OUTRAGEOUS! Army Grants ‘Conscientious Objector Status’ to Muslim Soldier Based on Sharia Law [Updated: Facing Court Marshall for Possession of Child Porn --AWOL]

July 15, 2011 at 1:41 am

Political correctness is a cancer voraciously eating away at the soul of the United States.

Disarmed by Shariah — By Adm. James A. Lyons

Political correctness prevents Army from recognizing sedition

Today, the mind-numbing disease of political correctness has so infected the American military leadership that it is a threat in itself. The political correctness mentality was the principal reason why Fort Hood’s alleged murderer, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, was not cashiered out of the Army after a shocking June 2007 PowerPoint presentation [Link –Ed.] he gave as part of his psychiatric residency program. In that presentation, he reportedly warned his Army colleagues and supervisor at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center of “adverse events” that would occur if the Army did not accept the precepts of Islamic Shariah law and grant Muslims serving in the Army conscientious objector status.
Now it seems the Army has embraced Maj. Hasan’s position in an incredible decision made last month by the secretary of the Army to grant conscientious objector status to Pfc. Naser Abdo. He is a 21-year-old soldier, a member of the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Ky., who refused to deploy to Afghanistan, claiming that Shariah law prevented him from killing other Muslims.
By acceding to the dictates of Shariah, the Army has tacitly endorsed an absurd position that in effect sanctions Muslim service members to kill non-Muslims but forbids them to kill Muslims. Further, it is an unbelievable basis on which to classify them as conscientious objectors.

When Pfc. Abdo enlisted, he stated he initially believed that he could be a soldier and a Muslim at the same time. What changed his vision? He stated that his understanding of Islam “changed” as he went through training ahead of a planned deployment to Afghanistan. He worried whether going to war was the right thing to do.
Who helped the Army come to this inconceivable position on classifying Pfc. Abdo as a conscientious objector? My guess would be the Army received “guidance” from its Muslim “outreach partners,” who it believes are operating in America’s best interest. This would be classic stealth jihad at its finest.
…..His discharge from the Army is currently on hold because he has been charged with possession of child pornography. That should not be surprising: Shariah sanctions marriage of girls 9 years old and younger, in effect, legalized pedophilia.

Retired Navy Adm. James A. Lyons was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

Read it all >>>

Would a Christian be granted conscientious objector status because he believes his faith prohibits him from killing other Christians? The answer, as you know is a resounding –NO.


If you see this pervert, stealth jihadist POS, report to Fort Campbell, Kentucky ASAP.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A Muslim soldier from Fort Campbell who won conscientious objector status but then faced a court-martial after being charged with possessing child pornography has gone AWOL, an Army spokesman said Wednesday.

Pfc. Naser Abdo, 21, has been absent without leave since the July Fourth weekend, said Rick Rzepka, spokesman for Fort Campbell.

“I know that he’s safe, but other than that, that’s all I’m at liberty to share with people,” said Abdo’s attorney, James Branum.
The discharge was soon delayed because of the criminal charge, and Rzepka said an Article 32 hearing last month recommended Abdo for a court-martial. …

Continue reading >>>

Abdo’s facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Freenasserabdo/145763228777534

His Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeNasserAbdo

Edit: I have split all updates from this post; re: arrest of AWOL muslim soldier Nasser Jason Abdo near Fort Hood, who upon arrest was found with bomb making materials in his hotel room.

You can now find them here.


Poster in London: Shariah Controlled Zone

July 9, 2011 at 11:02 pm

At the risk of being called an islamophobic bigot (insert heavy sarcasm), isn’t it time that the powers that be come to the defense of those who have been screaming from the proverbial rooftops that stealth jihad is an all to real –REALITY?!

Via Gates of Vienna (Who has also posted the original photo. The image below was created to make for a more readable copy.)

A reader in London just sent us the following photo, which is fairly self-explanatory:

He included this note:

Please see attached a poster seen stuck on to a bus stop on corner of Mission Grove and Carisbrooke Road, London E17. Signs of subtlety in the message — avoiding items that might be thought of as controversial like killing homosexuals and stuffing women in bags.

H/T Winds of Jihad

Again from GOV, a tip on the source via the comment thread:

B Stew

I found the source These bastards just keep on pushing.


Source as linked by B Stew is ‘Muslims Against Crusades’, who explain their seditious Islamic project titled; The Islamic Emirates Project.

(Note the piece was published on 7 / 7 / 2011, coinciding with the anniversary of the 7/7 jihadist bombings in London. Not. A. Coincidence. EVIL.)

In the last 50 years, the United Kingdom has transformed beyond recognition. What was once a predominantly Christian country has now been overwhelmed by a rising Muslim population, which seeks to preserve its Islamic identity, and protect itself from the satanic values of the tyrannical British government.

There are now over 2.8 million Muslims living in the United Kingdom – which is a staggering 5% of the population – but in truth, it is more than just numbers, indeed the entire infrastructure of Britain is changing; Mosques, Islamic Schools, Shari’ah Courts and Muslim owned businesses, have now become an integral part of the British landscape.

In light of this glaring fact, Muslims Against Crusades have decided to launch ‘The Islamic Emirates Project’, that will see high profile campaigns launch in Muslim enclaves all over Britain, with the objective to gradually transform Muslim communities into Islamic Emirates operating under Shari’ah law.

With several Islamic emirates already well established across Asia, Africa and the Middle East, including Iraq and Afghanistan, we see this as a radical, but very realistic step in the heart of Western Europe, that will inshaa’allah (God willing), pave the way for the worldwide domination of Islam.

General Enquiries: 07870 285 910
Media Enquiries: 07956 600 569

The problem is that they are not exactly blowing smoke out of their flea bitten muslim behinds, Islamization is alive and well across Europe. With ‘no-go zones‘ sprouting up like noxious weeds across the continent and the UK. No go, as in no going in unless Muslim –if you value your life that is.

We in the US face a similar threat in Dearborn, Michigan. See ‘also see’ links below.

It is time for all good men and women to stand up to the Islamic onslaught on your native lands. Allowing them to further colonize (and that is indeed what they are doing) and in turn not pushing back against the horde, would be cultural suicide.

Speak out, the clock is ticking. To be more precise it is an Islamic time bomb set to explode in your faces. A weapon in a no holds barred, winner take all war. Remaining apathetic would be akin to slicing your own collective throats. Doing their dirty work for them.

It is your choice, choose wisely.

Islam’s worst enemy is –FREE SPEECH.

Also see:


Pat Robertson: Opposing Islam Just Like Opposing The Nazis [Video]

June 13, 2011 at 8:31 am

YouTube Preview Image

I wonder what were people who opposed the Nazis, were they bigots? Why is it bigoted to resist Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and to say we don’t want to live under Nazi Germany? But oh it’s bigoted if we speak out against a force that slowly but surely is trying to exercise domination over the world.

Amen brother.

Islamophobe (is-slahm-o-fohb) – A non-Muslim who knows too much about Islam.

Also see: Winston Churchill On Islam: “No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

Video: Shocking Excerpts Read at Tucson School Board Meeting From A Book In The Ethic Studies Curriculum [Updated]

May 12, 2011 at 12:52 pm

I am quite often disgusted and outraged at the systematic push to undermine America and all that she stands for. But since this case involves school children as young as third graders, it is all the more insidious. Listen in as a concerned citizen who resides in the Tucson United School District reads shocking, anti-American excerpts from “Ethnic Studies” textbooks during a TUSD board meeting.

Via Naked Emperor News at The Blaze: Bloodsucking Capitalists: Emotional Reading of Excerpts at Tucson School Board Meeting From a Book Used in the Controversial Ethnic Studies Curriculum for Grades 3rd – 12th (Content Warning)

*Edit: The Naked Emperor News video previously posted has been removed from YouTube.  But no worries, I’ve found a replacement.

YouTube Preview Image

As read at the meeting: “An Epic Poem”:

I shed tears of sorrow, I sow seeds of hate
The force of tyranny of men who rule by farce and hypocrisy,
In a country that has wiped out all my history, stifled all my pride.

In a country that has placed weight of my indignity upon my age old burdened back. Inferiority is the new load.
My land is lost and stolen, My culture has been raped
Poverty and city-living under the colonial system of the Anglo has castrated our people’s culture
One note, especially to those young chicanos, hard drugs and the drug culture is the invention of the gringo because he has no culture.
We have to destroy capitalism and we’ve got to have 5/6 of the world to destroy capitalism in order to equal all peoples lives. The Declaration of Independence states that we the people have the right to revolution, the right to overthrow a government that has committed abuses and seeks complete control over the people. This is in order to clean out the corrupted, rotten officials that developed out of any type of capitalistic systems. Any country that is based on capitalism is based on greed.

Other sections of the textbook as read:

Radical Shit

“Today I have a message for all the people of Aztlan to the children, the students, the workers, to the masses of our people, and to the bloodsuckers, the parasites, the vampires who are the capitalists of the world: The schools are tools of the power structure that blind and sentence our youth to a life of confusion, and hypocrisy, one that preaches assimilation and practices institutional racism.”

The Revolution

The revolution stands in life’s dark shadows waiting patiently for her (unintelligible) troops. The revolution sees Mexicans turning into gringos her (unintelligible) like washed up gringos …[sellout] and kiss the mans ass.

Glenn Beck discussed this topic yesterday with concerned Democrat Loretta Honnicutt (co-founder of Tucsonans United 4 Sound Districts (TU4SD). Learn more here: Mexican American/Raza Studies Curriculum, Research, and Findings

The Beck video also includes footage of (pro-illegal ethnic studies curriculum) protesting students creating chaos during TUSD school board meetings. Arrests were made, riot police were brought in to restore order.

(Segment at the 25:00 minute mark.)

YouTube Preview Image

Letters fron the TUSD superintendent John J. Pedicone in response to HB 2281, an Arizona law that bans ethnic studies that promotes the overthrow of the United States government and resentment toward a race of class of people.

(Note the dates.)

State action and TUSD’s response

On January 1, 2011, the new Ethnic Studies Law (A.R.S. sections 15-111 and 15-112) went into effect. On January 1, 2011, then-current Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Horne, notified TUSD that it is in violation of the new law. If the new Superintendent, John Huppenthal, determines after sixty days that TUSD has not come into compliance with the statute, the Superintendent can instruct the Department of Education to withhold 10% of TUSD’s funding (approx. $3 million) per month until the violation is cured.

First and foremost, it is TUSD’s intention that its employees at every level and in every department comply with the requirements of A.R.S. §§15-111 and 15-112. TUSD will pursue every legal avenue to protect effective programs and funding, and TUSD will operate its programs in compliance with the law.


John J. Pedicone, Ph. D.

From the Superintendent, Dr. John J. Pedicone

Letter to Administrators and Employees, Re. Ethnic Studies

January 3, 2011

To TUSD Administrators / Employees:

TUSD administration supports its Ethnic Studies programs, and we are encouraged by the real and lasting impact that these departments provide to TUSD students. TUSD’s primary charge is to educate students, please trust that TUSD will make every reasonable effort to ensure student safety, support effective programs that have relevancy to the students we serve, and protect funding.

TUSD’s position

1. TUSD supports all of its Ethnic Studies Programs.


Contact info (be polite):

TUSD Superintendent
John J. Pedicone, Ph.D.
1010 E. Tenth St. 85719
fax: 225-6174
Email: John.Pedicone@tusd1.org

PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 15-112(B)

Excerpt (pdf here) *link fixed

(section) 5. Written Materials

As noted earlier, the name of this course has been Raza Studies or Raza/Mexican American Studies. The very name “Raza” is translated as “the race.” On the TUSD website, it said that the basic text for this program is “the Pedagogy of The Oppressed.” The author is Paulo Frere, a Brazilian Marxist. Most of these students’ parents and grandparents came to this country, legally, because this is the land of opportunity. They trust the public schools with their children. Those students should be taught that this is the land of opportunity, and that if they work hard they can achieve their goals. They should not be taught that they are oppressed.

During the hearings of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Ethnic Studies bill, the school sent a number of students to testify how much they loved Ethnic Studies. A senator asked a girl whether she could have learned the things she spoke about in other courses. She responded: “No, before I took this course, I didn’t realize that I was oppressed. Now that took this course, I realize that I am oppressed.”

One of the textbooks is Occupied America (5th ed.). One of the leaders it talks about is described as follows: “José Angel Gutiérrez was one of the leaders, and he expressed the frustrations of the MAYO generation. His contribution was indispensable; it influenced Chicanos throughout the country.”

One of Gutiérrez’s speeches is described as follows:

We are fed up. We are going to move to do away with the injustices to the Chicano and if the ‘gringo’ doesn’t get out of our way, we will stampede over him.” Gutiérrez attacked the gringo establishment angrily at a press conference and called upon Chicanos to ‘kill the gringo,’ which meant to end white control over Mexicans.

The textbook’s translation of what Gutiérrez meant contradicts his clear language. In describing the atmosphere in Texas where Gutiérrez spoke, the textbook states: “Texans had never come to grips with the fact that Mexicans had won at the Alamo.” (P. 323.) It is certainly strange to find a textbook in an American public school taking the Mexican side of the battle at the Alamo.

Another textbook is the Mexican American Heritage (2nd ed.).

One of the chapters is “The Loss of Aztlan.” Aztlan refers to the states taken from Mexico in 1848: Arizona, California, New Mexico and Colorado. This chapter states: “Apparently the U.S. is having as little success in keeping the Mexicans out of Aztlan as Mexico had when they tried to keep the North Americans out of Texas in 1830.” (P. 107.) In other words, books paid for by American taxpayers used in American public schools are gloating over the difficulty we are having in controlling the border. This page goes on to state: “…the Latinos are now realizing that the power to control Aztlan may once again be in their hands.”

Materials for the course include a sheet titled “Chicano Resistance Vocabulary Squares.”

The students are given an example of student writing including the sentence “we are slowly taking back Aztlan as our numbers multiply.” The students are taught poems illustrated by the following:

“Going Back” – Victor E “El Vhu”

We’re going back, back to where we came from, back to where the truth dwells, AZTLAN…,We suffer colonial incarceration so we foster resistance of our own occupation.

“Decolonize” – “Aztlan Underground”

Some feel this oppression no longer exists Well here’s something they missed – Self D means self determination…Stranger in your own land under exploitation…This is the state of the indigena today…WE DIDN’T CROSS THE BORDERS, THE BORDERS CROSSED US! YET THE SETTLER NATION LIVES IN DISGUST! The American dream only for some WASP – White Anglo Saxon Protestant…the frame of mind that keeps our oppression constant…Cihuatl is reclaiming…We have returned to Aztlan!!! We have returned to Aztlan!!!

They are taught an essay called AZTLAN The Lost Land, “The Chicano Homeland” by John R. Chavéz which includes the following:

But to Chicanos the Southwest is more than just their place of residence; it is their homeland, their lost homeland to be precise, the conquered northern half of the Mexican nation…In the mind of the Chicanos, this immense territory remains their patrimony…Mexicans are indigenous to and dispossessed of the region…Chicanos view Southwest as an extension of Mexico and Latin America, a Mexican region spreading beyond what is regarded as an artificial boundary.

A worksheet in association with this essay has a map at the top showing Aztlan as all of Mexico, and some American States, including Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, California and Nevada. Among the questions asked on this worksheet are: “What are the four areas in the southwest that have had a Mexican cultural and demographic influence since the United States imposed its present boundary on Mexico?…In order for Chicanos to have cultural, political, and economic self-determination, what must Chicanos have control of in order to do so?”

In a section of materials called “Conquest and Colonización”, the students are taught “We will see how half of Mexico was ripped off by trickery and violence. We will see how Chicanos became a colonized people. In the process of being colonized, we were robbed of land and other resources.”

The students are taught “Critical Race Theory.” A part of the “Critical Race Theory” is defined by the materials taught to the students as follows: “Unlike traditional civil rights, which embraces incrementalism and step-by-step progress, critical race theory questions the very foundation of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.”

The materials for this class include “A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in School.” These materials include: “We often hear people referred to as being privileged, which usually is a comment pertaining to the individual’s financial or economic status…In Courageous Conversation, however, privilege takes on a different meaning: it refers to the amount of melanin in a person’s skin, hair, and eyes. (This is followed by a table which promulgates racial stereotypes by detailing the differences between “white individualism” “colored group collectivism.”) “White people tend to dominate the conversation by setting the tone for how everyone must talk and which words should be used. All of these “White ways” must be recognized, internalized, and then silently acted on by people of color”. (This is an example, referring to the statute, of subsection 2, “promote resentment toward a race or class of people”)…The aforementioned White cultural characteristics, such as individualism, blur into the consciousness of Whiteness, which becomes not only a way of behaving but also a way of thinking….White people depend on the overwhelming presence of other White people in positions of power and influence to maintain a system of racial advantage. At the same time, many White educators believe that gains in school, as in their own lives, come from individual effort and accomplishment.”

At page 200 of these materials, there is a table setting forth in detail the difference between “White Talk” and “Color Commentary.” These materials go on to state: “Anger, guilt, and shame are just a few of the emotions experienced by participants as they move toward greater understanding of Whiteness”. [If one were to substitute any other race for “Whiteness,” it would be obvious how this promotes resentment toward a race or a people.]

The materials go on to state: “White Americans often feel a unique sense of entitlement to Americanism, partly because many never travel beyond the borders of the United States.” All of these kinds of racist propaganda are fed to young and impressionable students, who swallow them whole, as illustrated by the rude behavior of some students during an address by Margaret Garcia Dugan and subsequent demonstrations. The education they are receiving, to deal with disagreements in an uncivil manner, will be dysfunctional for them as adults. It becomes the duty of the people of Arizona, through their elected leaders, as authorized by A.R.S. § 15-112, to put a stop to this, and to be sure that taxpayer-funded public schools teach students to treat each other as individuals, and not on the basis of the race they happen to have been born into.

These are some examples, that and are not an exhaustive list of the ways in which this course violates ARS § 15-111.

Bill Ayers approved!

Arizona Ethnic Studies Exposed
By Cliff Kincaid – Accuracy in Academia

One of Bill Ayers’ courses at the University of Illinois includes Pedagogy of the Oppressed [As referenced in above excerpt – Ed.] as required reading. Author Paulo Freire, a Brazilian Marxist, declared:

Also see: Video report: TUSD Board Members Bail when Opposition to Mexican-American Studies Expressed. – Mike Shaw TV


Londonistan, England: Black Flags of Jihad –Tolerated. EDL Effigy of Osama bin Laden –Offensive.

May 7, 2011 at 10:14 am

What is wrong with this picture?

Why are Pro-Islamic jihad signs…


…and ‘Black Flags of Jihad’ waved in the streets of London…


…not considered inflammatory or offensive…

…but an Osama bin Laden effigy is?!?!?!

osama effigy edl london bin laden mock funeral

Policeman tries to take the Osama effigy for fear it may upset tender Muslim sensitivities.

ATTENTION: Feckless, cowering dhimmis: The Black Flag of Jihad is a DECLARATION of WAR.

And what happens when Tommy Robinson a non-Muslim Englishman tries to take the Black Flag of Jihad from the hands of an openly seditious, treasonous Muslim? He is arrested.

YouTube Preview Image

Baron Bodissey

The Black Flag of Jihad is more than just a declaration of Muslim faith. It is Mohammed’s battle flag.

Throughout the history of Islam it has been displayed or flown whenever the mujahideen sally forth to behead the infidels. Suicide bombers record their last videos with the black flag in the background. Terrorists behead their captives for the camera while standing in front of the black flag.

The Black Flag of Jihad is a declaration of war. Those thugs who carried it that day in London were committing sedition and treason against the British state.

Tommy Robinson should have been given an official award for his heroic behavior, and the thugs burning the poppies should have been arrested.

But that’s not the way things work in Modern Multicultural Britain.

Still not convinced? Hesitant on taking the EDL and Baron Bodissey’s word? I present substantiation directly from the Combating Terrorism Center at none other than West Point Military Academy: Combating Terrorism Center at West Point 2006-The Islamic Imagery Project: Visual Motifs in Jihadi Internet Propaganda (page 98)

“The Black Flag (al-raya) traces it’s roots to the very beginning of Islam. It was the battle (jihad) flag of the Prophet Muhammad,…”

“In contemporary Islamist movement, the black flag is used to symbolize both offensive jihad and the proponents of reestablishing the Islamic Caliphate”

The Osama bin Laden effigy is an effigy of AL QAEDA’S TOP DOG, who now lays rotting at the bottom of the Arab Sea.

On the streets of Londonistan, England:

Black [War] Flags of [Global] Jihad –Will be tolerated.

Effigies of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden –Will not be allowed.

The [true] definition of Islam is –submission.

It would appear that the powers that be in the UK have made their choice.

Note: All photos were taken May 6, 2011, during demonstrations held in London at the U.S. Embassy. Each photo is embedded with it’s individual link at Yahoo Photos.


Related document: The Al Qaeda Training Manual seized by the Manchester (England) Metropolitan Police during a raid on an al Qaeda members home.

Treason –The Obama Administration Drops CAIR Terror Financing Indictments [Updated]

April 17, 2011 at 5:52 pm

Islamic America hating vultures salivating at the thought of the opportunity to gnaw at the carcass of what was once was the greatest country in the world. Forget prosecuting terror on US soil, Muslim feelings are at stake!

It is a felony offense to know or have reason to know that seditious activity is underway and do nothing about it. The term used in the U.S. Code for such a crime is misprision of treason. — Frank Gaffney

(PJM Exclusive) Did Obama and Holder Scuttle Terror Finance Prosecutions?
High-level source concedes DOJ let off CAIR co-founders and others for political reasons.

Patrick Poole

Red Green Alliance - The Obama Administration and Terrorist Front CAIR

Red Green Alliance Treason- The Obama Administration and Terrorist Front CAIR

…a number of leaders of Islamic organizations (all of whom publicly opposed the King hearings on Muslim radicalization) were about to be indicted on terror finance support charges by the U.S. attorney’s office in Dallas, which had been investigating the case for most of the past decade.But those indictments were scuttled last year at the direction of top-level political appointees within the Department of Justice (DOJ) and possibly even the White House. Included in those indictments was at least one of the co-founders of CAIR, based on Declination of Prosecution of Omar Ahmad, a March 31 DOJ legal memo from Assistant Attorney General David Kris to Acting Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler. A second DOJ official familiar with the investigation independently confirmed these details. Omar Ahmad is one of CAIR’s co-founders and its chairman emeritus. He was personally named, along with CAIR itself, as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror finance trial in 2007 and 2008. During the trial FBI Agent Lara Burns testified that both Omar Ahmad and current CAIR executive director Nihad Awad were caught on FBI wiretaps attending a 1993 meeting of Hamas leaders in Philadelphia.
According to my source, the chief reason outlined in the DOJ memo declining to prosecute CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad was the issue of potential jury nullification. The first Holy Land Foundation trial in 2007 ended in a hung jury. When the case was retried in 2008, all five defendants, former executives of the Holy Land Foundation, were convicted on all 108 counts.

But, according to our DOJ source, possible jury nullification was hardly the primary issue in the DOJ’s scuttling of the terror finance prosecutions. This was a political decision from the get-go, the source said.

It was always the plan to initially go after the [Holy Land Foundation] leaders first and then go after the rest of the accomplices in a second round of prosecutions. From a purely legal point of view, the case was solid. Jim Jacks [the U.S. attorney in Dallas who prosecuted the Holy Land Foundation executives] and his team were ready to go. There’s a mountain of evidence against all of these groups that was never introduced during the Holy Land trial and it is damning. We’ve got them on wiretaps. That’s exactly why many of these leaders and groups were named unindicted co-conspirators in the first round of prosecutions.

But from a political perspective there was absolutely no way that they could move forward. That’s why this decision came from the top down. These individuals who were going to be prosecuted are still the administration’s interfaith allies. Not only would these Muslim groups and their friends in the media be screaming Islamophobia at the top of their lungs and that this is a war against Islam, but the administration would look like absolute fools. It’s kind of hard to prosecute someone on material support for terrorism when you have pictures of them getting handed awards from DOJ and FBI leaders for their supposed counter-terror efforts. How would Holder explain that when we’re carting off these prominent Islamic leaders in handcuffs for their role in a terror finance conspiracy we’ve been investigating for years? This is how bad the problem is. Why are we continuing to have anything to do with these groups knowing what we know?


I can picture Obama and Holder et all on their knees licking the boots of Nazi’s.

This. Can. Not. Stand.

H/T Rusty Shackleford

Excerpt from Patrick Poole’s piece above:

During the trial FBI Agent Lara Burns testified that both Omar Ahmad and current CAIR executive director Nihad Awad were caught on FBI wiretaps attending a 1993 meeting of Hamas leaders in Philadelphia.

United States District Court Northern District of Texas documents of the CAIR- Hamas Philly meeting FBI wiretapping. Portion of the recorded convo. here: FBI Wiretap CAIR Hamas Meeting Philly 1993 #4 and here FBI Wiretap CAIR Hamas Meeting Philly 1993 #4E, the summary (list of participants) here: FBI Wiretap CAIR Hamas Meeting Summary Philly 1993

If you have time on your hands browse through the entire body of evidence here: USA v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development Exhibit List

Screenshot samples:

09/29/08 Philly 1993 #4E ( pg 3)
Om (Omar Ahmad CAIR founder)

09/29/08 Philly Meeting 5 (page 16)
UM1 (unidentified male)

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” –Cicero


More from Patrick Poole. RepPeter King is demanding answers.

(UPDATED) DOJ Source: Gov’t Muslim “Outreach” Jeopardized Active Terror Investigations

UPDATE: On the heels of last week’s article by Patrick Poole, Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has sent a letter to Eric Holder this morning demanding answers as to why the Department of Justice decided not to prosecute CAIR, its co-founder Omar Ahmad, and others regarding the Holy Land Foundation case. >>>>

Maggie at Maggie’s Notebook links…thanks!


Video: Portland Commies Get Their Violent Overthrow the US Freak On

March 21, 2011 at 7:02 am

Kudos to YouTube user daylightdisinfectant for documenting this anti-American, violent rhetoric laden hate fest.

(Part 1 & 2) March 11, 2010, Pioneer Courthouse Square, Portland Oregon. Socialists gather unlawfully. Security is shouted down, and a union member steps in to interfere with officers. Mob rule prevails. Participants advocate violence and assembling without the proper permits. Numerous profanities are used with children present. High School students are encouraged to walk out of class and are on the way. Signs show violent symbols (e.g., “Sacrifice the Rich,” cross hairs with bullet holes), and homophobic slurs (“Scott Walker is a Koch Fiend.”). More of the same is promised in the future.

YouTube Preview Image

YouTube Preview Image

(Part 3) March 11, 2010, Pioneer Courthouse Square, Portland Oregon: In Part 3 a crowd pan shot is done for the purpose of viewers crowd size estimates which I kindly request they comment. There are some protesters up close to the videographer that can not be seen so it is difficult to make an estimate. Next a protester references “elves in the night” as a legitimate means to achieve goals. This parlance commonly refers to ELF which was at one time the top domestic terror organization in the US as declared by the FBI. Another protester advocates students taking spring break in Madison. He states that he has a (quote/unquote) “Comrade” in Madison Wisconsin who he just spoke to. We move on to video and still right up front for all of the speeches including the numerous profanities (from Parts 1-3) is shown. A speaker makes a vitriolic speech where she “drops the ‘F’ bomb,” advocating public funding for Planned Parenthood, and alternative gender rights. Other F-Bombs can be heard. A child is shown learning to read from a socialist sign at the back of the crowd. A sign with a homophobic slur is shown. Socialist literature on display is shown. A sign disparaging “Corporate A$$holes” is shown with some younger protesters.

YouTube Preview Image

H/T Van Helsing of Moonbattery