VIDEO: ISIS Crucifixions This Is Islam. Now You Know.

August 14, 2014 at 6:34 am

Via Blazing Cat Fur:

 

And this, and this, and this, and this, and this. –et freaking cetera.

This is the politically incorrect truth that has to be said. Islam is the disease and Muslims are the carriers of it.” — Ex-Muslim Ali Sina (Founder of Faith Freedom.org)

Islam Delenda Est الإسلام يجب أن دمرت

Related Posts:

Raw Video Of Small Boys Allegedly Being Executed By Islamic Jihadists ISIS/ISIL/IS In Iraq *GRAPHIC*

August 10, 2014 at 7:09 am

This is islam.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again, islam does NOT have a humane bone in it’s entire death shrouded body. Evil inside and out.

Extremely graphic. Proceed with caution. Once you see it you can not unsee it.
I watch horrid scenes such as this because I feel you have to see the evil to truly know the evil. But the choice is yours. Scroll down if you wish to continue.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
YouTube Preview Image
Evil incarnate.

(danty263y) –Published on Aug 8, 2014
Why to turn our back on innocent children?

Translation anyone?

Islam Delenda Est

Related Posts:
ISIS/ISIL Burying 100′s Of Children ALIVE In Mosul! [PHOTO] -UPDATED

Muslim Savages Attack Yazidis Supporting Victims of ISIS/ISIL Jihad Genocide In Iraq With Knives

#WeAreN Christian Holocaust In Iraq: ISIS/ISIL “Systematically Beheading Children”

ISIS/ISIL Burying 100′s Of Children ALIVE In Mosul! [PHOTO] -UPDATE 2

August 9, 2014 at 11:30 am

Mohammed-Allah’s hounds of hell.

Human rights do NOT exist within Islam. Islam is a crime against humanity. Period. Full stop.

UPDATE:
In related religious cleansing genocide in Iraq news:

UPDATE 2:

Via Sky News:

Iraq militants have executed at least 500 ethnic minority Kurds dumping their victims in mass graves across the north of the country, the human rights minister has said.

There is “striking evidence” that Islamic State fighters, formerly known as ISIS, have buried some of their victims, including women and children, alive as they continue their bloody advance across Iraq.

The militants have driven as many as 150,000 Yazidis from their homes into the Sinjar mountains, where they are cut off from food and water and struggling to survive. Hundreds are already reported to have died.

The jihadists have also kidnapped 300 women as slaves.

Human rights minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said: “We have striking evidence obtained from Yazidis fleeing Sinjar and some who escaped death, and also crime scene images that show indisputably that the gangs of the Islamic States have executed at least 500 Yazidis after seizing Sinjar.

“Some of the victims, including women and children were buried alive in scattered mass graves in and around Sinjar.”
……
The militants have been sweeping through northern Iraq, beheading and crucifying captives who refuse to be converted to Islam. [...]

islam Delenda Est – الإسلام يجب أن دمرت

TMH links at NoisyRoom.net…thanks!

Related Posts:
Muslim Savages Attack Yazidis Supporting Victims of ISIS/ISIL Jihad Genocide In Iraq With Knives

#WeAreN Christian Holocaust In Iraq: ISIS/ISIL “Systematically Beheading Children”

Muslim Savages Attack Yazidis Supporting Victims of ISIS/ISIL Jihad Genocide In Iraq With Knives

August 9, 2014 at 11:06 am

isism-germany
An outcome of allowing muslim barbarians to breach the gate.

Islam(The Local) The Iraq conflict spilled onto the streets of Herford in North Rhine-Westphalia on Wednesday [August 6, 2014] evening as hundreds of members of the Yazidi faith clashed with supporters of Islamist terrorist group ISIS [aka ISIL]. Around 300 Yazidi took to the streets in the early evening. They were demonstrating against the attacks on members of their faith in Syria and Iraq and a religiously-motivated attack against their community earlier that day, Herford police reported.

The police decided to intervene after a large group of hooded people started attacking passers-by in the town centre, with at least one person injured. The police used pepper spray to control the mob, confiscating tools and one firearm, and took the details of 86 people involved.

Police reinforcements were called in from all over eastern Westphalia, including officers from Bochum and Dortmund, to keep the different groups apart. The police deployment lasted throughout the night and involved well over 100 officers, a Herford police spokesman told The Local.

The anger was touched off by a fight between five Yazidi and six radical Islamists in a restaurant near Herford train station at around 4pm. The restaurant was displaying a poster inviting people to join in a demonstration in support of the Yazidi in Iraq.

The 31-year-old owner of the restaurant and a 16-year-old schoolboy, both Yazidi, were wounded in the fight, which police said was fought with a knife and bottles.

Six people were arrested after the fight, most of them Islamist supporters from Chechnya and all of them known to the police.

The ISIS [aka ISIL] has been persecuting members of the ethnically Kurdish Yazidi, who mostly live around the town of Mosul in northern Iraq. Some Muslims call the Yazidi “devil worshipers” because they follow their own monotheistic religion.

There are thought to be around 60,000 Yazidi in Germany according to the faith’s central council, most of them living in Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia.

Many of them fled abroad during the years of persecution they have faced in their homeland.

islam Delenda Est – الإسلام يجب أن دمرت

H/T Pamela Geller

TMH links at NoisyRoom.net…thanks!

VIDEO: Vice News Journalist Embedded With ISIS/ISIL: The Spread of the Caliphate (Part 1 & 2)

August 9, 2014 at 8:54 am

Islamorealism.

VICE News reporter Medyan Dairieh’s got up close and personal with subhuman islamic jihad mongrels ISIS/ISIL.

The Spread of the Caliphate: The Islamic State (Part 1)
YouTube Preview Image

The Islamic State, a hardline Sunni jihadist group that formerly had ties to al Qaeda, has conquered large swathes of Iraq and Syria. Previously known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the group has announced their intention to reestablish the caliphate and declared their leader, the shadowy Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, as the caliph.

Flush with cash and US weapons seized during recent advances in Iraq, the Islamic State’s expansion shows no sign of slowing down. In the first week of August alone, Islamic State fighters have taken over new areas in northern Iraq, encroaching on Kurdish territory and sending Christians and other minorities fleeing as reports of massacres emerged.

Elsewhere in territory it has held for some time, the Islamic State has gone about consolidating power and setting up a government dictated by Sharia law. While the world may not recognize the Islamic State, in the Syrian city of Raqqa, the group is already in the process of building a functioning regime.

VICE News reporter Medyan Dairieh spent three weeks embedded with the Islamic State, gaining unprecedented access to the group in Iraq and Syria as the first and only journalist to document its inner workings. In part one, Dairieh heads to the frontline in Raqqa, where Islamic State fighters are laying siege to the Syrian Army’s division 17 base.

Grooming Children for Jihad: The Islamic State (Part 2)
YouTube Preview Image

In Part 2 of VICE News’ exclusive look at the emergence of the Islamic State, filmmaker Medyan Dairieh meets an Islamic State member from Belgium who works to indoctrinate some of the youngest members of the group. He also gains further insight into the minds of Islamic State fighters as they host celebrations and military parades featuring American tanks and APCs seized from the Iraqi army.

The Islamic State, a hardline Sunni jihadist group which formerly had ties to al Qaeda, is now in control of a large swath of territory in Iraq and Syria. The group, which adheres to the strictest form of Sharia law, is determined to establish a caliphate that stretches across the Middle East and into the rest of the Muslim world.

As the Islamic State continues its violent expansion in Syria and Iraq, it is also working to win the hearts and minds of new recruits and potential new members in areas it controls.

islam Delenda Est

I’ll post 3-5 as soon as they are released.
H/T Zip

#WeAreN Christian Holocaust In Iraq: ISIS/ISIL “Systematically Beheading Children”

August 8, 2014 at 8:23 am

face of mohammed skull
ISIS; members of the same same dead eyed Mohammedan Islamic death cult who have been firing rockets into Israel. Make no mistake, if ever given the chance Hamas would do the same in Israel. Though I am not so sure that Israeli Jews would be given the choice to convert.

This is the true face of Mohammed’s Islam. Islam offers nothing worthwhile to humanity. All it offers is death, destruction, violence, hate, discrimination and extreme misery — it is a crime against humanity.

(CNS) –”Christianity in Mosul is dead, and a Christian holocaust is in our midst,” said Mark Arabo, a Californian businessman and Chaldean-American leader. In an interview with CNN’s Jonathan Mann, he called what’s happening in Iraq a “Christian genocide” and said “children are being beheaded, mothers are being raped and killed, and fathers are being hung.”

“Right now, three thousand Christians are in Iraq fleeing to neighboring cities,” he told Mann. Arabo is calling on the international community to follow France’s lead and offer the Christians of Iraq asylum.
……
There’s actually a park in Mosul where they actually beheaded children and put their heads on a stick… this is crimes against humanity. They are doing the most horrendous, the most heart-breaking crimes that you can think of.”

Mann asked about the ISIS letter sent to Christians in Mosul, demanding that they either convert to Islam, pay a fine or be put to “death by the sword.”

“It’s very clear they are killing people, but are Christians managing to escape by paying a fine?” he asked.

Arabo reports that after Christians pay the fine, the fighters take the Christian wives and children “and make them their wives – so it’s really convert, or die.”

Continued >>>

Perspective:

Related: Obama Released al-Qaeda Linked ISIS Terror Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi From Camp Bucca In 2009

Thank You Letter From Hamas To The Media

July 31, 2014 at 11:48 am

A Letter of Thanks From Hamas to the International Media

Dear Members of the Mainstream Media,

You’ve been awesome! Everyone knows that we start unwinnable wars with Israel because the real victory happens when you predictably side with us each time. And you’ve been so supportive of our strategy that we really want to acknowledge your helpfulness. In particular, we thank you for:

-Focusing so much more on our suffering than anyone else’s. Nigerians must die in far greater numbers before you take notice, so we’re glad that you value our lives so much more.

-Minimizing your coverage, if any, of our attacks that led up to Israel’s military response and generally providing so little context that outsiders think that Israelis kill Palestinians just for fun. We’re especially grateful to the French media for this. Their distortions of the conflict are so one-sided that they incite Muslims across France to attack Jews and synagogues, and that is welcomed by our anti-Semitic worldview (although, unfortunately, such attacks remind everyone why Jews need a state).

Hamas MP Fathi Hamad we desire death like you desire life 2

Hamas MP Fathi Hamad on civilian human shields: “We desire death like you [Israeli Zionists] value life.”

-Emphasizing our civilian death toll without explaining that (1) our casualty reports are hasty and inflated, and (2) we maximize that total by using Palestinians to shield our weapons and by urging them to stay in the very areas that the IDF – in its annoying effort to minimize our civilian deaths – warns Gazans to evacuate.-Never mentioning the fact that if we could kill millions of Israelis, we would (after all, our charter calls for Israel’s destruction). Just as the 9/11 hijackers made the most of what they had but would have liked to kill far more Americans (for example, with the help of WMD), we too would love to kill far more Israelis. Indeed, we have purposely targeted Israel’s nuclear reactor on several occasions, with that very goal in mind. Fortunately, you never highlight the genocidal intent behind our attacks when mentioning Israel’s “disproportionate” response.-Never calling us jihadists even though we persecute Christians (like the ISIS, which just compelled Mosul’s Christians to convert to Islam). The forced conversion, expulsion, or murder of Christians and other religious minorities by Islamists has been happening for millennia, as assiduously documented in Crucified Again, but such historical context is thankfully absent from your reporting on our conflict with Israel.-Downplaying how bad we are for Gazans by not reporting on, for example, our attack on the very Israeli power station that provides electricity to 70,000 Gazans. Thankfully, you also ignored how the Israelis – in their stupid display of goodwill -exposed their workers to the perils of our rockets so that they could restore power to Gaza.

price of hamas gaza jihad terror tunnels

The least Hamas could do is build bomb shelters to protect civilians before they launch an offensive war against Israel, but do they? NO.

-Minimally reporting on our corruptionunfair wealth, or vast expenditures on tunnels to attack Israel while ordinary Palestinians grew poorer.

-Overlooking how – to maximize Palestinian deaths – we store our missiles in an UNWRA-run school and how, when UNWRA finds out, they just hand us back our missiles.

-Disregarding Arabs who have the courage to critique us – like Dr. Tawfik Hamid, an Islamist-turned-reformer who blames Palestinian suffering entirely on us.

-Ignoring Israelis’ humanitarian folly in providing medical aid to the very terrorists trying to kill them.

-Failing to acknowledge Israel’s immense restraint. Had we been fighting Syria’s Assad regime, by now Gaza would have been flattened – devastated by barrel bombs, poison gas, and other attacks that are far more indiscriminate than Israel’s intelligence-directed strikes. And of course, if Syria were killing us, you’d hardly care. But luckily, we’re dealing with Israel – that country that everyone loves to hate – so we can count on your helpful coverage here.

-Omitting how Israel chose to sacrifice dozens of IDF soldiers when destroying our tunnels and weapons in densely populated areas like Shejaiya because doing so with airstrikes (which risks no soldiers) would have killed many thousands of Palestinians. Your friendly omission of such crucial facts reminds us of how wonderfully you covered Jenin in 2002, when (again) – rather than praise Israel’s humane but costly decision to use ground troops rather than airstrikes - you very helpfully and falsely accused Israel of a massacre during another IDF operation to stop Palestinian terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians.

-Not sharing with your English readers what we openly say in Arabic: that we view any truce as just an opportunity to rearm for our next war against Israel (as our spokesman, Musheer Al Masri, recently declared on TV).

-Not underscoring that Israel can do nothing to make peace with us (after all, Israelis ended their occupation of Gaza in 2005 and we’ve been rocketing them ever since). It’s a bit nervy of Israel to use its border controls to limit our ability to rearm and rebuild cross-border attack tunnels, but – with your help – maybe the next cease-fire will remove Israel’s blockade so that we can more easily replenish our weapons and restore our tunnels for our next attack. And yes, we’re embarrassed that our fellow Arab Muslims in Egypt also choose to blockade us because of the problems that we’ve caused them.

-Not reminding readers, when you mention potential truce arrangements, that world powers are no more capable of ensuring a demilitarized Gaza than they were capable of disarming Hezbollah in south Lebanon.

Seriously, you’ve been AMAZING. Please keep it up!

Love,

Hamas

P.S. Many thanks also to the countless protesters around the world who follow your lead, embolden us, and make us look legit!

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

About Noah Beck

Noah Beck is the author of The Last Israelis, a doomsday thriller about the Iranian nuclear threat and current geopolitical issues in the Middle East.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

(Republished with permission)

Can we say cognitive dissonance? Yes, we can. Noah Beck’s brilliantly crafted piece has caused pro-pali prog heads to EXPLODE (see the comment section at Mediaite).

Related posts:

Beta Paper Tiger Obama Should Return His Nobel Peace Prize

July 19, 2014 at 10:27 am

“This is a president that has made his enemies stronger while selling out his allies.”

H/T BCF
How much more of Obama’s “global tranquility” can the globe withstand before it explodes?

Related:
Operation Hot Mic Starring Comrades Obama, Medvedev &Putin — Post-Election “Flexibility”!

2012: Obama Berates Romney For Wanting To Leave Troops In Iraq 2014: Obama Puts Boots Back On The Ground [FLASHBACK VIDEO]

2012: Obama Berates Romney For Wanting To Leave Troops In Iraq 2014: Obama Puts Boots Back On The Ground [FLASHBACK VIDEO]

June 17, 2014 at 9:55 am

Barack was against having US troops in Iraq before he was for it.

YouTube Preview Image

Transcript via BuzzFeed:
OBAMA: Gov. Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that Al Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not Al Qaida; you said Russia, in the 1980s, they’re now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.

But governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s.

You say that you’re not interested in duplicating what happened in Iraq. But just a few weeks ago, you said you think we should have more troops in Iraq right now. And the — the challenge we have — I know you haven’t been in a position to actually execute foreign policy — but every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong. You said we should have gone into Iraq, despite that fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction.

You said that we should still have troops in Iraq to this day. You indicated that we shouldn’t be passing nuclear treaties with Russia despite the fact that 71 senators, Democrats and Republicans, voted for it. You said that, first, we should not have a timeline in Afghanistan. Then you said we should. Now you say maybe or it depends, which means not only were you wrong, but you were also confusing in sending mixed messages both to our troops and our allies.

So, what — what we need to do with respect to the Middle East is strong, steady leadership, not wrong and reckless leadership that is all over the map. And unfortunately, that’s the kind of opinions that you’ve offered throughout this campaign, and it is not a recipe for American strength, or keeping America safe over the long haul.

SCHIEFFER: I’m going to add a couple of minutes here to give you a chance to respond.

ROMNEY: Well, of course I don’t concur with what the president said about my own record and the things that I’ve said. They don’t happen to be accurate. But — but I can say this, that we’re talking about the Middle East and how to help the Middle East reject the kind of terrorism we’re seeing, and the rising tide of tumult and — and confusion. And — and attacking me is not an agenda. Attacking me is not talking about how we’re going to deal with the challenges that exist in the Middle East, and take advantage of the opportunity there, and stem the tide of this violence.

But I’ll respond to a couple of things that you mentioned. First of all, Russia I indicated is a geopolitical foe. Not…

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: Excuse me. It’s a geopolitical foe, and I said in the same — in the same paragraph I said, and Iran is the greatest national security threat we face. Russia does continue to battle us in the U.N. time and time again. I have clear eyes on this. I’m not going to wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to Russia, or Mr. Putin. And I’m certainly not going to say to him, I’ll give you more flexibility after the election. After the election, he’ll get more backbone. Number two, with regards to Iraq, you and I agreed I believe that there should be a status of forces agreement.

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: Oh you didn’t? You didn’t want a status of… [forces agreement]

OBAMA: What I would not have had done was left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. And that certainly would not help us in the Middle East.

ROMNEY: I’m sorry, you actually — there was a — there was an effort on the part of the president to have a status of forces agreement, and I concurred in that, and said that we should have some number of troops that stayed on. That was something I concurred with…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Governor…

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: …that your posture. That was my posture as well. You thought it should have been 5,000 troops…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Governor?

ROMNEY: I thought there should have been more troops, but you know what? The answer was we got…

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: no troops through whatsoever.

OBAMA: This was just a few weeks ago that you indicated that we should still have troops in Iraq.

ROMNEY: No, I…

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: …I’m sorry that’s a…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: You — you…

ROMNEY: …that’s a — I indicated…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: …major speech.

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: …I indicated that you failed to put in place a status…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Governor?

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY:of forces agreement at the end of the conflict that existed.

OBAMA: Governor — here — here’s — here’s one thing…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: …here’s one thing I’ve learned as commander in chief.

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: Let him answer…

OBAMA: You’ve got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean. You just gave a speech a few weeks ago in which you said we should still have troops in Iraq. That is not a recipe for making sure that we are taking advantage of the opportunities and meeting the challenges of the Middle East.

Now, it is absolutely true that we cannot just meet these challenges militarily. And so what I’ve done throughout my presidency and will continue to do is, number one, make sure that these countries are supporting our counterterrorism efforts.

Number two, make sure that they are standing by our interests in Israel’s security, because it is a true friend and our greatest ally in the region.

Number three, we do have to make sure that we’re protecting religious minorities and women because these countries can’t develop unless all the population, not just half of it, is developing.

Number four, we do have to develop their economic — their economic capabilities.

But number five, the other thing that we have to do is recognize that we can’t continue to do nation building in these regions. Part of American leadership is making sure that we’re doing nation building here at home. That will help us maintain the kind of American leadership that we need.

Whether Barack cares to admit it or not –heOWNS Iraq

The Islamist blitzkrieg in Iraq is the direct result of President Obama’s failure to maintain an American military presence there. As David French has shown, when Obama took office the Islamist extremists were a subdued and nearly defeated force. With a continued American presence, they would have remained subdued.

Some Obama apologists argue that we could not maintain our military presence because the Iraqi government wanted us out, and thus would not negotiate a status of forces agreement with us. In reality, though, Iraqi prime minister Maliki and his government wanted a continued U.S. military presence, and it was Obama who never seriously negotiated for this to happen. His goal was a complete military withdrawal so he could boost that he ended the war in Iraq.

You don’t have to my word for this. Dexter Filkins, who covered the Iraq war for the New York Times, has written an article in the New Yorker that lays out the sorry history.

I urge you to read the whole thing, but here are relevant highlights:

Filkins confirms that the Iraqi government wanted a continued U.S. military presence. He writes:

The leaders of all the major Iraqi parties had privately told American commanders that they wanted several thousand military personnel to remain, to train Iraqi forces and to help track down insurgents. The commanders told me that Maliki, too, said that he wanted to keep troops in Iraq. But he argued that the long-standing agreement that gave American soldiers immunity from Iraqi courts was increasingly unpopular; parliament would forbid the troops to stay unless they were subject to local law.

So there was a sticking point that required negotiations. Unfortunately, the Obama administration did not seriously negotiate:

For several months, American officials told me, they were unable to answer basic questions in meetings with Iraqis — like how many troops they wanted to leave behind — because the Administration had not decided. “We got no guidance from the White House,” [one official] told me. “We didn’t know where the President was. Maliki kept saying, ‘I don’t know what I have to sell.’”

“The American attitude was: Let’s get out of here as quickly as possible,” Sami al-Askari, the Iraqi member of parliament, said.

That, of course, is what happened.

READ it ALL.

Present tense: Boots on the ground: Obama sending “small number” of Special Forces troops to assist Iraq

An islamic clusterf*ck of epic proportions such as the situation in Iraq was bound to occur when an anti-war, anti-American, left-wing extremist islamophile man child whose goal is to destroy the US (and everything else in his path), is put in charge.

Also see: George W. Bush predicted EXACTLY what is happening in Iraq today – ‘Mass killings, terrorist safe haven…’

Obama Released al-Qaeda Linked ISIS Terror Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi From Camp Bucca In 2009

June 13, 2014 at 8:23 am

Blood for political appeasement.

Abu_Bakr_al-Baghda_2788160b

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (inset) and fighters (waving black flag of jihad) of the al-Qaeda linked Islamic State of Iraq Photo: REUTERS

al-Baghdadi must have promised to turn Iraq into a land of  “milk and honey“.

(The Telegraph) –The march of al-Qaeda-linked militants towards the Iraqi capital is a coup for the shadowy leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – a former US detainee

The FBI “most wanted” mugshot shows a tough, swarthy figure, his hair in a jailbird crew-cut. The $10 million price on his head, meanwhile, suggests that whoever released him from US custody four years ago may now be regretting it.

460x467xabu-dua.jpg.pagespeed.ic.G8omNqnxpXTaken during his years as a detainee at the US-run Camp Bucca in southern Iraq, this is one of the few known photographs of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the new leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq and Syria, now known as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS). But while he may lack the photogenic qualities of his hero, Osama bin Laden, he is fast becoming the new poster-boy for the global jihadist movement.

Well-organised and utterly ruthless, the ex-preacher is the driving force behind al-Qaeda’s resurgence throughout Syria and Iraq, putting it at the forefront of the war to topple President Bashar al-Assad and starting a fresh campaign of mayhem against the Western-backed government in Baghdad.

This week, his forces have achieved their biggest coup in Iraq to date, seizing control of government buildings in Mosul, the country’s third biggest city, and marching further south to come within striking distance of the capital, Baghdad. Coming on top of similar operations in January that planted the black jihadi flag in the towns of Fallujah and Ramadi, it gives al-Qaeda control of large swathes of the north and west of the country, and poses the biggest security crisis since the US pull-out two years ago.
……

“This guy was a Salafi (a follower of a fundamentalist brand of Islam), and Saddam’s regime would have kept a close eye on him,” said Dr Michael Knights, an Iraq expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

“He was also in Camp Bucca for several years, which suggests he was already considered a serious threat when he went in there.”

That theory seems backed by US intelligence reports from 2005, which describe him as al-Qaeda’s point man in Qaim, a fly-blown town in Iraq’s western desert.

“Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim”, says a Pentagon document. “He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.”

Why such a ferocious individual was deemed fit for release in 2009 is not known.

Continue reading >>>

We can wring our hands, pontificate and analyze this until we are blue in the face, but nothing will change until the majority of western leaders call out islam for what it is.

Fighting the enemy without calling it by it’s name is a monumental waste of time, blood and treasure.

H/T Jim Hoft