US Intercepted Jihadists In Real Time Using Consulate Cell Phones To Call Higher Ups During Benghazi Attack!

June 12, 2014 at 4:53 pm

BOMBSHELL!

liars-benghazi1-e1350921614537

Spine chilling.
Their cold and calculating blame the video scheme was concocted to cover their tracks. Bloody tracks of their leaving four Americans to die.


(Fox) –The terrorists who attacked the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 used cell phones, seized from State Department personnel during the attacks, and U.S. spy agencies overheard them contacting more senior terrorist leaders to report on the success of the operation, multiple sources confirmed to Fox News.

The disclosure is important because it adds to the body of evidence establishing that senior U.S. officials in the Obama administration knew early on that Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and not a spontaneous protest over an anti-Islam video that had gone awry, as the administration claimed for several weeks after the attacks.

Eric Stahl, who recently retired as a major in the U.S. Air Force, served as commander and pilot of the C-17 aircraft that was used to transport the corpses of the four casualties from the Benghazi attacks – then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, information officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods – as well as the assault’s survivors from Tripoli to the safety of an American military base in Ramstein, Germany.

In an exclusive interview on Fox News’ “Special Report,” Stahl said members of a CIA-trained Global Response Staff who raced to the scene of the attacks were “confused” by the administration’s repeated implication of the video as a trigger for the attacks, because “they knew during the attack…who was doing the attacking.” Asked how, Stahl told anchor Bret Baier: “Right after they left the consulate in Benghazi and went to the [CIA] safehouse, they were getting reports that cell phones, consulate cell phones, were being used to make calls to the attackers’ higher ups.”
……
Stahl also contended that given his crew’s alert status and location, they could have reached Benghazi in time to have played a role in rescuing the victims of the assault, and ferrying them to safety in Germany, had they been asked to do so. “We were on a 45-day deployment to Ramstein air base,” he told Fox News. “And we were there basically to pick up priority missions, last-minute missions that needed to be accomplished.”

“You would’ve thought that we would have had a little bit more of an alert posture on 9/11,” Stahl added. “A hurried-up timeline probably would take us [an] hour-and-a-half to get off the ground and three hours and fifteen minutes to get down there. So we could’ve gone down there and gotten them easily.”

NEVER FORGET Obama and Hillary LIED –Americans DIED.

Related: Hillary Includes Photo Of Benghazi Caskets On “Hard Choices” Back Cover Photo Montage UPDATE: Sticker Price Already Slashed 40% [Photo]

Iraq Vet Rep. Tom Cotton’s Scathing Rebuke Of Dems “Fake Outrage” Over Benghazi [VIDEO]

May 9, 2014 at 8:20 am

“One other lesson I learned in the Army is that we leave no man behind. And we will not leave these four men behind.” –Rep. Tom Cotton
benghazi help denied
This bitch slap most def left a mark.
YouTube Preview Image

Mr. Speaker, couple lessons I learned in the Army were you moved to the sound of gunfire and the most important step in the troop leading procedures is to supervise the execution of you orders.

When Americans were fighting for their lives in Benghazi, Barack Obama did neither. He sent no quick reaction force and didn’t even stay in the situation room to supervise the execution of his orders. We expect more from the lieutenants in the army than our president gave us that night.

For two years he’s covered up this failure of leadership by stonewalling. Not anymore. We will now get to the truth.

But what do our colleagues on the other side of the aisle say to this? They express great outrage at politicizing this matter.

When I was leading troops in Iraq in 2006, men and women who were being shot at and blown up by al Qaeda, where was the outrage as they fundraised endlessly off the Iraq war?

Where was the outrage as they viciously attacked our commanders?

Where was the outrage when they said soldiers were war criminals?

Where was the outrage when they said the war was lost?

Where was the outrage when they said only high school dropouts join the Army?

Forgive me if I don’t join my democratic colleagues in their fake outrage. Four Americans lost their lives that night in Benghazi. They deserve justice and the American people deserve the truth.

One other lesson I learned in the Army is that we leave no man behind. And we will not leave these four men behind.

Salute.

Report: Boehner Okays Select House Benghazi Committee, Trey Gowdy To Chair

May 2, 2014 at 2:09 pm

Finally!

YouTube Preview Image

Boehner’s full statement.

And I just can not stress this enough; Boehner has picked…the right man…for the job:

YouTube Preview Image

The delicious cherry on top is that prog heads are exploding.
Tune in:

CNN’s Jake Tapper On Jay Carney’s Benghazi Responses: “Dissembling, Obfuscating, Insulting” [Audio]

May 2, 2014 at 10:34 am

DUDE!

YouTube Preview Image

REMINDER –Father of Benghazi Victim: Hillary Told Me We’re Going To “Arrest & Prosecute” Video Maker –3 Days Later They Did

May 2, 2014 at 8:26 am

 

This is not about politics.
This has to do with honor, integrity and justice.”
Charlie Woods; father of Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods slain in Benghazi terrorist attack

(Breitbart) –Charles Woods said that the President “couldn’t look me in the eye” and “mumbled” an “I’m sorry” but that it didn’t seem “genuine”. He said the same of Secretary Clinton and that Clinton assured him that they were going to “arrest and prosecute” the man that made the scapegoated youtube video critical of Islam.

And THREE days later they –DID: Obama’s Sharia Brownshirts Strike At Midnight

Related:

Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Morsi: Insulting Mad Bloody Mo “A Red Line” Urges Obama To Enforce Sharia Law In US [Updated]

Obama at UN: The Future Must Not Belong to Those Who Slander the Prophet of Islam [Video]

Trailer: “Innocence of Muslims” Mo Mocking Film That’s Being Blamed For Deadly Islamic Jihad In Libya –Filmmaker In Hiding

MUST WATCH! Rep. Jason Chaffetz Benghazi Hearing Q&A (5-1-2014)

May 1, 2014 at 10:13 am

United States Congressman Jason Chaffetz is a force to be reckoned with!

Previously: WATCH LIVE: House Hearing On Benghazi Scandal (New Witness’)

WATCH LIVE: House Hearing On Benghazi Scandal (New Witness’)

May 1, 2014 at 9:43 am



Obama-Admin-Twice-Refused-Request-To-Send-Military-Backup-In-Benghazi-Massacre

UPDATE:

Benghazi Recap: Phony Scandals, Lies And An Obscure Videotape Scapegoat

April 30, 2014 at 4:35 pm
YouTube Preview Image

Jay Carney Benghazi Lie #? : New Emails Were Not About Benghazi

April 30, 2014 at 3:10 pm

susan rice prep benghazi talking points directly tied to obama regime
susan rice prep benghazi talking points directly tied to obama regime 2

Lying liar Carney lies about the coverup of the coverup. To be precise he is lying straight to our faces America. HOW does that make you FEEL??
ABC’s Jonathan Karl goes on a full court Benghazi emails truth press…to no avail…
YouTube Preview Image

Transcript:

Q: Yeah, to follow up on the new Benghazi email, you knew full well that these Sunday show appearances were going to be dominated by the attack in Benghazi, right? As they were.

MR. CARNEY: Well, we certainly knew that that would be a big part of the shows.

Q: A big part or the primary thrust of those shows?

MR. CARNEY: Jon –

Q: You just had an attack on a — (inaudible) — consulate in Benghazi. You had Americans killed. You knew full well that what Susan Rice was primarily going to be asked about was about that attack — a terrorist attack on a U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

MR. CARNEY: Can I read the promo from your show, ABC “This Week”?

Q: (Inaudible) — all the promos — (inaudible).

MR. CARNEY: As — Jon, as –

Q: You do acknowledge that these — (inaudible) — was going to be about the Benghazi attack?

MR. CARNEY: Absolutely, about — Jon, absolutely. And she — and that’s why, as members of Congress did, Ambassador Rice relied on points about the Benghazi attack that were produced by the CIA.

Q: So –

MR. CARNEY: When — hold on. As American embassies throughout the region remain under fire — that’s ABC “This Week” promo. Again, we prepare Q-and-As for administration officials based on what we think they’re going to be asked. When I come out here –

Q: But did you –

MR. CARNEY: Hold on, Jon. Let me finish my sentence at least. When I come out here, when officials go out on daily shows or the Sunday shows, they have to anticipate — we have to anticipate what they’re going to be asked.

It is often forgotten that during that time period there was an enormous amount of attention and focus, appropriately, on the fact that there were protestors, sometimes violent protesters, surrounding U.S. embassies, causing us to draw down personnel at those embassies, causing great concern, understandably, about the safety of American personnel at other diplomatic facilities around the Muslim world.

And that was a focus of a great deal of press attention, and thus would be, as the promos indicate, one of the areas of focus of those Sunday shows. And so a Q-and-A was prepared for that, as is the case every Sunday.

What was also the case is that Ambassador Rice was, on the matter of Benghazi, relying on talking points that were originally created for members of Congress at the request of members of Congress so that they could go on television and talk about what happened in Benghazi.

Q: Ambassador Rice went on those shows, and she said that the attack in Benghazi was rooted in protests over an Internet video. We now know that that was not true, that, in fact, the CIA Director, Morell, just — former Director Morell just testified last month that quote, “when she talked about the video, my reaction was, that’s not something the analysts have attributed this attack to.”

It did not come from the CIA. You stood there at the podium time after time and said that she was referring to talking points created by the CIA. Now we see a document that comes from the White House, not from the CIA, attributing the protests to the video, and we have the former director of the CIA saying that that was not something that his analysts had attributed it to.

MR. CARNEY: Jon, I would point you to what Mike Morell has said repeatedly in testimony about the creation of the talking points.

Q: Well, now we have new talking points, and you didn’t release them — (inaudible) –

MR. CARNEY: Let me finish, please. Jon, I answered that question. The fact of the matter is, there were protests in the region. The talking points cited protests at that facility. The connection between protests and video — and the video turned out not to be the case, but it was based on the best information that we had, and the fact that there were protests –

Q: It was not based on what the CIA was saying, Jay.

MR. CARNEY: Jon, I would point you to — I understand the –

Q: This is what Morell said just last month, that when he heard that, he said that is not something our analysts have said. So that, now we see, came from the White House, right?

MR. CARNEY: Jon — no, you’re wrong. If you look at that document, that document that we’re talking about today was about the overall environment in the Muslim world — the protests outside of Khartoum — the embassy in Khartoum, outside of the embassy in Tunis, the protests outside of the embassy in Cairo. These were big stories.

These were — this was a big problem. And this was an ongoing story through that weekend when Ambassador Rice appeared in the Sunday shows. So to suggest that we wouldn’t have answers to questions about those situations –and unless you’re telling me now that those protests didn’t have anything to do with the video, it was entirely appropriate to have a question-an-answer document prepared for the video. When it comes to –

Q: (Off mic.)

MR. CARNEY: Jon, let me finish.

Q: (Off mic) — say that the — that the attack in Benghazi was rooted in a protest over the video? That’s what she’s –

MR. CARNEY: I know that you and I are both in a different time zone right now, but we’re still in April of 2014, and this is a discussion about what she said and what turned out to be the case that we have had dozens of time in this room. And the fact of the matter is she went out there with the best information that we had at the time. The CIA deputy director has testified to that. The fact that there were protests around the region threatening our embassies at the very same time is something that is often forgotten but obviously affected the whole environment about how we perceived what was happening at the time. And again, the implication is that we were somehow holding back information, when in fact we were simply saying what we thought was right. And when elements of that turned out not to be true, we were the first people to say so. It was based on what we knew at the time.

Q: Why were you holding back this information? Why was this email not turned over to the Congress? Why was it not released when you released all the other emails? This is directly relevant. Why did you hold this back?

MR. CARNEY: Jon, again –

Q: Why did it take a court case for you to release this — (inaudible) –

MR. CARNEY: Jon, I can say it again and again, and I know you can keep asking again and again. This document was not about Benghazi.

Q: It was her prep for the — for the Sunday shows.

MR. CARNEY: It wasn’t her only prep, John (sp). She relied on her — for her answers on Benghazi, on the document prepared by the CIA, as did members of Congress.

We, the White House rather, and others involved in her prep said, when it comes to Benghazi, there’s been a document prepared by the IC so that everybody is working off the same information — Republicans in Congress, Democrats in Congress, administration officials — this is what we know and what we are able to say about Benghazi at this time, and that’s what she got.

On all these other questions, as is the case for every Sunday, when the Treasury secretary goes out, when the deputy national security advisor goes out, when other administration officials go out, documents are prepared that anticipate questions from the press and provide answers based on our policy and our best understanding of what’s happening at the time.

Q: OK, but –

MR. CARNEY: That’s standard operating procedure. And if you look at the document in question here, it is not about Benghazi; it is about the protests around the Muslim world outside of U.S. embassies, and what we know about them and what we should say about them based on our policies.

Q: Just one last question, just in the interests of clearing the record. You said at the podium last year that the talking points that Susan Rice used for those Sunday show appearances were a product of the intelligence community, that the White House and the State Department only changed one word. We now know — obviously we’ve known for some time that that is not true. Can you correct the record on that?

MR. CARNEY: Well, Jon, for the last time, there were talking points prepared on Benghazi, there were talking points prepared on the overall matter — the overall dynamic in the Muslim world about protests. The White House had a role in that document obviously, as this release makes clear, as the White House does every time a senior administration official appears on the Sunday shows, as was the case in the Bush administration, in the Clinton administration, in the first Bush administration, going back to the advent of television, I dare say. So that’s always going to be the case.

Q: So you’re not going to correct the record on this?

(Inaudible) –

MR. CARNEY: Jon, you know, when it comes to correcting records, you know, we could get into that. And the fact is those talking points were, as the deputy director of the CIA testified before Congress, as he has talked to the press about on Benghazi, were created by the CIA.

Slimy Carney won’t even correct the record on past lies.

Via Washington Free Beacon

Related posts:

Krauthammer On Benghazi Emails: We Now Have The Smoking Document Exposing The Coverup Of The Coverup

April 30, 2014 at 9:29 am

“We now have the smoking document which is the White House saying we’re pushing the video because we don’t want to blame it [the Benghazi islamic jihad attack] on the failure of our policies.”

Via The Right Scoop

Related posts: