.  He sits down with the National Security Council in our White House and has the guts to demand that we release one of the worst, most violent terrorists that we have behind bars.  He wants us to let him out of prison, to let him go free, the guy who was the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the blind sheikh.

GLENN:  So let’s ‑‑

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  And you don’t hear a peep about this.

GLENN:  No, of course not.  Let me ‑‑ let me take you here because one of the more controversial things is you say Anthony Weiner’s wife will is ‑‑ has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.  Now, this is important because she works for Hillary Clinton.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  She is the chief aid for the ‑‑ to the Secretary of State, and we quoted from a document, and this has been well reported all across Arab media, that her father ‑‑ her late father who’s now deceased was a part of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Her brother was a part of the Muslim Brotherhood, and her mother was a part of what’s called the Muslim Sisterhood.  It would be, we have requirements to get a high level security clearance.  One thing that the government looks at are your associations, and in particular your family associations.  And this applies to everyone.  It would be the same that is true with me.  If my family members were associated with Hamas, a terrorist organization, that alone could be sufficient to disqualify me from getting a security clearance.  So all we did is ask, did the federal government look into her family associations before she got a high level security clearance.

GLENN:  And it’s not an unreasonable thing to ask seeing that this president and this administration has ‑‑ didn’t know ‑‑ apparently didn’t know that Van Jones was the founding ‑‑ one of the founding members of a radical revolutionary, anti‑American, Communist organization, and he’s in the White House.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s right.  That’s right, and it’s not ‑‑

GLENN:  So something is ‑‑ somebody’s dropping the ball some place, or somebody knows.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s right.  And somebody has been dropping the ball since the beginning of the Obama administration.  And this isn’t intent to be partisan or out to get the president.  I mean, quite honestly on the intelligence committee I’m happy to report we are the most bipartisan committee I’ve ever been a part of, and with all of these unprecedented leaks that have been coming out from our federal government, all of which, by the way, undermine Israel, and Israel’s ability to defend herself against a nuclear Iran, we are with one voice, Democrat and Republican, outraged by these leaks that are coming out of the administration.  Never before in the history of the country have we seen this level of leaks coming out, but at the same time there’s also a parallel track of influence from the Muslim Brotherhood in the highest levels of the federal government, and we think that we need to get answers to these questions.  And that’s the purpose of our letters.  We’re asking that the inspectors general answer these questions, and Keith Ellison is trying to shut this, these questions down from getting addressed.

GLENN:  I’m really tight on time and I want to hit a couple of other things.  Stu’s got ‑‑ Stu’s been going over all of this information, and he’s got one question for you.

STU:  Well, I see here that you did like, too, the actual military document that talks about what is a potentially disqualifying condition for security clearance.  It says, quote:  Contact with a foreign family member, if that contact creates a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, inducement, manipulation, pressure or coercion.  Then goes on to say the subject’s closest and most frequent contacts are the ones most likely to present a security risk.  And you’re talking about both her father, who’s now deceased, her mother and her brother.  So I think the media seems to be holding you to this standard that you have to have this case completely proven when it seems like what you’re saying is, is there a legitimate process question:  Are they actually asking these questions before handing out these clearances.

GLENN:  Right.  This has been ‑‑ I mean, your links and your footnotes ‑‑ and they’re down, by the way.  I don’t know if you know that, Michele.  But the Al‑Jazeera links that you put in and you said, here, go link ‑‑ go find the story on Al‑Jazeera.  We can’t get to them this morning.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Oh, really?

GLENN:  Oh, yeah.  We’re going to need ‑‑

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Gosh.  Maybe we can go ‑‑ maybe we can go in the past and dig them up so that we can resurrect them.

GLENN:  Yeah, we’re going to have to get them because they’ve either been scrubbed or they’re being hammered, you know, by so much traffic which I highly doubt.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Heavens.

GLENN:  So that’s ‑‑ I mean, you have links showing that in Al‑Jazeera’s own coverage.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Well, these links were up as of last Friday.

GLENN:  Yeah, well, they’re not ‑‑

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  I wrote the letter and we got it out by midnight last Friday night and the links were up last Friday.  So they’ve taken them down.  Gee.

GLENN:  I will tell you that that’s not unusual.  As we’ve followed these stories like this, that’s really not unusual anymore.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s even more reason why we should be looking into this.

GLENN:  Yeah.  Let me just say this to you and then one more quick question.  I just wrote a letter to the president of my company for The Blaze and he’s in charge of all content.  He’s kind of our news, you know, our uber news director, if you will, he’s the president of content.  And I just said we know the truth on this story.  We’ve had this for a while.  I do not want this company to sit down on this.  So we are going to cover this and continue to cover this to make sure that people hear this story because, Michele, you guys are absolutely right and it is a matter of national survival.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s right.

GLENN:  Let me ask you ‑‑

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  National security.

GLENN:  Let me ask you one quick question.  John McCain and all of the elephant media are falling right in line with the Muslim Brotherhood.  Bullcrap.  What did John McCain do yesterday?

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  He went on the Senate floor and he gave a spirited defense of Huma Abedin, who is a friend of his.  And so that’s what he did and I think ‑‑

GLENN:  But you’re not saying that she is compromised?  You’re saying have we looked into this, right?

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  That’s right.  That’s all we’re saying because we did not infer that she is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood or that she’s working on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.

GLENN:  Right.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Our point was regarding the security clearance.

GLENN:  Right.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  And did she have to go through the same sort of process that anyone else has to go to.  Did they check the boxes.  Because if the State Department breaks American law to bring a terrorist into the White House, a member of a terrorist organization, it certainly is conceivable that maybe they looked the other way on issuing the security clearance.  That’s all we’re doing is asking a question.

GLENN:  I have to tell you, we’re at war.  We’re at war with people in the Middle East, and her ‑‑ she’s compromised ‑‑ forget about the Muslim thing.  She’s compromised or could have been compromised.  Her husband was sending dirty photos of himself.  I mean, you know, in a wartime, you would never put that person in a delicate situation because the family has already been compromised.  But I digress.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  Well, and ‑‑

GLENN:  Thank you very much.  Go ahead.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN:  I was just going to say the Muslim Brotherhood elements have declared war against the United States.

GLENN:  All right.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: ‑‑ and Israel.  And we need to recognize that they are at war, even if we don’t fully, are onto this.  And we’ve got to, but I thank you and everyone at The Blaze for taking this on because the media has a completely different view of it.  So thank you.

GLENN:  Well, they’re always ‑‑ they’re almost always wrong, especially when it comes to these things.  Michele, thank you very much and keep up the fight.  Never sit down.  We’ve got your back.

Via sheikyermami at Winds of Jihad who has the video.

Show your support for Michele Bachmann on Twitter by contributing to this trending topic: #IStandWithBachmann And by following her here: @MicheleBachmann

Suggested reading:

Muslim Brotherhood in the USA - Hudson Institute

Domestic Intelligence Briefing Vetting the Muslim Brotherhood front the  Muslim Students Association (MSA) – Educate USA

Image source: ALLEN WEST: “Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic radical groups influencing U.S. policies is resulting in our ‘cultural suicide’” – Bare Naked Islam

FOIA Doc Dump Divulges How Obama’s DOJ Prostrates To The Muslim Brotherhood

January 28, 2012 at 6:53 pm

“The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

In a rational society, these Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups would be marginalized.

Instead, the DOJ is playing Stepin Fetchit for them.

They’re using the DOJ as their legal arm.

Also see:

Video: Rep. Gohmert Asks A Squirming Holder for DOJ Docs Provided to [CAIR] Holy Land Foundation Trial Defendants/Terrorists

Treason –The Obama Administration DOJ Drops CAIR Terror Financing Indictments

MUST WATCH! PJTV Special Report: Islamic Infiltration of U.S. Government: DOD & FBI Whistleblowers Speak [Video]

Image source: AFDI/SIOA Event at CPAC 2012: Islamic Law in America: How the Obama Justice Department Is Selling Us Out

Video: Rep. Gohmert Asks Holder for DOJ Docs Provided to Holy Land Foundation Trial Defendants/Terrorists

December 9, 2011 at 2:26 pm

First, let’s have a look at a detailed list of the convicted Holy Land Foundation trial defendants:
Dallas Morning News – Crime Blog

  • Ghassan Elashi, of Richardson, a Holy Land Foundation founder, received 65 years for support of Hamas, money laundering and tax fraud.
  • Shukri Abu Baker, of Garland, who was Holy Land’s CEO, received 65 years for support of Hamas, money laundering and tax fraud.
  • Mufid Abdulqader, of Richardson, was a top volunteer fundraiser and sang about Hamas in a Palestinian band that played at fundraising rallies, received 20 years for conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization; conspiracy to provide funds, goods and services to a specially designated terrorist; and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
  • Abdulrahman Odeh, who started Holy Land’s office in New Jersey, received 15 years in prison for conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization; conspiracy to provide funds, goods and services to a specially designated terrorist; and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
  • Mohammad El-Mezain, an imam who ran Holy Land’s office in California, received 15 years in prison for providing support to Hamas.

The back story via The Investigative Project on Terrorism:

Today the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the convictions of five former officials of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) accused of illegally routing more than $12 million to the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.

In November 2008, a federal jury convicted the five HLF officials on all counts, including conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. The officials subsequently received long prison terms ranging from 15 to 65 years, concluding the largest terror financing case prosecuted in the United States since the 9/11 attacks.

Evidence presented at the trial showed the HLF was part of a broad Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy in the United States called the Palestine Committee that sought to propagate the goals of Hamas in the U.S. with “media, money, and men.” Prosecution exhibits further detailed the existence of a secret Hamas-support network in the U.S. created by the Muslim Brotherhood. A Brotherhood memorandum from 1991 described the group’s goal in America, calling for a “civilization-jihad process” and a “grand jihad” that aimed at “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within … so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

The 170-page opinion issued by a three-judge panel reiterates that after the creation of Hamas in 1987, the Muslim Brotherhood directed its worldwide chapters to establish “Palestine Committees” to promote Hamas objectives from abroad. The Palestine Committee in the U.S. led by Mousa Abu Marzook, the leader of Hamas’s political wing in the 1990s, created the Holy Land Foundation and the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP). The IAP is the progenitor of the present-day Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a leading Muslim Brotherhood group in the U.S. that was also named an unindicted co-conspirator in the case.

Read it all >>>

Emphasis mine. H/T Donald Douglas at American Power

Now watch Holder the smarmy, weasel respond to Rep. Gohmert’s questions regarding his request for the Holy Land Foundation trial court documents.

YouTube Preview Image
GohmertTX01

In the Judiciary Committee Oversight Hearing, Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) requested the documents the Department of Justice provided to the 5 defendants in the Holy Land Foundation Trial.

Creeping Sharia asks sarcastically, I assume:

CAIR is Hamas, so when will they be put on trial?

Never, as long as Obama is at the helm. =>Treason –The Obama Administration Drops CAIR Terror Financing Indictments [Updated]

MUST WATCH! PJTV Special Report: Islamic Infiltration of U.S. Government: DOD & FBI Whistleblowers Speak [Video]

August 25, 2011 at 9:24 am

The enemy has not breached the gates, the enemy has been given an engraved invitation. Islam’s sensitivities were weighed against our national security and in the end our enemy’s feelings won out.

Bill Whittle Investigates: In Washington, DC radical Islam’s influence over our government is growing and access to our national security secrets is part of a much larger strategy. Two whistleblowers have the chilling details.

The Islamic Infiltration, Part 1: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets
YouTube Preview Image
Link

In part two of Bill Whittle’s investigation of radical Islam’s influence over our government, a former FBI special agent discusses how our government has looked the other way as an Islamic insurrection mounts within our borders.

The Islamic Infiltration, Part 2: From Influence to Insurrection
YouTube Preview Image
Link

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran . . . should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”
Omar Ahmad, CAIR co-founder and longtime Board Chairman (1998)

Also see:

Related Documents:

“The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their **work in America** is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

Trevor Loudon at New Zeal Blog links…thanks!

Obama Has NEVER Released an Easter Message Yet He Has NEVER Forgotten Ramadan [Updated]

August 3, 2011 at 11:27 pm

Apparently the Obama fancies life on his knees…bowing to Mad Bloody Mo and Allah FUBAR. Well he can count me out, he does not speak for me.

YouTube Preview Image

And it is painfully obvious he has zero respect for Christians.

So if you [still] believe Obama is a Christian, consider yourself  to have been “hoodwinked and bamboozled”.

H/T Bare Naked Islam

Logan’s Warning:

Obama, you obviously know a lot about Islam. Which means when you speak of the “tolerance” of Islam you are being deceptive.

Update:

(CNS News) … A review of presidential statements documented at whitehouse.gov indicates that Obama has apparently not issued a statement specifically about Easter since taking office in January 2009.

H/T DMartyr at Jawa

Treason –The Obama Administration Drops CAIR Terror Financing Indictments [Updated]

April 17, 2011 at 5:52 pm

Islamic America hating vultures salivating at the thought of the opportunity to gnaw at the carcass of what was once was the greatest country in the world. Forget prosecuting terror on US soil, Muslim feelings are at stake!

It is a felony offense to know or have reason to know that seditious activity is underway and do nothing about it. The term used in the U.S. Code for such a crime is misprision of treason. — Frank Gaffney

(PJM Exclusive) Did Obama and Holder Scuttle Terror Finance Prosecutions?
High-level source concedes DOJ let off CAIR co-founders and others for political reasons.

Patrick Poole

Red Green Alliance - The Obama Administration and Terrorist Front CAIR

Red Green Alliance Treason- The Obama Administration and Terrorist Front CAIR

…a number of leaders of Islamic organizations (all of whom publicly opposed the King hearings on Muslim radicalization) were about to be indicted on terror finance support charges by the U.S. attorney’s office in Dallas, which had been investigating the case for most of the past decade.But those indictments were scuttled last year at the direction of top-level political appointees within the Department of Justice (DOJ) and possibly even the White House. Included in those indictments was at least one of the co-founders of CAIR, based on Declination of Prosecution of Omar Ahmad, a March 31 DOJ legal memo from Assistant Attorney General David Kris to Acting Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler. A second DOJ official familiar with the investigation independently confirmed these details. Omar Ahmad is one of CAIR’s co-founders and its chairman emeritus. He was personally named, along with CAIR itself, as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror finance trial in 2007 and 2008. During the trial FBI Agent Lara Burns testified that both Omar Ahmad and current CAIR executive director Nihad Awad were caught on FBI wiretaps attending a 1993 meeting of Hamas leaders in Philadelphia.
……
According to my source, the chief reason outlined in the DOJ memo declining to prosecute CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad was the issue of potential jury nullification. The first Holy Land Foundation trial in 2007 ended in a hung jury. When the case was retried in 2008, all five defendants, former executives of the Holy Land Foundation, were convicted on all 108 counts.

But, according to our DOJ source, possible jury nullification was hardly the primary issue in the DOJ’s scuttling of the terror finance prosecutions. This was a political decision from the get-go, the source said.

It was always the plan to initially go after the [Holy Land Foundation] leaders first and then go after the rest of the accomplices in a second round of prosecutions. From a purely legal point of view, the case was solid. Jim Jacks [the U.S. attorney in Dallas who prosecuted the Holy Land Foundation executives] and his team were ready to go. There’s a mountain of evidence against all of these groups that was never introduced during the Holy Land trial and it is damning. We’ve got them on wiretaps. That’s exactly why many of these leaders and groups were named unindicted co-conspirators in the first round of prosecutions.

But from a political perspective there was absolutely no way that they could move forward. That’s why this decision came from the top down. These individuals who were going to be prosecuted are still the administration’s interfaith allies. Not only would these Muslim groups and their friends in the media be screaming Islamophobia at the top of their lungs and that this is a war against Islam, but the administration would look like absolute fools. It’s kind of hard to prosecute someone on material support for terrorism when you have pictures of them getting handed awards from DOJ and FBI leaders for their supposed counter-terror efforts. How would Holder explain that when we’re carting off these prominent Islamic leaders in handcuffs for their role in a terror finance conspiracy we’ve been investigating for years? This is how bad the problem is. Why are we continuing to have anything to do with these groups knowing what we know?

READ IT ALL >>>

I can picture Obama and Holder et all on their knees licking the boots of Nazi’s.

This. Can. Not. Stand.

H/T Rusty Shackleford

Excerpt from Patrick Poole’s piece above:

During the trial FBI Agent Lara Burns testified that both Omar Ahmad and current CAIR executive director Nihad Awad were caught on FBI wiretaps attending a 1993 meeting of Hamas leaders in Philadelphia.

United States District Court Northern District of Texas documents of the CAIR- Hamas Philly meeting FBI wiretapping. Portion of the recorded convo. here: FBI Wiretap CAIR Hamas Meeting Philly 1993 #4 and here FBI Wiretap CAIR Hamas Meeting Philly 1993 #4E, the summary (list of participants) here: FBI Wiretap CAIR Hamas Meeting Summary Philly 1993

If you have time on your hands browse through the entire body of evidence here: USA v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development Exhibit List

Screenshot samples:

09/29/08 Philly 1993 #4E ( pg 3)
Om (Omar Ahmad CAIR founder)

09/29/08 Philly Meeting 5 (page 16)
UM1 (unidentified male)

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” –Cicero

Update:

More from Patrick Poole. RepPeter King is demanding answers.

(UPDATED) DOJ Source: Gov’t Muslim “Outreach” Jeopardized Active Terror Investigations

UPDATE: On the heels of last week’s article by Patrick Poole, Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has sent a letter to Eric Holder this morning demanding answers as to why the Department of Justice decided not to prosecute CAIR, its co-founder Omar Ahmad, and others regarding the Holy Land Foundation case. >>>>

Maggie at Maggie’s Notebook links…thanks!

Related: