**WARNING GRAPHIC**

Note the public hanging of the black flag of jihad in this next video.

Last but not least flesh eating zombie aid recipient. You read that right. Proceed with caution.

H/T Blazing Cat Fur here and here and here.

The Ellesmere Port Catholic High School letter to parents notifying them of the trip to the Al Rahma Mosque in Toxteth, Liverpool

Had it been my child, the conversation would not have progressed as far as to whether she would be wearing a scarf –or not. I would have drawn the line at the mandatory mosque trip. But good on those parents who took a stand.

(Daily Mail) –A Roman Catholic schoolgirl has been labelled a truant after she refused to wear a headscarf during a compulsory trip to a mosque.

Amy Owen, 14, and fellow girl pupils at a Catholic secondary school were told to cover their heads and wear trousers or leggings out of respect for their Muslim hosts.

But when her mother objected, saying she did not want her daughter to ‘dress as a Muslim’, she received a sternly worded warning letter from the headmaster saying she had no choice.
……
He added: ‘There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.

‘The second is that the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion.

‘A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement. None of us would relish that.

‘Whilst I may not require you to pay for this I must require your child to participate.’

Amy’s mother Michelle Davies refused to back down and, after being told no teachers would be back at school to keep an eye on her daughter, she kept her at home, citing religious objections – as did as many as ten other families.

Yesterday, after the school acted on its threat to class Amy’s absence as truancy, Miss Davies accused it of discriminating against Christian pupils.

‘It’s like they’re putting a gun to your head – either you go to a mosque, or you’re marked down as an unauthorised absence on your record – that’s it no two ways about it,’ the 34-year-old said.
……
Parents were asked to make a £3 payment towards the Year 9 trip to the Al Rahma Mosque in Liverpool last month, and an 11-point dress and behaviour code from the mosque was circulated.

Miss Davies, a home help, of Ellesmere Port, added: ‘There are some parts of religious education lessons that children who are Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t have to attend because that’s part of their religion, and the fact is Amy is Catholic and not a Muslim.’

Continued >>>

Read the last paragraph very carefully. Jehovah’s Witness students get a pass at the Catholic school but the Catholic students do not on a forced field trip to a mosque.

Chrislam; once you invite the devil across your doorstep, he…will…never…leave. And if you dare try to push him out, there will be hell to pay.

Abso-freaking-lutely ludicrous. “Shameful” & “unacceptable“.

Washington Free Beacon:

Attorney General Eric Holder used the phrase “I don’t know” or some variation, at least 57 times during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee today as House Republicans grilled him over controversies including the IRS’ targeting of Tea Partiers, the Justice Department’s seizure of journalist phone records, and the security lapses surrounding the Boston bombing.

As the nation’s top law enforcement official, Eric Holder is privy to all kinds of sensitive information. But he seems to be proud of how little he knows.

That was my thought exactly earlier today. Maybe now that Dana Milbank agrees with me it is magically no longer a racist thought.

On and on Holder went: “I don’t know. I don’t know. . . . I would not want to reveal what I know. . . . I don’t know why that didn’t happen. . . . I know nothing, so I’m not in a position really to answer.”

Holder seemed to regard this ignorance as a shield protecting him and the Justice Department from all criticism of the Obama administration’s assault on press freedoms. But his claim that his “recusal” from the case exempted him from all discussion of the matter didn’t fly with Republicans or Democrats on the committee, who justifiably saw his recusal as more of an abdication.

“There doesn’t seem to be any acceptance of responsibility in the Justice Department for things that have gone wrong,” said Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), after Holder placed the AP matter in the lap of his deputy. “We don’t know where the buck stops.”

• Doc Drop: White House Releases 100 Pages Of #Benghazi Emails –Admin. Talking Points
• Eric Holder: “Not Sure” When I Recused Myself on Secret AP Subpoena, Not In Writing
• Photo: Obama’s DOJ AG Eric Holder Being SWORN IN Prior To Testifying On IRS & AP Scandals
• Obama Believes In An “Unfettered Press”? What About His War Against @FoxNews??
• @TheDailyShow’s Jon Stewart Excoriates Obama Over #IRS & #DOJ @AP Scandals [Update: Stewart Doubles Down! You Can’t Keep Saying You Found Out About News At the Same Time As Us!]
• @ABC Analyst Trey Hardin: Very Likely West Wing Of White House Authorized #IRS-Gate Targeting Conservative Groups [Audio]
• CNN: Decision To Scrub Terror Reference From #Benghazi Talking Points Made At White House Meeting

WASHINGTON –  State Department officials repeatedly objected to — and tried to water down — references to Al Qaeda and prior security warnings in the administration’s initial internal story-line on the Benghazi attack, according to dozens of emails and notes released by the White House late Wednesday.

The documents also showed the White House, along with several other departments, played a role in editing the so-called “talking points,” despite claims from the White House that it was barely involved. And they showed then-CIA Director David Petraeus objected to the watered-down version that would ultimately be used as the basis for U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s flawed comments on several TV shows the Sunday after the attack. 
……
One email sent the night of the Friday after the attack from an unknown official said: “The State Department had major reservations with much or most of the document.” Individual emails leading up to that assessment show State officials repeatedly objecting to the intelligence community’s early version of events.  The early versions stated that “Islamic extremists with ties to Al Qaeda” participated in the assault and discussed links to militant group Ansar al Sharia — and referenced prior attacks against western targets in Benghazi.
……
In response to her concerns, Assistant Secretary of State David S. Adams voiced agreement. He said the line about prior incidents “will read to members like we had been repeatedly warned.” ……
The documents describe how the administration developed “talking points” to describe what the administration wanted to discuss publicly immediately after the Sept. 11, 2012, attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. [...]

White House Benghazi Emails May 15, 2013 Early Versions Stated “Islamic extremists with ties to Al Qaeda”

Refreshing selective memories:

First ABC, and now CNN…flying pigs …OH MY!

“An email dated September 14 at 7:39PM, State Department Spokeswoman Victora Nuland wrote “Why do we want the Hill fingering Ansar al-Sharia when we aren’t doing that ourselves? And the penultimate point could be abused to beat the State Department for not paying attention to agency warnings.” At that point the emails indicate the references to Ansar al Sharia were removed.”

“But Nuland chimed in again “These don’t resolve all of my issues or those of my building’s leadership. they are consulting with NSS (National Security Council Staff).”

“One minute later Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff emails “ We’ll work this through in the morning. Get comments back.”

“Then Ben Rhodes, a top national security official warns the talking points shouldn’t jeopardize the investigation and tables the discussion for a White House meeting the next day, when it appears the decision was made to drop the reference to the terror group.”

When the levee breaks…
[You're] going down… going down now… going dowwwwn….
Hit it boys!

Inspiration @NotASheep

Hey @presssec Carney, Hillary Clinton, & Obama….this song’s for you! #Benghazi youtube.com/watch?v=fOEQTJ… #WhenTheLeveeBreaks

— Notta Sheep (@NottaSheep) May 10, 2013

Previously:
Emails Reveal Obama State Dept.’s Deceitful,Treacherous, Sinister Selective Editing Of #Benghazi Talking Points

ABC Exclusive: Obama Admin Revised #Benghazi Talking Points 12 Times! Terror Reference, CIA Terror Warnings Scrubbed At Request of State Dept.

This video was posted on youtube the day after the Benghazi attack.
Via Sooper Mexican:

MEXCLUSIVE SCOOP!

While Republicans try to get to the truth behind the ridiculous reaction the Obama administration had to the Benghazi attacks, and Democrats do their best to protect Obama from attacks, this video should remind us of why this issue is so important:

Dana is ‘pissed off’ and is not taking it any more.

Previously:

• Obama Admin Revised #Benghazi Talking Points 12 Times! Terror Reference, CIA Terror Warnings Scrubbed At Request of State Dept.
• #Benghazi Victims Mother: “Hillary & Susan Rice Both Told Me Personally Nose To Nose It Was The ‘Video’”
• Darrell Issa ‘On The Record’ With Greta: Key Takeaways From #Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing
• Full Video: “Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing: “Exposing Failure and Recognizing Courage”
• During #Benghazi Hearing Susan Rice Tweet Brags About Receiving ‘Great American’ Award
• Video: Mother Of #Benghazi Victim Sean Smith To Jake Tapper: “I Blame [Hillary Clinton]“
• Names of #Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing Witness’ Revealed
• Emails Reveal Obama State Dept.’s Deceitful,Treacherous, Sinister Selective Editing Of #Benghazi Talking Points
• MUST WATCH: Bret Baier’s Special Report on #Benghazi Whistleblowers
• FBI Photos Of Individuals Sought For Information Regarding Benghazi Jihad Attacks

Deceptive traitorous power hungry bastards…

ABC’s Johnathan Karl has the exclusive scoop:

When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story.

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

Related: Read the Full Benghazi Talking Point Revisions

White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.
……
State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland raised specific objections to this paragraph drafted by the CIA in its earlier versions of the talking points:

“The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya.  These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks.”

In an email to officials at the White House and the intelligence agencies, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland took issue with including that information because it “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either?  Concerned …”

The paragraph was entirely deleted.

Continued >>>