The Occupy Wall Street mantra: ‘What’s yours is ours and what’s ours is ours.’
The official Occupy Wall Street Twitter account’s…
…clarion call condoning theft:
The anarcho communist revolution will be subsidized by the hard work of others. When they are not stealing, OWS is begging for handouts to keep their radical extremist army on it’s feet.
Can we say lazy self-entitled punkz?
“Yes we can”.
Links:
http://twitter.com/#!/OccupyWallStNYC
http://twitter.com/#!/OccupyWallStNYC/status/170896809391177728
Update: Intriguing! Since I published OWS’s battle cry tweet to outright steal, Occupy Wall Street has edited their Twitter profile, and has also changed their Twitter avatar.
Here is OWS’s former Twitter profile:
And here is the brand spanking new one:
Note the disclaimer and the new avatar which includes the universal anarchist symbol. Precious, just precious.
FYI OWS: Anarchists do NOT “peacefully assemble”.
BTW Occupy Oakland’s Twitter avatar also displays the anarchist symbol.
Lady Liberty 1885 links…thanks!
(
The sort of unrest seen in the anti-Wall Street movement comes directly out of Alinsky’s secular bible called Rules for Radicals.
Alinsky hardly was squeamish about using filth to get his way. “If your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.” Later, he gave a fictitious but oh-so-literal example of one way to do it: He suggested that protesters gorge on beans before occupying a public building so that their — uh, their natural emissions — would literally create a stench. “In a fight almost anything goes,” he wrote. “It almost reaches the point where you stop to apologize if a chance blow lands above the belt.” Alinsky openly and exuberantly belittled the notion of ethics. All that mattered, he said, was whether your side is losing or winning. Only afterwards do you try to find an excuse for your illicit behavior: “The tenth rule of the ethics of means and ends is that you do what you can with what you have and [then] clothe it with moral garments.”
Critics have noted that the protesters often can’t even define what they are protesting, or that their “issues” are such a diverse hodgepodge as to be unintelligible. Again, this is straight from Alinsky’s playbook. The organizer, he wrote, “should search for and use the wrong reasons to achieve the right goals. He should be able, with skill and calculation, to use irrationality in his attempts to progress to a rational world. For a variety of reasons the organizer must develop multiple issues…. Multiple issues mean constant action and life.”
