(Telegraph) –The offices of French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo have been destroyed by a petrol bomb, a day after it named the Prophet Mohammed as its “editor-in-chief” for this week’s issue.
The fiercely anti-clerical magazine said the move, which included renaming the publication “Sharia Hebdo”, was intended to “celebrate” the victory of Islamist party Ennhada in Tunisia’s election.
Charlie Hedbo’s editor-in-chief, known as Charb, told France Info radio: “We no longer have a newspaper. All our equipment has been destroyed or has melted.”
No injuries have been reported
A single Molotov cocktail was thrown at the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris’s 20th arrondissement at around 1am. The ensuing fire was rapidly put out, but a large amount of material in the office was destroyed, police said.
“We cannot, today, put together a paper,” said Charb. “But we will do everything possible to do one next week. Whatever happens, we’ll do it. There is no question of giving in,” he said,
Refusing to bow to Allah FUBAR. How refreshing! A publication with a –spine!
Charlie Hebdo’s website has also been hacked with a message in English and Turkish cursing the magazine.
The message said: “You keep abusing Islam’s almighty Prophet with disgusting and disgraceful cartoons using excuses of freedom of speech.
“Be God’s curse upon you!”
Attacking ‘freedom of speech’ is disgusting and disgraceful. But that is how Islam rolls…
The cover of this week’s issue, out on Wednesday, shows Mohammed saying: “100 lashes if you don’t die of laughter”.
It also includes an editorial by the Prophet entitled Halal Aperitif and a women’s supplement called Madam Sharia.
Mohammed Moussaoui, president of the French Council for the Muslim Faith (CFCM), said he “firmly condemned” the arson attack if it proved criminal.
If it proved criminal??? That is the only option, you heathen jackass. It wasn’t a love note.
The CFCM lost a court case against Charlie Hebdo in 2006 for re-printing Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed but denounced “the apology of violent Muslims”.
So violent jihad is unseemly, but legal jihad is a-ok. Gotcha…
He said this issue was “not on the same level” of provocation, but added: “The very fact of caricaturing the Prophet is considered an offense to Muslims“.
KEY WORD: Muslims. NOT anyone else — JUST Muslims.
French publication Le Figaro has published the Charlie Hebdo MO cover –Good on them!
On last page, “the covers to which you have escaped”, a drawing represents Mahomet with a red nose of clown and this sentence: “Yes, Islam is compatible with humour”.
I couldn’t find the original Charlie Hebdo image of Mo with a red clown nose, so this one will have to do.
Mock, mock who’s there? Arrogant, thin skinned, Islamic jihad inclined Muslims, that’s who.
(Business Insider) –The website of French satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo has been taken offline after its host received death threats from Islamic groups angry at the publication’s proposal for a special Islamic issue.
France 24reports that Belgian hosting company, Bluevision, has taken the site down after being threatened.
According to the BBC, Charlie Hebdo’s editor has called the firebombing of the magazine’s offices as “an attack against freedom. [...]
Islam ‘rage boy’ image via Snarky Basterd at Feed Your ADHD.
Mo red clown nose image via KingShamus.
It is not necessary for a Muslim to wield an AK-47 or wear strap on bombs to be a viable threat.
Via Acharya S. and D.M. Murdock at Islam Watch
Allah sent the Quran for all mankind…The Quran is that last update for all people down to the last one. And the Quran abrogates all previous books , cancels all previous books …Allah commanded the Christians and Jews in the Quran to follow the Quran and to believe in the prophet Muhammad.
Like hell. No pun intended.
In Germany Islam is given free reign to insult Christianity and Judaism in the classroom, but don’t dare speak out against Islam or…
Thilo Sarrazin’s new anti-immigration/anti-Muslim book continues to make waves in Germany. The Bundesbank wants to fire him and his party, the Social Democrats, wants to expel him. Both will face legal challenges.
Read the entire book online. The following text is author Sujit Das’ forward.
A Note to the Readers
Islam stands or falls on the credibility of Muhammad on which we do not have single evidence but unfathomable doubts because his conduct was immoral. But he successfully twisted the sense of morality of his followers, distorted their sense of ‘Humanness’ and linked “doing good” and “a service to God” to all ungodly things. Briefly, he had given a sacred aura to crime and terrorism.
Was Muhammad truthful and sincere when he claimed to the title of prophet? Or, was he a vulgar imposter, who posed as a prophet with his eyes upon a throne from the beginning? Where we can find some concrete evidence that Qur’anic revelations were not Muhammad’s delusions or his conscious fabrications?
Where is the ‘divine’ verification for ‘divine’ revelations? If we put the Qur’an in chronological order and correlate it with the context of Muhammad’s life as was reported in Sira, Sunnah and Hadith we find Allah mirrored Muhammad’s character. Allah was too dumb to be God and too immoral to be Divine.
In this treatise I have no intention to test God. I just want to test Muhammad’s claim to the
title of messenger of God because I cannot blindly accept his claim. Throughout the
recorded history of Mankind, many imposters had posed as God-man and fooled us.
Muhammad may be a true prophet or he may be an imposter. We must test him to see
which he is. Anyone who claims to be a prophet must be prepared to have his prophecy
This treatise is a critical investigation, where I have probed deep into the strange imaginary
fantasy world of Muhammad not only in search of an answer but also to unfold many mysteries
of Islam and Muslims. First, I had looked at Muhammad through the spectacle of blind faith and
then through the spectacle of science, logic and modern development of Psychological and
Mental Disorder studies. This document contains the findings of my investigation.
When an investigation is done in any intellectual field, no investigator can claim that his
academic research work is complete in every respect and the conclusions are final. It is always
like an open loop and there is constantly a scope for further research. I sincerely hope that the
enthusiastic readers (both Muslim and non-Muslim) with further investigation will come out with more interesting facts on different aspects of the same topic.
This document is heavy reading, and lengthy. I ask for reader’s patience on this.
Sujit Das (e-mail: counter.jihad (at) yahoo.co.uk)
This book is under no copyright Law. You may translate, publish and distribute this book by any means and without any legal restriction or prior permission, but at least let me know by sending me a mail counter.jihad (at) yahoo.co.uk
Bio: So far I have written fourteen articles which had been published in various websites, as example, FFI, Islam-Watch, Islam-monitor, Mukto-mona, Allied apostates of Islam, Vinnomot. Some of my articles are well appreciated by readers and translated to other languages on the Internet.
Connect with Sijit Das on Facebook.
In closing, a newly unveiled Bosch Fawstin treat. Just in case you have ever wondered and you know you have – What Does Mohammad Look Like Unmasked?
“Telling the truth after proper investigation is the height of courage.” – Wafa Sultan
[...] This mantra, “Islam is a religion of peace,” is repeated so often that it has become an indisputable statement of fact in the minds of many.
Even a cursory examination of Islam’s history and Islamic texts conclusively proves the exact opposite. Islam was, and continues to be, a movement of unbridled violence.
The pundits, the analysts and the politicians are doing a great disservice to the public, each segment for its own expedient reasons, by parroting the mantra regarding the peaceful nature of Islam. As a matter of fact, the so-called small band of Islamic extremists is the true face of Islam. …
The liberal media and pundits engage in willful misinformation and deception when it suits them. Terms such as “Political Islam,” or “Radical Islam,” for instance, are contributions of this group. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam, simply because they are redundant.Â Islam, by its very nature and according to its charter—the Quran—is a radical political movement.Â It is the liberal media and politicians who sanitize Islam and misguide the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion and that this main body is non-political and moderate.
Regrettably, a large segment of the population goes along with these nonsensical euphemisms depicting Islam because it prefers to believe them. It is less threatening to believe that only a hijacked small segment of Islam is radical or politically driven and that the main body of Islam is indeed moderate and non-political.
We must recognize that Islam is political to the core. In Islam, the mosque and State are one and the same—the mosque is the State. …
While I salute Congressman Peter King for having the courage to discuss the issue of Islamic radicalization in the U.S, I warn my fellow Americans: Remain a spectator at your own peril!
It is imperative that you take a stand and do your part in pointing out that Islam is the culprit and do all you can to prevent the Islamic fire from devouring our civilized way of life and our republic.
Read Amil Imani’s article in it’s entirety >>>
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and a pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. Imani is a columnist, literary translator, novelist and essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. He maintains a website at www.amilimani.com. Amil Imani is the author of the smashing book Obama Meets Ahmadinejad.
Update: Another great piece by Imani: Islam is a Grand Delusion